Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T11:29:50.082Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magnetic Fields in X-Ray Binary Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2017

James C. Kemp*
Affiliation:
Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, H.I. 96822, U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The case for variable magnetic fields, in the range 1–15 kG, in three of the X-ray binary candidate stars, is discussed. We refer to electronic Zeeman polarimetry by Kemp and Wolstencroft (1973a and b) and by Angel et al. (1973). Our detections in Hβ showed: (1) definite magnetic fields, roughly constant over periods of 2 h, in θ2 Orionis and HD 77581; and (2) complex time behavior in HD 153919, with field reversals over periods of ~ 10 min, but with usually small values (≲ 2 kG) as averaged over times of 1–2 h. (Photographic Zeeman spectroscopy is therefore unlikely to show detectable fields, i.e. > 2 kG, in the latter star.) The essentially null results of Angel et al. (1973) in Hβ, in HD 77581 and HD 153919, indicate that the emission is non-magnetic; only the underlying absorption (which is far weaker than the emission in Hβ) shows Zeeman effects. A plot of the Zeeman measure for HD 77581, against the 8.95-day period, is shown: our points are suggestive of periodicity; and the points of Angel et al. (1973) which unfortunately have larger relative error bars, are consistent with the indicated variation and with the general scale of our results.

Type
Part VI Instability Mechanisms
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1974 

References

Angel, J. R. P., McGraw, J. T., and Stockman, H. S. Jr.: 1973, Astrophys. J. Letters 184, L79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, J. C. and Wolstencroft, R. D.: 1973a, Astrophys. J. Letters 182, L43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, J. C. and Wolstencroft, R. D.: 1973b, Astrophys. J. Letters 185, L21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar