Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T13:47:59.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optical Observations of Nuclei of Galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

Marie-Helene Ulrich*
Affiliation:
Dept. of Astronomy, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Tex. 78712, U.S.A. and Observatoire de Paris, 92190 Meudon, France

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Several problems concerning the nuclei of galaxies are particularly interesting at present, either because new data have become available from advances in observational techniques, or else because recent observations suggest that earlier conclusions should be revised. These problems are discussed in this article.

Spectrophotometry in the near infrared shows that the late-type stars in the nucleus of M31 are mostly late giants; the M/L ratio in the nucleus is approximately 15, a value in agreement with that calculated independently from the velocity dispersion of the stars.

Infrared emission at 10µ has now been detected in 50 galaxies; the Seyfert-type galaxies are the brightest at 10 µ and there is evidence of variations of the 10 µ flux in NGC 4151, which rules out re-radiation by dust as the mechanism of infrared emission. In each of the galaxies NGC 253 and NGC 3034 an infrared source of dimension ~ 200 pc is present in the centre which coincides in position and dimension with the central component of the radio source at 1415 MHz; since both galaxies are rich in dust and in early-type stars it is plausible that, in these cases, re-radiation by dust is the origin of the infrared emission. Most of the other galaxies detected at 10 µ are spirals with intense and narrow emission lines.

Comparison of the optical and radio properties of nuclei of galaxies show that galaxies with compact nuclear radio sources are more likely to have optical spectra with emission lines than are galaxies without central radio sources. This correlation holds for elliptical and spiral galaxies. Its cause is not understood at present.

The relatively accurate profiles now available for the permitted lines of several Seyfert galaxies show that mass motions are the main broadening agent for these lines. Variations of line intensities have been observed in several Seyfert galaxies. The most likely explanation of these variations is that they are due to the variations of the photoionizing flux; in some cases, however, weakening of the permitted lines could be caused by high-velocity mass motions present in the region emitting the broad component of these lines.

From the investigation of the relatively nearby galaxies it is estimated that at least 5 % of galaxies have expansion motions or non-thermal optical fluxes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1974 

References

Adams, T. F.: 1973, Astrophys. J. 179, 417.Google Scholar
Alloin, D.: 1973, Astron. Astrophys. 27, 433.Google Scholar
Alloin, D., Andrillat, Y., and Souffrin, S.: 1971, Astron. Astrophys. 10, 401.Google Scholar
Anderson, K. S.: 1971, Astrophys. J. 169, 449.Google Scholar
Anderson, K. S.: 1973, Astrophys. J. 182, 369.Google Scholar
Andrillat, Y. and Souffrin, S.: 1971, Astron. Astrophys. 11, 286.Google Scholar
Andrillat, Y., Souffrin, S., and Alloin, D.: 1972, Astron. Astrophys. 19, 405.Google Scholar
Bahcall, J. N., Kozlovsky, Ben-Zion, and Salpeter, E. E.: 1972, Astrophys. J. 171, 467.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R. J., Danziger, I. J., Frogel, J. A., and Persson, S. E.: 1973, Astrophys. Letters 14, 1.Google Scholar
Becklin, E. E., Fomalont, E. B., and Neugebauer, G.: 1973, Astrophys. J. Letters, 181, L27.Google Scholar
Bergeron, J. and Souffrin, S.: 1971, Astron. Astrophys. 14, 167.Google Scholar
Blanc-Vaziaga, M-J., Cayrel, G., and Cayrel, R.: 1973, Astrophys. J. 180, 871.Google Scholar
Burbidge, G. R.: 1970, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 8, 369.Google Scholar
Burbidge, E. M. and Burbidge, G. R.: 1964, Astrophys. J. 140, 1445.Google Scholar
Cherepashchuk, A. M. and Lyutyi, V. M.: 1973, Astrophys. Letters 13, 165.Google Scholar
Chincarini, G. and Walker, M. F.: 1967, Astrophys. J. 147, 407.Google Scholar
Code, A. D., Welch, G. A., and Page, T. L.: 1972, in Code, A. D. (ed.), Scientific Results from OAO-2, NASA SP-310, Washington, p. 559.Google Scholar
Collin-Souffrin, S., Alloin, D., and Andrillat, Y.: 1973, Astron. Astrophys. 22, 343.Google Scholar
Courtès, G. and Cruvellier, P.: 1961, Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris 253, 218.Google Scholar
Cromwell, R. and Weymann, R.: 1970, Astrophys. J. Letters 159, 147.Google Scholar
Danielson, R. E., Light, E. A., Schwarzschild, M., and Tomasko, M. G.: 1971, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 4, 230.Google Scholar
Davies, R. D.: 1973, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 161, 25P.Google Scholar
Demoulin, M.-H. and Burbidge, E. M.: 1970, Astrophys. J. 159, 799.Google Scholar
Disney, M. J. and Cromwell, R. H.: 1971, Astrophys. J. Letters 164, 35.Google Scholar
Eilek, J. A., Auman, J. R., Ulrych, T. J., and Walker, G. A. H.: 1973, Astrophys. J. 182, 363.Google Scholar
Ekers, R. D. and Ekers, J. A.: 1973, Astron. Astrophys. 24, 247.Google Scholar
Ekers, R. D.: 1973, private communication.Google Scholar
Faber, S. M.: 1972, Astron. Astrophys. 20, 361.Google Scholar
Faber, S. M.: 1973, Astrophys. J. 179, 731.Google Scholar
Fazio, G. G.: 1972, in Bradt, H. and Giacconi, R. (eds.), ‘X- and Gamma-Ray Astronomy’, IAU Symp. 55, 303.Google Scholar
Frye, G. M., Albats, P. A., Zych, A. D., Staib, J. A., Hopper, V. D., Rawlinson, W. R., and Thomas, J. A.: 1971, Nature 233, 466.Google Scholar
Giacconi, R. 1973, Phys. Today, May, p. 38.Google Scholar
Giacconi, R., Murray, S., Gursky, H., Kellogg, E., Schreier, E., and Tananbaum, H.: 1972, Astrophys. J. 178, 281.Google Scholar
Giacconi, R., Murray, S., Gursky, H., Kellogg, E., Schreier, E., Matilsky, T., Koch, D., and Tananbaum, H.: 1973, Astrophys. J. 188, 667.Google Scholar
Harper, D. A. and Low, F. J.: 1973, Astrophys. J. Letters 182, 89.Google Scholar
Harper, D. A., Low, F. J., Rieke, G., and Armstrong, K. R.: 1972, Astrophys. J. Letters 177, 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humason, M. L., Mayall, N. U., and Sandage, A. R.: 1956, Astron. J. 61, 97.Google Scholar
Johnson, H. M.: 1961, Astrophys. J. 133, 309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khachikian, E. Ye. and Weedman, D. W.: 1971, Astrophys. J. Letters 164, 109.Google Scholar
Kinman, T. D.: 1973, private communication.Google Scholar
Kleinmann, D. E. and Low, F. J.: 1970, Astrophys. J. Letters 161, 203.Google Scholar
Lallemand, A., Duchesne, M., and Walker, M. F.: 1960, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 72, 76.Google Scholar
Lampton, M., Margon, B., Bowyer, S., Mahoney, W., and Anderson, K.: 1972, Astrophys. J. Letters 171, 45.Google Scholar
Lynds, C. R. and Sandage, A. R.: 1963, Astrophys. J. 137, 1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathis, J. S.: 1970, Astrophys. J. 162, 761.Google Scholar
McClure, R. D.: 1969, Astron. J. 74, 50.Google Scholar
McClure, R. D. and van den Bergh, S.: 1968, Astron. J. 73, 313.Google Scholar
Morton, D. C. and Chevalier, R. A.: 1973, Astrophys. J. 179, 55.Google Scholar
Morton, D. C. and Thuan, , Trinh, X.: 1973, Astrophys. J. 180, 705.Google Scholar
Mushotzky, R. F., Solomon, P. M., and Strittmatter, P. A.: 1972, Astrophys. J. 174, 7.Google Scholar
Notni, P., Khachikian, E. Ye., Butslov, M. M., and Gevorkian, G. T.: 1973, Astrofizika 9, 39.Google Scholar
Pastoriza, M. and Gerola, H.: 1970, Astrophys. Letters 6, 155.Google Scholar
Peimbert, M.: 1968, Astrophys. J. 154, 33.Google Scholar
Peimbert, M.: 1973, Private Communication.Google Scholar
Peimbert, M. and Spinrad, H.: 1970, Astrophys. J. 159, 809.Google Scholar
Poveda, A.: 1958, Bol. Obs. Tonantzintla Tacubaya No. 17.Google Scholar
Richstone, D. and Sargent, W. L. W.: 1972, Astrophys. J. 176, 91.Google Scholar
Rieke, G. H. and Low, F. J.: 1972a, Astrophys. J. Letters 176, 95.Google Scholar
Rieke, G. H. and Low, F. J.: 1972b, Astrophys. J. Letters 177, 115.Google Scholar
Rieke, G. H., Harper, D. A., Low, F. J., and Armstrong, K. R.: Astrophys. J. Letters 183 L67.Google Scholar
Rubin, V. C. and Ford, W. K.: 1971, Astrophys. J. 170, 25.Google Scholar
Rubin, V. C., Ford, W. K., and Krishna Kumar, C.: 1973, Astrophys. J. 181, 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandage, A. R., Becklin, E. E., and Neugebauer, G.: 1969, Astrophys. J. 157, 55.Google Scholar
Schwarzschild, M.: 1971, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 3, 243.Google Scholar
Seyfert, C. K.: 1943, Astrophys. J. 97, 28.Google Scholar
Shields, G. A., Oke, J. B., and Sargent, W. L. W.: 1972, Astrophys. J. 176, 75.Google Scholar
Spinrad, H.: 1972, Astrophys. J, 177, 285.Google Scholar
Spinrad, H. and Taylor, B. J.: 1971, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2, 445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinrad, H., Gunn, J. E., Taylor, B. J., McClure, R. D., and Young, J. W.: 1971, Astrophys. J. 164, 11.Google Scholar
Spinrad, H., Smith, H. E., and Taylor, D. J.: 1972, Astrophys. J. 175, 649.Google Scholar
Stein, W. A., Gillett, F. C., and Merrill, K. M.: 1973, Astrophys. J. 187, 213.Google Scholar
Strom, S. E., Strom, K. M., and Carbon, D. F.: 1971, Astron. Astrophys. 12, 177.Google Scholar
Tinsley, B.: 1973, Astrophys. J. Letters 184, 41.Google Scholar
Tinsley, B. M. and Spinrad, H.: 1971, Astrophys. Space Sci. 12, 118.Google Scholar
Tucker, W., Kellogg, E., Gursky, H., Giacconi, R., and Tananbaum, H.: 1973, Astrophys. J. 180, 715.Google Scholar
Ulrich, M.-H.: 1971, Astrophys. J. Letters, 165, 61.Google Scholar
Ulrich, M.-H.: 1972a, Astrophys. J. 174, 483.Google Scholar
Ulrich, M.-H.: 1972b, Astrophys. J. 178, 113.Google Scholar
Ulrich, M.-H.: 1973, Astrophys. J. 181, 51.Google Scholar
Volobuev, S. A., Galper, A. M., Kirillov-Ugryumov, V. G., Luchkov, B. I., and Ozerov, Yu. V.: 1971, Astron. Zh. 48, 1105; Soviet Astron. 15, 879, 1972.Google Scholar
Wampler, E. J.: 1968, Astrophys. J. Letters 154, L53.Google Scholar
Wampler, E. J.: 1971, Astrophys. J. 164, 1.Google Scholar
Warner, J. W.: Astrophys. J. 186, 21.Google Scholar
Weymann, R. J.: 1970, Astrophys. J. 160, 31.Google Scholar
Whitford, A. E.: 1972, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 4, 230.Google Scholar
Wood, D. B.: 1966, Astrophys. J. 145, 36.Google Scholar