Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T11:28:43.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Some Peculiar Features in the Sequences of the Old Open Star Clusters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2017

A. Maeder*
Affiliation:
Geneva Observatory, Switzerland

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In spite of the rather good agreement between the theory of stellar evolution and the observations, there exist some difficulties when one compares closely the sequences of open star clusters and the theoretical isochrones. Several, if not all, of the old open star clusters seem to be concerned, especially those which are accurately measured, namely Praesepe, NGC 2360, 752, 3680 and M67. The problem concerns the gap occuring in the HR diagram at the end of the phase of hydrogen burning in the core; it corresponds to the phase of hydrogen exhaustion (or of overall contraction). The sequence of M67 has been studied by Racine (1971) and Torres-Peimbert (1971). The well apparent gap is located farther from the zero-age main sequence than indicated by the models and the hook towards a larger Teff predicted during this phase is not observed. Differences in chemical composition may not be held responsible for these anomalies. From Torres-Peimbert's models, it may be assumed that neither solar type, nor super metal rich composition are able to reduce the discrepancies. As a further illustration, let us mention the case of NGC 752. In Table I, the main features related to the gap are examined: the disagreement, like in M67, essentially concern features 1 and 2. The observations are based on a recent study of Grenon and Mermillod (1973) and on Bell's data (1972). Bell has also mentioned the existence of discrepancies. As in M67, the gap is too far from the zero-age main sequence and does not present any sudden turning towards a larger Teff.

Type
Part IV Halo and Old Disc Populations
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1974 

References

Bell, R. A.: 1972, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 157, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilke, F. W. W. and Gough, D. O.: 1972, Nature 240, 262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grenon, M. and Mermillod, J. C.: private communication.Google Scholar
Hejlesen, P. M., Jorgensen, H. E., Petersen, J. O., and Romcke, L.: 1972, in Cayrel de Strobel, G. and Delplace, A. M. (eds.), ‘Stellar Ages’, IAU Colloq. 17, XVII-1.Google Scholar
Iben, I.: 1967a, Astrophys. J. 147, 624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iben, I.: 1967b, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 5, 571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Racine, R.: 1971, Astrophys. J. 168, 393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaviv, G. and Salpeter, E. E.: 1973, Astrophys. J. 184, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiegel, E. A.: 1972, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 10, 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres-Peimbert, S.: 1971, Bol. Obs. Tonantzintla Tacubaya 6, 3.Google Scholar