Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T23:23:06.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

HANS KELLER, NIKOS SKALKOTTAS AND THE NOTION OF SYMPHONIC GENIUS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2013

Eva Mantzourani
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In his writings on music Hans Keller includes Skalkottas among the few great twentieth-century composers of ‘symphonic thought’, and considers him to be the only ‘symphonic genius’ after Schoenberg whose ‘genius’ remains to be discovered. Although during the time of his writings, Keller was in a minority in his appreciation of this relatively minor composer in the Western art music canon, he did not analyse any of Skalkottas's music in support of his views, as he did with the works of other composers who, although important to him, are not elevated to such a high plane. This paper first gives an overview of Keller's approach to and understanding of symphonic thought, as presented in his various writings and exemplified in his analyses of Schoenberg's music. Subsequently, it examines certain of Skalkottas's 12-note works and the compositional techniques he applies to construct them, which exhibit these characteristics of symphonic thought defined by Keller, and which might be used to substantiate his unexplained but intuitively correct assertions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Tempo , Volume 67 , Issue 263 , January 2013 , pp. 33 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Auner, Joseph, ‘Schoenberg's Handel Concerto and the Ruins of the Tradition’, Journal of the American Musicological Society, 49 (1996), pp. 264–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babbitt, Milton, ‘Memoirs’ in ‘Hans Keller (1919–1985): A Memorial Symposium’, Music Analysis, 5 (1986), pp. 374–76.Google Scholar
Cherlin, Michael, ‘Memory and Rhetorical Trope in Schoenberg's String Trio’, Journal of the American Musicological Society, 51 (1998), pp.559–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlhaus, Carl, Analysis and Value Judgment, trans. Levarie, Siegmund. New York: Pendragon Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Dahlhaus, Foundations of Music History, trans. Robinson, J.B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Frisch, Walter, Brahms and the Principle of Developing Variation. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Garnham, A.M., Hans Keller and the BBC. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Goldsmiths College, University of London, 1999.Google Scholar
Garnham, A.M., Hans Keller and the BBC: The Musical Conscience of British Broadcasting, 1959–79. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2003.Google Scholar
Haimo, Ethan, ‘Developing Variation and Schoenberg's Serial Music’, Music Analysis, 16/3 (1997), pp. 349–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, Martha, ‘Neoclassical and Anachronistic Impulses in Twentieth-Century Music’, Music Theory Spectrum, 18 (1996), pp. 200–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Kritik der Urtheilskraft in Immanuel Kant's Sämmtliche Werke, ed. Rosenkranz, Karl and Schubert, Friedr. Wilhelm, vol.IV. Leipzig, 1838.Google Scholar
Keller, Hans, ‘Nikos Skalkottas: An Original Genius’, The Listener, 52/134 (December 1954), p. 1041.Google Scholar
Keller, Hans, ‘K.503: The Unity of Contrasting Themes and Movements’, The Music Review, 17/1 (1956), pp.48–58, and 17/2 (1956), pp. 120–29.Google Scholar
Keller, Hans, ‘Chamber Music’, in The Mozart Companion, ed. Robbins Landon, H.C. and Mitchell, Donald. London: Faber and Faber, 1956, pp. 90–137.Google Scholar
Keller, Hans, ‘Functional Analysis’, Musical Opinion, 81 (December 1958), p. 157.Google Scholar
Keller, Hans, ‘Frankel and the Symphony’, The Musical Times, 111/1524 (February 1970), pp. 144–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Hans, ‘The Future of Symphonic Thought’, Perspectives of New Music, 13/1 (Fall–Winter, 1974), pp. 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, Hans, lecture ‘Schoenberg's String Quartet No.4’ on BBC Radio 3, 22 September, 1974; transcription of the lecture in Alison Garnham, Hans Keller and the BBC. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Goldsmiths College, University of London, 1999.Google Scholar
Keller, Hans, 1975 (1984 minus 9). London: Dobson, 1977; reissued as Music, Closed Societies and Football. London: Toccata Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Keller, Hans, ‘Schoenberg's Return to Tonality’, Journal of the Arnold Schoenberg Institute, 5/1 (1981), pp. 2–21.Google Scholar
Keller, Hans, Criticism, ed. Hogg, Julian. London: Faber & Faber, 1987.Google Scholar
Keller, Hans and Cosman, Milein, Stravinsky Seen and Heard. London: Toccata Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Kurth, Richard, ‘Moments of Closure: Thoughts on the Suspension of Tonality in Schoenberg's Fourth Quartet and Trio’, In Brinkmann, Reinhold, and Wolff, Christoph, eds, Music of My Future: The Schoenberg Quartets and Trio (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2000), pp. 139–160.Google Scholar
Lebrecht, Norman, The Companion to 20th Century Music. London: Simon & Schuster Ltd, 1992.Google Scholar
Lewin, David ‘A Theory of Segmental Association in Twelve–Tone Music’, Perspectives of New Music, 1 (1962), pp. 89–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowinsky, Edward E., ‘Musical Genius – Evolution and Origins of a Concept’, Musical Quarterly, 50/3 (1964): 321–40, and 50/4 (1964), pp. 476–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowinsky, Edward E., ‘Musical Genius’, In Wiener, Philip P., ed., The Dictionary of the History of Ideas, vol. 2. New York: Scribner, 1973–74, pp. 312–326.Google Scholar
Mantzourani, Eva, ‘The disciple's tale: The reception and assimilation of Schoenberg's teachings on Grundgestalt, Coherence and Comprehensibility by his pupil, the composer Nikos Skalkottas’, The Journal of the Arnold Schoenberg Center, 3 (2001), pp. 227–38.Google Scholar
Mantzourani, Eva, ‘Tonal influences and the reinterpretation of classical forms in the twelve-note works of Nikos Skalkottas’, ex–tempore, XII/1 (Spring/Summer 2004), pp. 47–65.Google Scholar
Mantzourani, Eva, ‘Nikos Skalkottas: Sets and Styles in the Octet’, The Musical Times, 145 (Autumn 2004), pp. 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantzourani, Eva, ‘“All we need is geniuses”’, In Annals of Aesthetics, 43 (2005–6), pp. 109–120.Google Scholar
Mantzourani, Eva, ‘In the greater scheme of things: Musical form in the twelve-note works of Nikos Skalkottas’, In Wanek, Nina-Maria (ed.), Nikos Skalkottas (1904–1949) Zum 100. Geburtstag (Vienna: Der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2006), pp. 71–101.Google Scholar
Mantzourani, Eva, ‘An introduction to Skalkottas's twelve-note compositional processes’, in Nikos Skalkottas: A Greek European (Athens: Benaki Museum, 2008), pp. 88–125.Google Scholar
Mantzourani, Eva, The Life and Twelve-Note Music of Nikos Skalkottas. Farnham: Ashgate, 2011.Google Scholar
Milstein, Silvina, Arnold Schoenberg: Notes, Sets, Forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Schoenberg, Arnold, ‘Problems of Harmony’, Perspectives of New Music, 11/12 (1973), pp. 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoenberg, Arnold, Style and Idea, ed. Stein, Leonard, trans. Black, Leo. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Schoenberg, Arnold, Zusammenhang, Kontrapunkt, Instrumentation, Formenlehre (ZKIF), ed. Neff, Severine, trans. Cross, Charlotte M. and Neff, Severine. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Skalkottas, Nikos, ‘Foreword’ to the Notes of the First Symphonic Suite for large orchestra’ (1935); MS.Google Scholar
Skalkottas, Nikos, ‘Originality and Imitation’, MS essay.Google Scholar
Skalkottas, Nikos, ‘Style’; MS essay.Google Scholar
Skalkottas, Nikos, ‘The Symphony’, MS essay.Google Scholar
Whittall, Arnold, ‘Schoenberg and the English: Notes Towards a Documentary’, Journal of the Arnold Schoenberg Institute, 4/1 (1980), pp. 24–33.Google Scholar
Whittall, Arnold, ‘The Theorist's Sense of History: Concepts of Contemporaneity in Composition and Analysis’, Journal of the Royal Musical Association, 112/1 (1986–87), pp. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittall, Arnold, ‘Webern and Multiple Meaning’ Music Analysis, 6/3 (1987), pp. 333–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittall, Arnold, ‘Overlapping opposites: Schoenberg observed’, In Exploring Twentieth-Century Music (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 73–88.Google Scholar
Wintle, Christopher (ed.), Hans Keller: Essays on Music. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Wintle, Christopher, ‘The Quest for Keller’, The Musical Times, 135 (August, 1994), pp. 487–93.Google Scholar