Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T19:50:46.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Type Ib/c Supernovae and their Relation to Binary Stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

Bruno Leibundgut
Bruno Leibundgut*
Affiliation:
European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Strasse 2, D-85478 Garching, Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The present understanding of type Ib/c supernovae and their connection to interacting binaries is reviewed. The problems of the classification and the lack of well-observed events exclude direct inference of progenitor characteristics. The absence of hydrogen lines in the observed spectrum, nevertheless, requires restricted evolutionary schemes to produce suitable progenitor stars for core collapse explosions with no hydrogen envelope. New relative statistics among the supernova types are presented which indicate that SN Ib/c are on average brighter than SN II, and with the dense sampling of supernova searches in nearby galaxies, a small intrinsic incidence of SN Ib/c is determined. The small rates might be in conflict with the observed ratio of massive stars in binaries in the Galaxy.

Type
2 Supernovae in Binaries
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 165: Compact Stars in Binaries , 1996 , pp. 107 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1996 

References

Aldering, G., Humphreys, R.M. & Richmond, M. 1994, AJ 107, 662.Google Scholar
Barbon, R., Cappellaro, E. & Turatto, M. 1989, A&AS 81, 421.Google Scholar
Cappellaro, E. et al. 1993, A&A 273, 383.Google Scholar
Elias, J.H. et al. 1985, ApJ 196, 379.Google Scholar
Filippenko, A.V. 1988, AJ 96, 1941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filippenko, A.V. 1992, ApJ 384, L37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filippenko, A.V. & Sargent, W.L.W. 1986 AJ, 691.Google Scholar
Filippenko, A.V., Matheson, T. & Barth, A.J. 1994 AJ, 108, 2220.Google Scholar
Filippenko, A.V., Porter, A.C. & Sargent, W.L.W. 1990, AJ 100, 1575.Google Scholar
Fransson, C., Lundqvist, P. & Chevalier, R.A. 1994, ApJ (in press).Google Scholar
Hamuy, M. et al. 1993, AJ 106, 2392.Google Scholar
Hamuy, M. et al. 1992, IAU Circ. 5574.Google Scholar
Hamuy, M. et al. 1995, AJ (January 1995 issue).Google Scholar
Harkness, R. P. & Wheeler, J.C. 1990, in Supernovae , Petschek, A.G. (Ed.), Springer (New York), p. 1.Google Scholar
Harkness, R.P. et al. 1987, ApJ 317, 355.Google Scholar
Jeffery, D.J. et al. 1991, ApJ 377, L89.Google Scholar
Kirshner, R. P. et al. 1994, IAU Circ. 5981.Google Scholar
Leibundgut, B. 1994, in The Lives of Neutron Stars , Alpar, M.A., Kιzιloglu, Ü. & van Paradijs, J. (Eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, (in press).Google Scholar
Lewis, J.R. et al. 1994, MNRAS 266, L27.Google Scholar
Muller, R.A. et al. 1992, ApJ 384, L9.Google Scholar
Nomoto, K., Filippenko, A.V. & Shigeyama, T. 1990 A&A, 240, L1.Google Scholar
Nomoto, K. et al. 1993, Nat 364, 507.Google Scholar
Nomoto, K. et al. 1994, Nat 371, 227.Google Scholar
Patat, F. et al. 1994, A&A 282, 731.Google Scholar
Patat, F., Chugai, N. & Mazzali, P.A. 1995, A&A (submitted).Google Scholar
Panagia, N. 1984, Proc. 4th European IUE Conference, ESA SP-218.Google Scholar
Panagia, N. 1985, in Supernovae as Distance Indicators , Bartel, N. (Ed.), Springer (Berlin), p. 14.Google Scholar
Panagia, N. & Laidler, V.G. 1991, in Supernovae , Woosley, S.E. (Ed.), Springer (New York), p. 559.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, S. et al. 1989, in Particle Astrophysics: Forefront Experimental Issues , Norman, E.B. (Ed.), World Scientific (Singapore), p. 196.Google Scholar
Richter, O.-G. & Rosa, M. 1988, A&A 206, 219.Google Scholar
Schlegel, E.M. & Kirshner, R.P. 1989, AJ 98, 577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strom, R. 1994, in The Lives of the Neutron Stars , Alpar, M.A., Kιzιloglu, Ü. & van Paradijs, J. (Eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers (in press).Google Scholar
Swartz, D.A. & Wheeler, J.C. 1991, ApJ 379, L13.Google Scholar
Swartz, D.A. et al. 1993, ApJ 411, 313.Google Scholar
Treffers, R.R. et al. 1994, in Robotic Telescopes , Henry, G. (Ed.), Astron. Soc. Pacific (in press).Google Scholar
Uomoto, A. & Kirshner, R.P. 1985, A&A 149, L7.Google Scholar
Vacca, W. D. & Leibundgut, B. 1995, (in preparation).Google Scholar
van den Bergh, S. & McClure, R.D. 1994, ApJ 425, 205.Google Scholar
van den Bergh, S. & Tammann, G.A. 1991, ARA&A 29, 36.Google Scholar
Van den Heuvel, E.P.J. 1994, in Interacting Binaries , Nussbaumer, H. & Orr, A. (Eds.), Springer (Berlin), p. 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dyk, S.D. 1992, AJ 103, 1788.Google Scholar
Van Dyk, S.D. et al. 1993, ApJ 419, L69.Google Scholar
Wheeler, J.C. & Filippenko, A.V. 1994, in Supernovae and Supernova Remnants , McCray, R. (Ed.), Cambridge University Press (in press).Google Scholar
Wheeler, J.C. & Levreault, R., 1985, ApJ 294, L17.Google Scholar
Wheeler, J.C. et al. 1994, ApJ (in press).Google Scholar
Woosley, S.E., Langer, N. & Weaver, T.A. 1993, ApJ 411, 823.Google Scholar
Woosley, S.E. et al. 1994a, ApJ 429, 300.Google Scholar
Woosley, S.E., Langer, N. & Weaver, T.A. 1994b, ApJ (in press).Google Scholar