Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T09:06:11.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cassegrain echelle spectroscopy with small telescopes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

J. B. Hearnshaw*
Affiliation:
Mt John University Observatory, Department of Physics, University of Canterbury Christchurch, New Zealand

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper comments on the growing use of cassegrain échelle spectrographs for high resolving power astronomical spectroscopy over the last two decades. Some of the theoretical and practical advantages of échelle spectrographs are outlined, as well as some of the problems that arise in their use. Design parameters of some recent échelle spectrographs in various observatories are summarised. A novel use of échelle spectrographs without a cross-dispersing element for radial velocity spectrometry is proposed. The design parameters of a fibre-fed échelle spectrograph that will achieve a resolving power of about 7 × 104 with a 2 arc second input from a 1m telescope are outlined.

Type
III. Spectroscopic Research Programmes
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1986 

References

Angel, J.R.P., Adams, M.T., Boroson, T.A. and Moore, R.L. 1977, Astrophys. J. 218, 776.Google Scholar
Barden, S.C., Ramsey, L.W. and Truax, R.J. 1981, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 93, 154 Google Scholar
Bates, B., McKeith, C.D., Jorden, P.R. and van Breda, I.G. 1985, Astron. Astrophys. 145, 321.Google Scholar
Bhatia, R.K., Swaminathan, R. and Vijas, M.L. 1984, Bull. Astron. Soc. India 12, 79.Google Scholar
Brown, R.A., Hilliard, R.L. and Phillips, A.L. 1982, Appl. Optics 21, 167.Google Scholar
Chaffee, F.H. and Schroeder, D.J. 1976, Ann. Rev. Astron. and Astrophys. 14, 23.Google Scholar
Desikachary, K. and Hearnshaw, J.B. 1982, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 201, 707.Google Scholar
Harrison, G.R. 1949, J. Optical Soc. America 39, 522.Google Scholar
Hearnshaw, J.B. 1977a, Proc. Astron. Soc. Australia 3, 102.Google Scholar
Hearnshaw, J.B. 1977b, Observatory 97, 5.Google Scholar
Hearnshaw, J.B. 1978, Sky and Telescope 56, 6.Google Scholar
Hearnshaw, J.B. 1981, AAS Photo-Bulletin 26, 9.Google Scholar
Kopylov, I.M. and Stechenko, N.V. 1965, Proc. Crimean Astrophys. Observ. 33, 308.Google Scholar
Latham, D.W. 1977, I.A.U. Coll. 40, 45.Google Scholar
Latham, D.W. 1985, I.A.U. Coll. 88.Google Scholar
McClintock, W. 1979, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 91, 712.Google Scholar
McKeith, C.D., Dufton, P.L. and Kane, L. 1978, Observatory 98, 263.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, D.B. 1958, in The Present and Future of the Telescope of Moderate Size, chapter 14, p.205 ed Wood, F. B., Univ. of Pennsylvania Press, from the Univ. of Pennsylvania Symposium of June 1956.Google Scholar
Peterson, R.C. and Title, A.M. 1975, Appl. Optics 14, 2527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, A.K., McMath, R.R. and Mohler, O. 1951, Astron. J. 56, 137.Google Scholar
Ramsey, L.W., Brungardt, C., Huenemoerder, D.P. and Rosenthal, S. 1985 Bull. Amer. Astron. Soc., in press.Google Scholar
Rodgers, A.W. 1985, private communication.Google Scholar
Schiffer, J.G. 1981, Mitt Astron. Gesellscheft 54, 182.Google Scholar
Schneider, N.M., Brown, R.A. and Hunten, D.M. 1985, private communication.Google Scholar
Schroeder, D.J. 1967, Appl. Optics 6, 1976.Google Scholar
Schroeder, D.J. 1974, in Methods of Experimental Physics vol. 12 (part A), chapter 10, p. 463.Google Scholar
Schroeder, D.J. and Anderson, C.M. 1971, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 83, 438.Google Scholar
Spite, M. 1980, Astron, Astrophys. 81, 365.Google Scholar
Tousey, R., Purcell, J.D., Garrett, D.L. 1967, Appl. Optics 6, 365.Google Scholar
Weiss, W.W., Barylak, M., Hron, J. and Schmiedmayer, J. 1981, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 93, 787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar