Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T22:26:47.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Ephemerides: Past, Present and Future

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

P. K. Seidelmann*
Affiliation:
U. S. Naval Observatory, Washington, D. C. 20390

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Over the years there has been a continuing trend toward unification of both the annually printed volumes of ephemerides and the fundamental bases for the ephemerides. Thus, from many completely independent national and private publications, which were based on a multitude of theories, there has developed a continually improving agreement on accurate astronomical constants, planetary, lunar and satellite theories and cooperative methods of printing the annual ephemerides in different languages. This trend is continuing, currently, with the adoption of a new system of astronomical constants in 1976, consideration of revisions of nutation, the planned revision of the A.E. (American Ephemeris and Astronomical Ephemeris) for 1981, and the expected introduction in 1984 of new fundamental planetary and lunar ephemerides based on the new constants and on the FK5. Currently the differences between the printed ephemerides and observations sytematically exceed 2″ for Mars at some times and 6″. for Neptune at all times. It is anticipated that a new set of fundamental theories will be introduced which will be based on a consistent set of astronomical constants and in agreement with the available observational data to the printed accuracy.

Type
Part III: Ephemerides, Equinox and Occultations
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1979 

References

Carpenter, L., 1963, NASA Technical Note D-1898.Google Scholar
Carpenter, L., 1965, NASA Technical Note D-2852.Google Scholar
Carpenter, L., 1966, NASA Technical Note D-3078.Google Scholar
Carpenter, L., 1966, NASA Technical Note D-3168.Google Scholar
Clemence, G. M., 1954, Astron. Pap. Amer. Ephemeris XIII, part V.Google Scholar
Cohen, C. J., Hubbard, E. C. and Oesterwinter, C., 1967 Astron. J. 72, 973.Google Scholar
Corbin, T., 1977, Dissertation, University of Virginia.Google Scholar
Doggett, L. E., Kaplan, G. H., Seidelmann, P. K., 1977, Almanac for Computers, 1978. Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Duncombe, R. L., Fricke, W., Seidelmann, P. K. and Wilkins, G. A., 1977, Proceedings of the Sixteenth General Assembly, Grenoble 1976, p. 56.Google Scholar
Duncombe, R. L. and Seidelmann, P. K., 1978, IAU Colloquium No. 41, Reidel, in press.Google Scholar
Eckert, W. J., Brouwer, D. and Clemence, G. M., 1951, Astron. Pap. Amer. Ephemeris XII.Google Scholar
Jackson, E. S., 1974, Astron. Pap. Amer. Ephemeris XXII, part II.Google Scholar
Kaplan, G. H., Doggett, L. E. and Seidelmann, P. K., 1976, U. S. Naval Observatory Circular 155, Almanac for Computers, 1977, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Klepczynski, W. J., Seidelmann, P. K. and Duncombe, R. L., 1970, Astron. J. 75, 739.Google Scholar
Laubscher, R. E., 1970, Dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
Musen, P. and Carpenter, L., 1963, J. Geophys. Res. 68, 2727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newcomb, S., 1895, Astron. Pap. Amer. Ephemeris VI, part I.Google Scholar
Newcomb, S., 1895-8, Astron. Pap. Amer. Ephemeris VI, part II, III, IV.Google Scholar
Ross, F. E., 1917, Astron. Pap. Amer. Ephemeris IX, part II.Google Scholar
Seidelmann, P. K., 1977, Celestial Mechanics, in press.Google Scholar
Yallop, B. D., 1978, NAO Technical Note No. 46, Royal Greenwich Observatory.Google Scholar
Yallop, B. D., 1954, Improved Lunar Ephemeris 1952-1959, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Yallop, B. D., 1961, Explanatory Supplement, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Yallop, B. D., 1978, Planetary and Lunar Coordinates 1980-1984, Draft Edition, Royal Greenwich Observatory.Google Scholar