Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T06:49:45.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Activity and Kinematics of Late M, L, and T Dwarfs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2016

James Liebert*
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA 85721

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The kinematics of late M and certainly L dwarfs indicate that they have a mean age of no more than a few Gyr. This result does not rule out a mix of young brown dwarfs and ZAMS stars. Relative Hα emission strengths begin to decline in the late M dwarfs, even though about 100% of the M7-8 dwarfs show the weaker emission. Both the frequency and likely strength of this emission declines with spectral type among the L's and T's. A larger sample of late M and L dwarfs, which may provide more definitive tests of the kinematic and activity properties, is being assembled from our NStars project.

Two unusual objects, one an M9.5e and the other a T6e, show persistent Hα emission at least an order of magnitude stronger than their counterparts of similar spectral type. If these are hypothesized to be very young stellar objects (≲10 Myr) like some observed in Rho Oph, Sigma Ori and Taurus – evolutionary models would require them to have very low masses: In particular, for an entity to fade to a late T dwarf temperature and luminosity within 10 Myr, its mass should be no more than several Jupiters. This seems implausible for an isolated object not near any obvious site of recent star formation. However, our attempt to show that the emission might be due to accretion in a binary system was unsuccessful.

Type
Part 8. Activity and Weather
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2001 

References

Burgasser, A.J., Kirkpatrick, J.D., Brown, M.E., Reid, I.N., Burrows, A., Liebert, J., Matthews, K., Gizis, J.E., Dahn, C.C., Monet, D.G., Cutri, R.M., and Skrutskie, M.F. 2002a, ApJ, 564, 421 Google Scholar
Burgasser, A., Kirkpatrick, J.D., Reid, I.N., Liebert, J., Gizis, J.E., and Brown, M.E. 2000, AJ, 120, 473 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgasser, A., Liebert, J., Kirkpatrick, J.D., and Gizis, J.E. 2002b, AJ, 123, 2744 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrows, A., Hubbard, W.B., Lunine, J.I. and Liebert, J., 2001 Rev. Mod. Phys. , V. 73, p. 719 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahn, C.C., Harris, H.C., Vrba, F.J., Guetter, H.H., Canzian, B., Henden, A.A., Levine, S.E., Luginbuhl, C.B., Monet, A.K.B., Monet, D.G., Pier, J.R., Stone, R.C., Walker, R.L., Burgasser, A.J., Gizis, J.E., Kirkpatrick, J.E., Liebert, J., and Reid, I.N. 2002, AJ, in press Google Scholar
D'Antona, F., and Mazzitelli, I. 1985, ApJ, 296, 502 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gizis, J.E., Monet, D.G., Reid, I.N., Kirkpatrick, J.D., Liebert, J., and Williams, R.J. 2000, AJ, 120, 1085 Google Scholar
Hawley, S.L., Gizis, J.E., and Reid, I.N. 1996, AJ, 112, 2799 Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, J.D., Allard, F., Bida, T., Zuckerman, B., Becklin, E.E., Chabrier, G. and Baraffe, I. 1999, ApJ, 519, 834 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebert, J., Kirkpatrick, J.D., Reid, I.N., and Fisher, M.D. 1999, ApJ, 519, 345 Google Scholar
Martín, E.L., Basri, G., and Zapatero Osorio, M.R. 1999, AJ, 118, 1005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohanty, S., Basri, G., Shu, F., Allard, F., and Chabrier, G. 2002, ApJ, 571, 469 Google Scholar
Reid, I.N., Kirkpatrick, J.D., Liebert, J., Gizis, J.E., Dahn, C.C., and Monet, D.G. 2002, AJ, 124 519 Google Scholar
Reid, I.N., and Cruz, K.L. 2002, AJ, 123, 2806 Google Scholar
Reipurth, B., and Clarke, C. 2002, AJ, 122, 432 Google Scholar
Schneider, D.E., Greenstein, J.L., Schmidt, M., and Gunn, J.E. 1991, AJ, 102, 1180 Google Scholar