Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T14:43:34.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pulsar Astrometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

Joseph H. Taylor
Affiliation:
Joseph Henry Laboratories and Physics Department Princeton University Princeton, N. J. 08544 U.S.A.
Carl R. Gwinn
Affiliation:
Joseph Henry Laboratories and Physics Department Princeton University Princeton, N. J. 08544 U.S.A.
Joel M. Weisberg
Affiliation:
Joseph Henry Laboratories and Physics Department Princeton University Princeton, N. J. 08544 U.S.A.
Lloyd A. Rawley
Affiliation:
Joseph Henry Laboratories and Physics Department Princeton University Princeton, N. J. 08544 U.S.A.

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

High precision measurements of the celestial coordinates of pulsars are desirable for a number of reasons. If carried out at several epochs, the measurements can yield angular proper motions; together with distance estimates based on dispersion measure, the proper motion of a pulsar reveals two of three components of its space velocity, and consequently provides important kinematic information on pulsar ages (see, for example, Manchester, Taylor and Van 1974; Lyne, Anderson and Salter 1982; and references therein). Direct measurements of annual parallaxes are also possible in principle, and are marginally feasible with present techniques for a few of the closest pulsars. Model independent distances obtained from parallax measurements, together with observed pulsar dispersion measures, yield the electron density along the line of sight to the pulsar. Knowledge of the interstellar electron density in the solar neighborhood provides a calibration of the dispersion-based distance scale that is complementary to the calibration derived from neutral hydrogen absorption measurements of more distant pulsars (Weisberg et al. 1980), and permits appropriate statistical analyses to be made of the local space density of pulsars and their birthrate (e.g. Taylor and Manchester 1977). Finally, pulsar astrometry can be expected to yield important information on the relative orientations of fundamental reference frames. In particular, pulse timing observations yield positions in a reference frame based on motions of the planets, while interferometric position measurements are based on an Earth-equatorial system. At present the relative orientation of these two coordinate systems is known to only accuracy, though the potential precision of both types of measurements is much higher.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1984 

References

Backer, D. C. and Sramek, R. A.: 1981, Pulsars, IAU Symposium No. 95, ed. Sieber, W. and Wielebinski, R., Dordrecht: Reidel, p. 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backer, D. C. and Sramek, R. A.: 1982, Astrophys. J. 260, 512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, G. S. and Reichley, P. E.: 1983, Astrophys. J. (Supplement Series), in press.Google Scholar
Gullahorn, G. E. and Rankin, J. M.: 1978a, Astron. J. 83, 1219 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gullahorn, G. E. and Rankin, J. M.: 1978b, Astrophys. J. 225, 963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfand, D. J., Taylor, J. H., Backus, P. R. and Cordes, J. M.: 1980, Astrophys. J. 237, 206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klobuschar, J. A.: 1975, Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratory, report number AFCRL-TR-75-0502.Google Scholar
Lyne, A. G., Anderson, B. and Salter, M. J.: 1982, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 201, 503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manchester, R. M. and Taylor, J. H.: 1981, Astron. J. 86, 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manchester, R. M., Taylor, J. H. and Van, Y.-Y.: 1974, Astrophys. J. (Letters) 189, L119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, M. J.: 1983, Personal Communication.Google Scholar
Salter, M. J., Lyne, A. G. and Anderson, B.: 1979, Nature 280, 477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. H. and Manchester, R. N.: 1977, Astrophys. J. 215, 885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, J. M., Rankin, J. and Boriakoff, V.: 1980, Astron. Astrophys. 88, 84.Google Scholar