Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T00:36:34.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Special session on recent advances in nebular diagnostics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2016

Daniel Schaerer ,
Paul A. Crowther  and
M. S. Oey
Daniel Schaerer
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Astrophysique, Observatoire de Midi-Pyrénées, 14 Avenue E. Belin, F-31400 Toulouse, la France
Paul A. Crowther
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
M. S. Oey
Affiliation:
Lowell Observatory, 1400 West Mars Hill Road, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Nebular emission-line spectra offer fundamental tests for models of stellar atmospheres, and ultimately, they offer important probes of massive star properties in situations where the stars themselves are unresolved or obscured. Presentations in the first half of this special session focused on the impact of revised stellar properties for O-type and Wolf-Rayet stars on the effective temperature scale and on their Lyman continuum fluxes, whilst the second half emphasized the relationship of nebular diagnostics with stellar atmospheres.

Type
Part 6. Reports On Special Sessions
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 212: A Massive Star Odyssey: From Main Sequence to Supernova , 2003 , pp. 777 - 780
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2003 

References

Bresolin, F., Kennicutt, R. 2002, ApJ 572, 838.Google Scholar
Castellanos, M., Díaz, Á.I., Terlevich, E. 2002, MNRAS 329, 315.Google Scholar
Crowther, P.A., Hillier, D.J., Evans, C.J., et al. 2002, ApJ 579, 774.Google Scholar
Gabler, R., Gabler, A., Kudritzki, R.-P., Méndez, R.H. 1992, A&A 265, 656.Google Scholar
Garnett, D.R., Galarza, V.C., Chu, Y.-H. 2000, ApJ 545, 251.Google Scholar
Giveon, U., Sternberg, A., Lutz, D., et al. 2002, ApJ 566, 880 (Errratum: ApJ 575, 585).Google Scholar
Herrero, A., Puls, J., Najarro, F. 2002, A&A 396, 949.Google Scholar
Hillier, D.J., Miller, D.L. 1998, ApJ 496, 407.Google Scholar
Martins, F., Schaerer, D., Hillier, D.J. 2002, A&A 382, 999.Google Scholar
Morisset, C., Schaerer, D., Martín-Hernández, N.L., et al. 2002a, A&A 386, 558.Google Scholar
Pauldrach, A.W., Hoffmann, T.L., Lennon, M. 2001, A&A 375, 161.Google Scholar
Schaerer, D., de Koter, A. 1997, A&A 322, 598.Google Scholar
Smith, L.J., Norris, R.P., Crowther, P.A. 2002, MNRAS 337, 1309.Google Scholar
Stasińska, G., Testor, G., Heydari-Malayeri, M. 1986, A&A (Letters) 170, L4.Google Scholar
Zurita, A., Beckman, J.E., Rozas, M., Ryder, S. 2002, A&A 386, 801.Google Scholar