Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-27T20:24:33.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Millisecond Polarized Pulses in Decametre-Wave Radiation from Jupiter and Sun

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

C. H. Barrow*
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, University of the West Indies, Jamaica, W.I.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A new approach is suggested to the problem of the theory of Jovian decametric radiation and physical conditions at the point of origin. This depends upon a comparison of the characteristics of fast pulse decametre-wave radio emission from both Jupiter and the Sun and invokes the deductive procedure which Sagan (1971) has called ‘Propositional Calculus’.

Fast polarized pulses in radiation from Jupiter and the Sun have been studied at fixed frequencies in the range 18 to 26 MHz with time resolutions from one to five msec; a number of similarities between the pulses from both sources have been noted. A comparison of some of the pulse characteristics is being made in order to decide whether or not they are sufficiently alike to be regarded as having a common mechanism of origin at both Jupiter and the Sun. From this ‘decision’ it is proposed to establish boundary conditions for theoretical study. Fast pulses in the Jupiter radiation are generally supposed to be a source phenomenon although their actual mechanism is not understood. The reasons for this are to some extent inferred rather than proven and so, to check the possible (if unlikely) role of the interplanetary medium, observations are also being made using the large 26 MHz array at the University of Florida to search for possible fast pulses in the radiation from the more distant source Taurus A.

Type
Part III Outer Planets and Their Satellites
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1974 

References

Baart, E. E., Barrow, C. H., and Lee, R. T.: 1966, Nature 211, 808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrow, C. H. and Morrow, D. P.: 1968, Astrophys. J. 152, 593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrow, C. H. and Saunders, H.: 1972, Astrophys. Letters 12, 211.Google Scholar
Carr, T. D. and Gulkis, S.: 1969, Ann. Rev. Astron. and Astrophys. 7, 577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodyear, C. C.: 1971, Signals and Information, Butterworth, London.Google Scholar
Mosier, S. R. and Fainberg, J.: 1972, USNC-URSI Meeting, Washington.Google Scholar
Olsson, C. N. and Smith, A. G.: 1966, Science 153, 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagan, C.: 1971, Comments Astrophys. Space Phys. 3, 65.Google Scholar
Slee, O. B. and Gent, H.: 1967, Nature 216, 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torgersen, H.: 1969, Physica Norvegica 3, 195.Google Scholar
Warwick, J. W.: 1967, Space Sci. Rev. 6, 841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar