Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T05:17:51.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

UBV Photometry of Mars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

A. T. Young*
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, Calif., U.S.A.cor1corresp
*

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A critical analysis of selected high-quality photometric observations of Mars indicates that: (1) The phase function is concave upward out to at least 40° phase. No sudden brightening occurs at opposition, but the curvature increases at small phase. (2) Large systematic differences (0.1–0.2 mag.) exist between different observers' data. However, the small random scatter attributable to Mars (0.01–0.02 mag.) in the better series suggests that these differences represent systematic errors in data reduction, not variations in the planet's brightness. (3) The disentangling of seasonal, diurnal, and phase effects leaves considerable ambiguity; more observations are needed, over a long time, with a stable instrumental system. However, even the present data are sufficient to expose substantial errors in published phase curves of Mars (and consequently, in interpretations based on them).

Type
Part II Terrestrial Planets
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1974 

References

Cousins, A. W. J. and Stoy, R. H.: 1963, Roy. Obs. Bull., No. 64.Google Scholar
De Vaucouleurs, G.: 1960, Planetary Space Sci. 2, 26.Google Scholar
Egan, W. G. and Foreman, K. M.: 1971, in Sagan, C., Owen, T. C., and Smith, H. J. (eds.), ‘Planetary Atmospheres’, IAU Symp. 40, 156.Google Scholar
Fernie, J. D. and Watt, V.: 1967, Astrophys. J. 150, L113.Google Scholar
Guthnick, P. and Prager, R.: 1914, Veröff. Kgl. Sternw. Berlin-Babelsberg 1, 1.Google Scholar
Ingersoll, A. P.: 1971, in Sagan, C., Owen, T. C., and Smith, H. J. (eds.), ‘Planetary Atmospheres’, IAU Symp. 40, 170.Google Scholar
Irvine, W. M., Simon, T., Menzel, D. H., Charon, J., Lecomte, G., Griboval, P., and Young, A. T.: 1968a, Astron. J. 73, 251.Google Scholar
Irvine, W. M., Simon, T., Menzel, D. H., Pikoos, C., and Young, A. T.: 1968b, Astron. J. 73, 807.Google Scholar
Johnson, H. L. and Gardiner, A. J.: 1955, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 67, 74.Google Scholar
Johnson, H. L., Mitchell, R. I., Iriarte, B., and Wisniewski, W. Z.: 1966, Comm. Lunar Planet. Lab. 4, No. 63.Google Scholar
Lawrence, L. C. and Reddish, V. C.: 1965, Publ. Roy. Obs. Edinburgh 3, No. 9, 280.Google Scholar
Mead, J. M.: 1971, in Sagan, C., Owen, T. C., and Smith, H. J. (eds.), ‘Planetary Atmospheres’, IAU Symp. 40, 166.Google Scholar
Meiller, V.: 1964, U.S. Naval Obs. Circ., No. 98, 1964.Google Scholar
O'Leary, B. T.: 1967a, Technical Report on NASA Grant NsG 101–61, Space Sciences Laboratory Series 8, Issue 103 (, Astronomy Department, University of Calif., Berkeley).Google Scholar
O'Leary, B. T.: 1967b, Astrophys. J. Letters 149, L147.Google Scholar
O'Leary, B. T. and Rea, D. G.: 1968, Icarus 9, 405.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Kaler, T.: 1961, Observatory 81, 246.Google Scholar
Shao, C. Y., and Young, A. T.: 1965, Astron. J. 70, 726.Google Scholar
Shobbrock, R. R., Herbison-Evans, D., Johnston, I. D., and Lomb, N. R.: 1969, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 145, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, A. T.: 1957, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 69, 568.Google Scholar
Young, A. T.: 1963, Appl. Opt. 2, 51.Google Scholar
Young, A. T.: 1966, Observatory 86, 71.Google Scholar
Young, A. T. and Irvine, W. M.: 1967, Astron. J. 72, 945.Google Scholar
Young, A. T.: 1969, Appl. Opt. 8, 869.Google Scholar
Young, A. T. and Collins, S. A.: 1971, J. Geophys. Res. 76, 432.Google Scholar
Young, A. T.: 1973, in Methods of Experimental Physics, Academic Press, New York, Vol. 12A, Chapter 3.Google Scholar