Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T05:17:10.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Numerical Study of the Solar Cycle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

Y. Nakagawa
Y. Nakagawa*
Affiliation:
High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research*, Boulder, Colo., U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Models relevant to numerical studies of the solar cycle are reviewed briefly with discussions of pertinent physical mechanisms. It is suggested that the observed surface activities are secondary in nature and an example of possible non-axisymmetric steady state solutions is given, together with the results of preliminary numerical computations.

Type
Part VII: The Polar Fields of the Sun and the Magnetic Activity Cycle
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 43: Solar Magnetic Fields , 1971 , pp. 725 - 736
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1971 

References

d'Azambuja, M. and d'Azambuja, L.: 1948, Ann. Obs. Meudon 6, fasc. 7.Google Scholar
Babcock, H. D.: 1959, Astrophys. J. 130, 364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babcock, H. W.: 1961, Astrophys. J. 133, 572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, N. H. and Temesvary, S.: 1966, Tables of Convective Stellar Envelope Models , Institute for Space Studies, NASA, New York.Google Scholar
Busse, F.: 1970, Astrophys. J. 159, 629.Google Scholar
Carrington, R. C.: 1858, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 19, 1.Google Scholar
Chandrasekhar, S.: 1961, Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability , Clarendon Press, Oxford, p. 622.Google Scholar
Defouw, R. J.: 1970, Astrophys. J. 161, 55.Google Scholar
Ferraro, V. C. A.: 1937, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 97, 458.Google Scholar
Hale, G. E.: 1908, Astrophys. J. 28, 100, 315.Google Scholar
Hale, G. E.: 1913, Astrophys. J. 38, 27.Google Scholar
Janke, E. and Emde, F.: 1945, Tables of Functions , Dover Publ., New York.Google Scholar
Kato, S.: 1969, Astrophys. J. 157, 827.Google Scholar
Kato, S. and Nakagawa, Y.: 1969, Solar Phys. 10, 476.Google Scholar
Kato, S. and Nakagawa, Y.: 1970, Solar Phys. 14 138.Google Scholar
Krause, F.: 1967, Habilitationschrift , University of Jena.Google Scholar
Leighton, R. L.: 1964, Astrophys. J. 140, 1547.Google Scholar
Leighton, R. L.: 1969, Astrophys. J. 156, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mestel, L.: 1961, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 122, 473.Google Scholar
Minnaert, M.: 1946, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 106, 98.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, Y.: 1970a, Solar Phys. 12, 419.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, Y.: 1970b, Astrophys. Space Sci. 8, 327.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, Y. and Malville, J. M.: 1969, Solar Phys. 9, 102.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, Y. and Swarztrauber, P.: 1969, Astrophys. J. 155, 1111.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, Y. and Trehan, S. K.: 1970, Astrophys. J. 160, 725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, H. W. and Nunn, M. L.: 1951, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 111, 413.Google Scholar
Spörer, G.: 1894, Publ. Potsdam Obs. 10, Part. I, 144.Google Scholar
Wilcox, J. M.: 1971, this volume, p. 744.Google Scholar
Woltjer, L.: 1959a, Astrophys. J. 130, 405.Google Scholar
Woltjer, L.: 1959b, Astrophys. J. 131, 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar