Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T03:57:32.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

NARRATOLOGY IN THE PRACTICE SESSION MODEL OF ELLIOTT CARTER'S STRING QUARTET NO. 5

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 July 2023

Abstract

Elliott Carter's programme notes for his String Quartet No. 5 describe it as being about the embodiment of human interaction within the rehearsal process. This article develops this concept, evaluating the musical figures that are foreshadowed by the fragments that Carter suggests are rehearsal outtakes. Certain motives are reiterated and developed through slight variations, thus exemplifying the rehearsal process, and perhaps the editorial process, in detail. Interactions within this model are suggestive of the character types that Carter has delineated in his previous string quartets, notably No. 2. Using the Practice Session model also alludes to the real-life circumstances of the preparation of previous quartets by ensembles, and anecdotes about the Juilliard Quartet's rehearsals for the premiere of the String Quartet No. 3 can enhance a narratological understanding of the No. 5's construction. Finally, String Quartet No. 5 is considered as an example of one of the transitional works that initiate Carter's late style and its consolidation of material; its use of all-interval chords, their subsets and supersets reflects the constructive elements of human interaction that Carter has stressed as a principal thematic element.

Type
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Carter, Elliott, ‘Note from the Composer’, String Quartet No. 5 (New York: Hendon Music, 1995)Google Scholar, unpaginated.

2 Aylward, John, ‘Metric Synchronization and Long-Range Polyrhythms in Elliott Carter's Fifth String Quartet’, Perspectives of New Music, 47, no. 2 (2009), pp. 8899CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Emmery, Laura, Compositional Process in Elliott Carter's String Quartets: A Study in Sketches (Abingdon: Routledge, 2020), pp. 206207Google Scholar.

4 Mead, Andrew, ‘Pitch Structure in Elliott Carter's String Quartet No. 3’, Perspectives of New Music, 22, nos 1 and 2 (1983–84), pp. 3160CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Bal, Mieke, Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1997), p. 16Google Scholar.

6 Carter, Elliott, ‘Program Note’, String Quartet No. 2 (New York: Associated Music Publishers, Inc., 1959)Google Scholar; see also Schiff, David, The Music of Elliott Carter, 2nd edn (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998), pp. 171–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Joshua Mailman, ‘An Imagine Drama of Competitive Opposition in Elliott Carter's Scrivo in Vento, with Notes on Narrative, Symmetry, Quantitative Flux, and Heraclitus’, Music Analysis, 28, nos 2 and 3 (2009), pp. 373–422.

8 Boland, Marguerite and Link, John, eds, Elliott Carter Studies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 110–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Carey, Christian, Les Actes du colloque Hommage à Elliott Carter (Paris: Editions Delatour, 2013)Google Scholar; Christian Carey, ‘Capuzzo's Questions’, The Open Space, no. 21 (2018), pp. 394–98.

10 Carter, Elliott, ‘Note from the Composer’, String Quartet No. 5 (New York: Hendon Music, 1995)Google Scholar.

11 John Link, Elliott Carter's Late Music (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022), pp. 37–76.

12 Emmery, Compositional Process in Elliott Carter's String Quartets, p. 175.

13 Robert D. Morris, ‘Pitch-Class Complementation and Its Generalizations’, Journal of Music Theory, 34, no. 2 (1990), pp. 175–245; Guy Capuzzo, ‘The Complement Union Property in the Music of Elliott Carter’, Journal of Music Theory, 48, no. 1 (2004), pp. 1–24.

14 J. Daniel Jenkins, ‘After the Harvest: Carter's Fifth String Quartet and the Late Late Style’, Music Theory Online, 16, no. 3 (2010), pp. 16–38.

15 Elliott Carter, Harmony Book, eds Nicholas Hopkins and John F. Link (New York: Carl Fischer, 2002).

16 Jonathan W. Bernard, ‘Problems of Pitch Structure in Elliott Carter's First and Second String Quartets’, Journal of Music Theory, 37, no. 2 (1993), pp. 235–43.

17 Ibid., p. 244.

18 John Roeder, ‘A Transformational Space for Elliott Carter's Recent Complement-Union Music’, in Proceedings of the First International Conference of the Society of Mathematics and Computation in Music (Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 2009).

19 Marguerite Boland, ‘“Linking” and “Morphing”: Harmonic Flow in Elliott Carter's Con Leggerezza Pensosa’, TEMPO, 60, no. 237 (2006), p. 35.

20 Jenkins, ‘After the Harvest’.

21 Schiff, The Music of Elliott Carter, p. 26.

22 Emmery, Compositional Process in Elliott Carter's String Quartets, p. 193.

23 Link, Elliott Carter's Late Music, pp. 331–32.

24 Boland and Link, Elliott Carter Studies, pp. 47–49.

25 Schiff, The Music of Elliott Carter, p. 26.

26 Felix Meyer and Anne C. Shreffler, Elliott Carter: A Centennial Portrait in Letters and Documents (Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 2008), p. 15.

27 Laura Emmery, ‘An American Modernist: Teatime with Elliott Carter’, TEMPO, 67, no. 264 (2013), pp. 25–26.

28 Meyer and Shreffler, Elliott Carter, p. 15.

29 Link, Elliott Carter's Late Music, p. 327.

30 Schiff, The Music of Elliott Carter, pp. 73–74.

31 Boland and Link, Elliott Carter Studies, pp. 129–31.

32 Yeon-Su Kim, ‘Stylistic Analysis of Elliott Carter's String Quartet No. 5: Aspects of Character and Rhythm’ (DMA dissertation, Boston University, 2006).

33 Felix Meyer and Anne C. Shreffler, Elliott Carter: A Centennial Portrait in Letters and Documents (Woodbridge, Suffolk: The Boydell Press, 2008), p. 15. Emmery 2020. 212.

34 Emmery, Compositional Process in Elliott Carter's String Quartets, pp. 216–17; Jenkins, ‘After the Harvest’.