Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T10:21:04.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Time-Resolved CCD-Photometry of Planetary Nebula Nuclei

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2017

M. M. Roth
Affiliation:
Universitäts–Sternwarte München, Scheinerstr. 1, 8000 München 80, FRG
T. Soffner
Affiliation:
Universitäts–Sternwarte München, Scheinerstr. 1, 8000 München 80, FRG
W. Mitsch
Affiliation:
Universitäts–Sternwarte München, Scheinerstr. 1, 8000 München 80, FRG

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The enormous potential of direct imaging CCDs with respect to stellar photometry was soon discovered after these detectors became available for standard instrumentation at modern telescopes. Among favourable properties like high quantum efficiency, linearity, and large dynamic range the multiplexing advantage of the 2-dimensional detector has permitted to perform quantitative work that otherwise would have been impossible with classical photoelectric photometry. Striking examples for this are the progress in constructing colour magnitude diagrams for globular clusters (see e.g. Hesser et al. 1987, their Fig.9) or the high precision (down to the mmag level) achieved in differential photometry on ensembles of stars (Gilliland and Brown 1988). Several groups have also used CCDs for time series measurements employing specialized instruments and/or proper observing strategies (Dunham et al. 1985, Howell and Jacoby 1986, Stover and Allen 1987). If high time resolution (on the order of seconds or less) is required, however, the photoelectric method is still superior to CCDs mainly because of problems like data rates and readout time overhead (Barwig 1987).

Type
V. Planetary Nebulae Connection: Evolution to White Dwarfs
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1993 

References

Barwig, H., Schoembs, R., Buckenmayer, C., 1987, A&A 175, 327 Google Scholar
Bond, H.E. et al., 1992, in preparation Google Scholar
Dunham, E.W. et al., 1985, PASP 97, 1196 Google Scholar
Gilliand, R.L. and Brown, T.M., 1988, PASP 100, 754 Google Scholar
Hesser, J.E. et al., 1987, PASP, 99, 739 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, S.B. and Jacoby, G.H., 1986, PASP 98, 802 Google Scholar
Roth, M.M., 1990, in: CCDs in Astronomy, ed. Jacoby, G.H., ASP Conf. Ser., p. 380 Google Scholar
Roth, M.M., Soffner, T., Hoffmüller, J., 1991, in: Proc. 3rd ESO/ST-ECF Data Analysis Workshop, ed. Grosb⊘l, P.J. and Warmels, R.H., p. 107 Google Scholar
Stover, R.J. and Allen, S.A., 1987, PASP 99, 877 CrossRefGoogle Scholar