Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T11:25:12.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evolution of the Luminosity Function

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2016

Richard F. Green*
Affiliation:
Kitt Peak National Observatory, National Optical Astronomy Observatories, P. O. Box 26732, Tucson, Arizona 85726-6732

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this review, the currently published, complete, spectroscopically identified samples of quasars are assembled to produce a composite luminosity function, independent of evolutionary assumptions. Two interpretations of the change with cosmic time provide reasonable fits to the data. Luminosity evolution implies a fixed population of host objects, with nuclear luminosity that fades with advancing cosmic time; some dependence of the timescale on intrinsic luminosity is required. Density evolution traces objects of comparable luminosity to find the change in space density, without a requirement of long lifetime. The change in co-moving volume density depends on luminosity; newer data suggest that somewhat stronger evolution is required at the low luminosity end than the models of Schmidt and Green allowed. Caution is advised in drawing direct physical conclusions about the evolution of individual quasars from mathematical representations of ensemble properties.

Type
V. Cosmological Studies, Clustering, Isotropy etc
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1986 

References

Boyle, B.J., Fong, R., Shanks, T. and Peterson, B.A. 1986, Trieste Symposium on “Structure and Evolution of Active Galactic Nuclei”, April, 1985.Google Scholar
Braccesi, A., Zitelli, V., Bonoli, F. and Formiggini, L. 1980, Astr. Ap., 85, 80.Google Scholar
Cavaliere, A., Giallongo, E. and Vagnetti, F. 1985, Ap. J., 296, 402.Google Scholar
Cheney, J.E. and Rowan-Robinson, M. 1981, M.N.R.A.S., 195, 497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, F.Z., Danese, J., De Zotti, G. and Franceschini, A. 1985, M.N.R.A.S., 212, 857.Google Scholar
Crampton, D., Cowley, A.P., and Hartwick, F.D.A. 1986, preprint.Google Scholar
Green, R.F., Schmidt, M. and Liebert, J. 1986, Ap. J. Suppl., in press.Google Scholar
Koo, D.C. 1986 Trieste Symp. on “Structure and Evolution of Active Galactic Nuclei”, April, 1985.Google Scholar
Koo, D.C., Kron, R.G. and Cudworth, K.M. 1986, P.A.S.P., in press.Google Scholar
Lynds, R. and Wills, D. 1972, Ap. J., 172, 531.Google Scholar
Marshall, H.L. 1985, Ap. J., 299, 109.Google Scholar
Marshall, H.L., Avni, Y., Braccesi, A., Huchra, J.P., Tananbaum, H., Zamorani, G. and Zitelli, V. 1984, Ap. J., 283, 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathez, G. 1978, Astr. Ap., 68, 17.Google Scholar
Mitchell, K.J., Warnock, A. III and Usher, P.D. 1984, Ap. J. Lett., 287, L3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrosian, V. 1986, IAU Proc. of the 19th Genl. Assembly, Comm. 47.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. 1968, Ap. J., 151, 393.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. 1974, ESO/SRC/CERN Conf. on Research Programs for the New Large Telescopes, p. 253.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. and Green, R.F. 1983, Ap. J., 269, 352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, I.E. and Nicoll, J.F. 1986, Ap. J., in press.Google Scholar
Turner, E.L., Ostriker, J.P. and Gott, J.R. III 1984, Ap. J., 284, 1.Google Scholar
Usher, P.D., Green, R.F., Huang, K.L., and Warnock, A. III 1983, in “Quasars and Gravitational Lenses”, Proc. of the 24th Liege International Astr. Colloq., Universite de Liege.Google Scholar
Wampler, E.J. and Ponz, D. 1985, Ap. J., 298, 448.Google Scholar
Weedman, D. 1986 Trieste Symp. on “Structure and Evolution of Active Galactic Nuclei”, April, 1985.Google Scholar
Wills, D. 1974, ESO/SRC/CERN Conf. on Research Programs for the New Large Telescopes, p. 275.Google Scholar
Yee, H.K.C. and Green, R.F. 1984, Ap. J., 280, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar