Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T23:34:51.898Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Feedback of massive stars on the ISM: a XMM-Newton view of the LMC superbubble N 51D

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2016

Dominik J. Bomans
Affiliation:
Astronomisches Institut, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsstraße 150/NA7, D-44780 Bochum, BRD
Jörn Rossa
Affiliation:
Astronomisches Institut, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsstraße 150/NA7, D-44780 Bochum, BRD
Kerstin Weis
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hügel 69, D-53121 Bonn, BRD
Konrad Dennerl
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik, Giessenbachstraße, D-85748 Garching-bei-München, BRD

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

N 51D (= DEM L 192) appears at first glance as a nearly circular, 120 pc diameter bubble of ionized gas around the LMC OB association LH 54. A deeper look reveals a complex web of filaments and deviations from radial expansion. Using a deep XMM-Newton pointing centered on N 51D we find that diffuse soft X-ray emitting gas fills the whole superbubble as delineated by the Hα filaments. Contrary to recent findings for galactic winds, the correlation between Hα and X-ray surface brightness is not good. The X-ray spectrum of this diffuse gas cannot be fitted with the LMC abundance pattern, but implies an overabundance of at least oxygen and neon, consistent with recent enrichment from supernovae Type II. Some indications for enhanced mixing at the brightest region of the Hα shell and for a beginning outflow of the hot gas were also detected.

Type
Part 4. Feedback from Massive Stars
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2003 

References

de Boer, K.S., Nash, A.G. 1982, ApJ 255, 447.Google Scholar
Bomans, D.J. 2001, Reviews Mod. Astron. 14, 297.Google Scholar
Chu, Y.-H., Mac Low, M.-M. 1990, ApJ 365, 510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, R.D., Elliot, K.H., Meaburn, J.M. 1976, MmRAS 81, 89.Google Scholar
Dennerl, K., Haberl, F., Aschenbach, B., et al. 2001, A&A (Letters) 365, L202.Google Scholar
Dunne, B.C., Points, S.D., Chu, Y.-H. 2001, ApJS 136, 119.Google Scholar
Henize, K.G. 1956, ApJS 2, 315.Google Scholar
Lasker, B.M. 1980, ApJ 239, 65.Google Scholar
Meaburn, J.M., Terrett, D.L. 1980, A&A 89, 126.Google Scholar
Mewe, R., Kaastra, J.S., Liedahl, D.A. 1995, Legacy 6, 16 (MeKaL).Google Scholar
Oey, M.S., Smedley, S.A. 1998, AJ 116, 1263.Google Scholar
Weaver, R., McCray, R., Castor, J., Shapiro, P., Moore, R. 1977, ApJ 218, 377.Google Scholar
Wilcots, E.M. 1994, AJ 107, 1338.Google Scholar