Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T09:14:20.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8.9. MHD simulations of jets from accretion disks: nonsteady jets vs. steady jets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

T. Kudoh
Affiliation:
National Astronomical Observatory, Mitaka, Tokyo 181, Japan
K. Shibata
Affiliation:
National Astronomical Observatory, Mitaka, Tokyo 181, Japan
R. Matsumoto
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Chiba University Inageku, Chiba 263, Japan

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present the results of 2.5-dimensional MHD simulations for jet formation from accretion disks in a situation such that not only ejection but also accretion of disk plasma are also included self-consistently. Although the jets in nonsteady MHD simulations (e.g., Uchida & Shibata 1985, Shibata & Uchida 1986, Matsumoto et al. 1996) have often been referred to as transient phenomena resulting from a special choice of initial conditions, we found that the characteristics of the nonsteady jets are very similar to those of steady jets: (1) The ejection point of the jet, which corresponds to slow magnetosonic point in steady MHD jet theory, is determined by the effective potential which results from the gravitational force and the centrifugal force along a field line (Blandford & Payne 1982). (2) The dependence of the velocity (vz) and mass outflow rate (ω) on the initial magnetic field strength is about ωB0 and vz ∝ (Ω2FB20/ω)1/3, where B0 is an initial poloidal magnetic field strength, and ΩF is an ‘angular velocity of the field line’ which is nearly the same as the Keplerian angular velocity where the jet is ejected. These are consistent with those of 1D steady solution (Kudoh & Shibata 1997), although the explanation is a little complicated in the 2.5D case because of an avalanche-like accretion. We also confirm that the velocity of the jet is of order of the Keplerian velocity of the disk for a wide range of parameters. We conclude that the ejection mechanism of nonsteady jets found in the 2.5-dimensional simulations are understood with a previous theory which is studied on the assumption of steady state even when nonsteady avalanche-like accretions occur along the surface of disks.

Type
Part II. Nuclear Interstellar Medium
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1998 

References

Balbus, S.A., & Hawley, J.F. 1991, ApJ, 376, 214.Google Scholar
Blandford, R. D. & Payne, D. G. 1982, MNRAS, 199, 883.Google Scholar
Kudoh, T., & Shibata, K. 1997, ApJ, 474, 362.Google Scholar
Shibata, K., & Uchida, Y. 1990, PASJ, 42, 39.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, R., Uchida, Y., Hirose, S., Shibata, K., Hayashi, M. R., Ferrari, A., Bodo, G., & Norman, C. 1996, ApJ, 461, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uchida, Y., & Shibata, K. 1985, PASJ, 37, 515.Google Scholar