Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T08:29:50.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Logical and Psychometric Prerequisites for Cognitive Therapy of Schizophrenia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2018

Will Spaulding
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln
Calvin P. Garbin
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln
W. Jeff Crinean
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Extract

This discussion follows from a key premise that there is potential clinical value in identifying and directly treating the cognitive abnormalities which for over a century have been seen as the hallmarks of schizophrenia. This is both an old and a relatively new idea. It is old, in that the psychodynamic approaches to psychotherapy, especially ego psychology, have long sought to modify cognition in schizophrenia, if unsystematically and indirectly. It is new, in that only in the last decade have both the contemporary technologies of the information processing laboratory and of cognitive-behaviour modification been applied to the problem of treatment. The failures of psychodynamic treatment approaches with schizophrenic patients have perhaps discouraged widespread experimentation with cognitive models in clinical assessment and treatment. This is unfortunate, as contemporary clinical procedures and laboratory technologies are hardly comparable to psychodynamic methods. In the past decade findings have accumulated, in the form of case reports, single-subject experiments and treatment trials, which support the potential usefulness of assessing and directly treating schizophrenic patients' cognitive abnormalities (reviewed by Spaulding et al, 1986).

Type
III. From the Perspective of Individual Psychology
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arieti, S. (1955) Interpretation of Schizophrenia. New York: Robert Brunner.Google Scholar
Bernstein, I. & Garbin, C. (1985) A comparison of alternative proposed subscale structures for MMPI Scale 2. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 20, 223235.Google Scholar
Cromwell, R. (1984) Pre-emptive thinking and schizophrenia research. In Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 31: Theories of Schizophrenia and Psychosis (eds Spaulding, W. & Cole, J.). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Cromwell, R. & Spaulding, W. (1978) How schizophrenics handle information. In The Phenomenology and Treatment of Schizophrenia (eds W. Fann, I. Karacan, A. D. Pokorny, et al). New York: Spectrum.Google Scholar
Gorsuch, R. (1983) Factor Analysis (2nd edn). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Nuechterlein, K. & Dawson, M. (1984) Information processing and attentional functioning in the developmental course of schizophrenic disorders. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 10, 160203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pimentel, R. (1979) Morphometrics: The Multivariate Analysis of Biological Data. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.Google Scholar
Shakow, D. (1963) Psychological deficit in schizophrenia. Behavioral Science, 8, 275305.Google Scholar
Spaulding, W., Storms, L., Goodrich, V., et al (1986) Applications of experimental psychopathology in psychiatric rehabilitation. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 12, 560577.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.