Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T19:01:01.495Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Measurement of Relevant Change after Psychotherapy: Use of Repertory Grid Testing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Anthony Ryle  and
Martin E. Lunghi
Anthony Ryle
Affiliation:
University of Sussex Health Service, Fainter, Brighton, Sussex
Martin E. Lunghi
Affiliation:
University of Sussex Health Service, Fainter, Brighton, Sussex
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Psychotherapists, who by temperament are likely to be tender-minded, have up to now largely failed to devote “attention to the problems of quantitative assessment” (Sutherland et al., 1967), and have perhaps been too prone to regard the complaints of tough-minded critics as manifestations of unconscious resistance. If, as most therapists do, one retains the conviction that patients are altered by the experience of psychotherapy, it should be possible to demonstrate and measure such alteration. The fact that attempts to measure change are often unconvincing is probably a function of the crudity or irrelevance of many of the measuring instruments used.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 115 , Issue 528 , November 1969 , pp. 1297 - 1304
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1969 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bannister, D. (1965). “The rationale and clinical relevance of repertory grid technique.” Brit. J. Psychiat., 111, 977–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crown, S., and Crisp, A. H. (1966). “A short clinical diagnostic self-rating scale for psychoneurotic patients.” Ibid., 112, 917–923.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., and Eysenck, B. G. (1964). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. University of London Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, G. A. (1955). The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Mar, J. M. M., and Crisp, A. H. (1968). “Estimating psychological organization, meaning and change in relation to clinical practice.” Brit. J. med. Psychol., 41, 15–29.Google Scholar
Shapiro, M. B. (1966). “The single case in clinical psychological research.” J. gen. Psychol., 1966, 74, 3–23.Google Scholar
Slater, P. (1965). “The use of the repertory grid technique in the individual case.” Brit. J. Psychiat., 111, 965–975.Google Scholar
Sutherland, J. D., Gill, H. S., and Phillipson, H. (1967). “Psychodiagnostic appraisal in the light of recent theoretical developments.” Brit. J. med. Psychol., 40, 299–315.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.