Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T22:34:59.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Where is the Equinox ?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

W. Fricke
W. Fricke*
Affiliation:
Astronomisches Rechen-Institut, Heidelberg, Germany, F.R.

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Within the work being carried out at Heidelberg on the establishment of the new fundamental reference coordinate system, the FK5, the determination of the location of celestial equator and the equinox form an important part. The plane of the celestial equator defined by the axis of rotation of the Earth and the plane of the ecliptic defined by the motion of the Earth about the Sun are both in motion due to various causes. The intersection of the equator and the ecliptic, the dynamical equinox, is therefore in motion. Great efforts have been made in the past to determine the location and motion of the dynamical equinox by means of observations of Sun, Moon and planets in such a manner that the dynamical equinox can serve as the origin of the right ascension system of a fundamental catalogue. The results have not been satisfactory, and we have some important evidence that the catalogue equinox of the FK4 is not identical with the “dynamical equinox”. Moreover, is has turned out that the difference α(DYN) - α(FK4) = E(T) depends on the epoch of observation T. Duncombe et al. (1974) have drawn attention to the possible confusion between the catalogue equinox and dynamical equinox; they mention the difference between two Earth longitude systems, one established by the SAO using star positions on the FK4 and the other one established by the JPL using planetary positions measured from the dynamical equinox. This is undoubtedly one legitimate explanation of the difference, even if other sources of errors may also have contributed.

Type
Part III: Ephemerides, Equinox and Occultations
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 81: Dynamics of the Solar System , 1979 , pp. 133 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1979 

References

Adams, A.N., Bestul, S.M., Scott, D.K.: 1964, Publ. US Naval Obs. Vol. 19, Part 1 Google Scholar
Auwers, A.: 1888, Neue Reduktion der Bradleyschen Beobachtungen. Dritter Band. St. Petersburg Google Scholar
Bessel, F.W.: 1830, Tabulae Regiomontanae. Regiomonti Prussorum Google Scholar
Blackwell, K.C.: 1977, Monthly Notices R.A.S. 180, 65 P CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boss, L.: 1910, Astron. J. 26, 111 Google Scholar
Boss, L.: 1937, General Catalogue. Carnegie Institution, Washington Google Scholar
Duma, D.P.: 1974, Determination of Zero Points and periodic Errors of Star Catalogues (In Russian). Kiev Google Scholar
Duma, D.P., Koval, R.N.: 1977, Pis'ma Astron. Zh. 3, 238 (English transl. Sov. Astron. Letters 3 (3) Google Scholar
Duncombe, R.L., Seidelmann, P.K., Van Flandern, T.C.: 1974, In “On Reference Coordinate Systems for Earth Dynamics”. IAU Colloqu. No. 26. p. 223. Eds. Kolaczek, B., Weiffenbach, G. Warsaw, Poland Google Scholar
Fricke, W.: 1967, Astron. J. 72, 1368 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricke, W.: 1971, Astron. Astrophys. 13, 298 Google Scholar
Fricke, W.: 1977, Veröff. Astron. Rechen-Institut, Heidelberg No. 28 Google Scholar
Gavurin, M.K.: 1962, Zh. Mat. Mat. Fiz. 2, 287 Google Scholar
Jackson, E.S.: 1968, Astron. Pap. Washington Vol. 20, Part 1 Google Scholar
Kahrstedt, A.: 1931, Astron. Nachr. 244, 33 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Küstner, F.: 1902, Astron. Nachr. 158, 129 Google Scholar
Laubscher, R.E.: 1976, Astron. Astrophys. 51, 13 Google Scholar
Morgan, H.R.: 1952, Astron. Pap. Washington Vol. 13, Part 3 Google Scholar
Nemiro, A.A., Plyugina, A.I., Tavastsherna, K.N., Shishkina, V.I.: 1977, Trudy Glav. Astron. Obs. Pulkovo, Ser. 2, Vol. 82, 4 Google Scholar
Newcomb, S.: 1872, Washington Observations for 1870. App. III. Washington Google Scholar
Newcomb, S.: 1882, Astron. Pap. Washington Vol. 1, Part 4 Google Scholar
Newcomb, S.: 1895, The Elements of the Four Inner Planets and the Fundamental Constants of Astronomy, p. 96. Washington Google Scholar
Newcomb, S.: 1898, Astron. Pap. Washington Vol. 8, Part 1 Google Scholar
Newcomb, S.: 1899, Astron. Pap. Washington Vol. 8, Part 2 Google Scholar
Nikol'skaya, T.K.: 1972, Bull. Inst. Theor. Astron. 13, 148 Google Scholar
Nowacki, H.: 1935, Astron. Nachr. 255, 301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiz, A.: 1951, Annals Obs. Lund No. 11 Google Scholar
Van Flandern, T.C.: 1971, Astron. J. 76, 81 CrossRefGoogle Scholar