Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T04:32:47.655Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Marginalia quasi una Fantasia: on the Second Violin Sonata by Alfred Schnittke

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

Dmitri Smirnov
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Second Violin Sonata for violin and piano (1968), subtided Quasi una Sonata, is one of Alfred Schnittke's most popular works, and it is one of my personal favourites among his pieces (alongside his First Symphony, First String Quartet, First Hymn, Second and Third Violin Concerti, Three Madrigals, etc). I discovered Schnittke's music in April 1969 at an underground concert given in the Gnessin Institute in Moscow by Alexei Lyubimov (piano), Boris Berman (piano), Lev Mikhailov (clarinet) and a few string players. This half-forbidden concert, organized by Alexander Ivashkin, was all that remained of a whole festival, which had been cancelled at the last moment by the authorities. The concert was split into three parts, the first two of them dedicated to the music of the Soviet avant-garde, with compositions by the likes of Edison Denisov, Tigran Mansurian, Valentin Silvestrov, Viktor Ekimovsky and Kuldar Sink etc. At the end of the second part there was a perfonnance of Schnittke's Serenade for five musicians. This very cheerful and fanny piece, entangled with hundreds of short quotations, sounded very different from the rest of the program. The final part of the concert contained works of Schoenberg, Berg and Webern, played for the first time in Brezhnev's Soviet Union.

Type
Research Article
Information
Tempo , Issue 220 , April 2002 , pp. 2 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ivashkin, Alexander, Conversations with Alfred Schnittke,Moscow 1994, p. 49 Google Scholar.

2 Ivashkin, , Conversations, p. 51.Google Scholar

3 see for details: Ivashkin, Alexander, Alfred Schnittke (London: Phaidon Press, 1996), pp. 110–111 Google Scholar.

3 The authors go on to list articles by Tarankov, (‘New life for old forms’, Sovyelskaya Muzika, 1968 no.6)Google Scholar, Butsko (‘Encounters with chamber music’, ibid., 1970, no.8), Karminsky, (‘Polystylistic problems in contemporary music’, diploma work, Moscow Conservatory, 1975)Google Scholar, Savenko, (‘Portrait of the Artist in Maturity’, Sovyetskaya Muzika, 1981 no.9). I think that all of these sources, together with some words by Schnittke himself, are summarized in this chapterGoogle Scholar.

4 Quoted from the article by Kalashnikova, Svetlana: ‘Universality and — laconicism?’, Musical Academic, No.2, 1999, p.84 Google Scholar.

5 Quoted from: Tlie Encyclopaedic Musical Dictionary (Moscow, 1966), p.480 Google Scholar.

6 ‘New musical material? The birth of the sound image’ (Moscow, 1985), p. 218 Google Scholar.

7 Ivashkin, , Conversations, pp. 60–61 Google Scholar.