Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T18:54:35.032Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Evolution of the Compact Radio Structure in SS433 Over a 16-Day Period

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

R. T. Schilizzi
Affiliation:
1Netherlands Foundation for Radio Astronomy, Dwingeloo, NL
J. D. Romney
Affiliation:
1Netherlands Foundation for Radio Astronomy, Dwingeloo, NL
R. E. Spencer
Affiliation:
1Netherlands Foundation for Radio Astronomy, Dwingeloo, NL

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

SS433 has been under intensive study for the past five years in almost all wavelength bands of the electromagnetic spectrum. This peculiar object is generally regarded (Beer 1981) as being a binary system composed of a main sequence star losing mass via Roche lobe overflow to a massive accretion disk associated with a compact object, probably a neutron star. The binary period is 13.1 days. Supercritical accretion onto the disk causes about 10−6 M/year of ionised matter to be ejected in the form of jets with a relatively constant velocity of 0.26 c along the disk axis. The disk (or the inner part of it) precesses with a period of about 164 days, although there is evidence that this may not be constant. The half angle of the precession cone is ~20° and its axis lies at an angle of ~80° to the line of sight. The main sequence star loses mass at a rate of 10−4 to 10−6 M/yr into a stellar wind with the result that a relatively dense environment surrounds the binary system.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1984 

References

Abell, G.O., Margon, B. (1979) Nature 279, 701.Google Scholar
Beer, P. (1981) (ed.) Vistas Astron. 25.Google Scholar
Downes, A.J.B., Pauls, T., Salter, C.J., Astr. Astrophys. 103, 227.Google Scholar
Geldzahler, B.J., Pauls, T., Salter, C.J. (1980) Astr. Astrophys. 84, 237.Google Scholar
Hjellming, R.M., Johnston, K.J. (1981a) Nature 290, 100.Google Scholar
Hjellming, R.M., Johnston, K.J. (1981b) Ap. J. 246, L141.Google Scholar
Hjellming, R.M., Johnston, K.J. (1982) Proc. IAU Symp. 97, p.197.Google Scholar
Johnston, K.J. et al (1981) Astron. J. 86, 1377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margon, B., Grandi, S.A., Downes, R.A. (1980) Ap. J. 241, 306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niell, A.E., Lockhart, T.G., Preston, R.A. (1981) Ap. J. 250, 248.Google Scholar
Romney, J.D., Schilizzi, R.T., Fejes, I., Spencer, R.E. (1983) in prep.Google Scholar
Schilizzi, R.T., Miley, G.K., Romney, J.D., Spencer, R.E. (1981) Nature 290, 318.Google Scholar
Schilizzi, R.T., Fejes, I., Romney, J.D., Miley, G.K., Spencer, R.E., Johnston, K.J. (1982) Proc. IAU Symp. 97, p.205.Google Scholar
Schilizzi, R.T., Romney, J.D., Spencer, R.E., Fejes, I. (1983) Proc. Workshop on Astrophys. Jets (Torino) p. 157.Google Scholar
Seaquist, E.R., Gilmore, W.S., Johnston, K.J., Grindlay, J.E. (1982) Ap. J. 260, 220.Google Scholar
Spencer, R.E. (1979) Nature 282, 483.Google Scholar