Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T07:44:23.848Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TRAINING ENGLISH LISTENERS TO IDENTIFY PITCH-ACCENT PATTERNS IN TOKYO JAPANESE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2015

Irina A. Shport Open the ORCID record for Irina A. Shport [Opens in a new window]
Irina A. Shport*
Affiliation:
Louisiana State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The high-variability training paradigm (multiple words, phonetic contexts, and talkers) has been successful for perceptual learning of tone contrasts. Here, it is extended to training native English listeners on Tokyo Japanese pitch-accent contrasts. Participants had no previous experience with lexically contrastive pitch patterns. They learned to identify three pitch patterns in disyllabic Japanese words: 1st-syllable accented, 2nd-syllable accented, and unaccented. Immediate feedback was provided to the training group but not to the control group. The results showed an effect of training on pitch-pattern identification accuracy that was also generalized to new words spoken in new contexts. In contrast, the control group improved only on the 1st-syllable accented pattern. Error analysis suggested that the unaccented pattern is the most difficult to identify. The results are discussed in terms of native language bias and individual bias affecting second language learning in the prosodic domain.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 38 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 739 - 769
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arai, M. (1997). The results of a longitudinal survey on the perception of the Tokyo accent: American learners living in Kyoto. Spoken Japanese language education: Looking to the 21st century (pp. 73–79). Tokyo: The National Language Research Institute.Google Scholar
Ayusawa, T. (1999). Interlanguage studies: Japanese learners’ sound systems. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan, 3, 4–12.Google Scholar
Ayusawa, T. (2003). Acquisition of Japanese accent and intonation by foreign learners. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan, 7, 47–58.Google Scholar
Beckman, M. E. (1986). Stress and non-stress accent. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, M. E., Hirschberg, J., & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2005). The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework. In Jun, S.-A. (Ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology and intonation of phrasing (pp. 9–54). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception. In Bohn, O.-S. & Munro, M. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2010). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1) [Computer software]. Available from http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/.Google Scholar
Chandrasekaran, B., Sampath, P. D., & Wong, P. C. M. (2010). Individual variability in cue-weighting and lexical tone learning. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128, 456–465.Google Scholar
Cooper, A., & Wang, Y. (2012). The influence of linguistic and musical experience on Cantonese word learning. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 131, 4756–4769.Google Scholar
Cutler, A., & Otake, T. (1999). Pitch accent in spoken-word recognition in Japanese. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 1877–1888.Google Scholar
Francis, A. L., Ciocca, V., Ma, L., & Fenn, K. (2008). Perceptual learning of Cantonese lexical tones by tone and non-tone language speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 268–294.Google Scholar
Francis, A. L., Ciocca, V., Wong, K. U., Leung, H. Y., & Chu, C. Y. (2006). Extrinsic context affects perceptual normalization of lexical tone. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 1712–1726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gandour, J. T., & Harshman, R. A. (1978). Crosslanguage differences in tone perception: A multidimensional scaling investigation. Language and Speech, 21, 1–33.Google Scholar
Goss, S. J. (2015). The effects of internal and experience-based factors on the perception of lexical pitch accent by native and nonnative Japanese listeners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
Guion, S. G., & Pederson, E. (2007). Investigating the role of attention in phonetic learning. In Bohn, O.-S. & Munro, M. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning (pp. 57–77). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hallé, P. A., Chang, Y.-C., & Best, C. T. (2004). Identification and discrimination of Mandarin Chinese tones by Mandarin Chinese vs. French listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 395–421.Google Scholar
Hirano-Cook, E. (2011). Japanese pitch accent acquisition by learners of Japanese: Effects of training on Japanese accent instruction, perception, and production (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Hirata, E., Ayusawa, T., Nakagawa, C., & Odaka, K. (1997). Longitudinal study of the effects of prosodic education as seen in the results of the Tokyo Japanese Accent Listening Test. Spoken Japanese language education: Looking to the 21st century (pp. 61–72). Tokyo: The National Language Research Institute.Google Scholar
Hirata, Y. (1999). Acquisition of Japaneser rhythm and pitch accent by English native speakers (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
Ito, K., & Speer, S. R. (2008). Anticipatory effects of intonation: Eye movements during instructed visual search. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 541–573.Google Scholar
Iverson, P., & Evans, B. G. (2009). Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems II: Auditory training for native Spanish and German speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126, 866–877.Google Scholar
Iverson, P., Hazan, V., & Bannister, K. (2005). Phonetic training with acoustic cue manipulations: A comparison of methods for teaching English /r/-/l/ to Japanese adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 3267–3278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khouw, E., & Ciocca, V. (2007). Perceptual correlates of Cantonese tones. Journal of Phonetics, 35, 104–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitahara, M. (2001). Category structure and function of pitch accent in Tokyo Japanese (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. K., & Iverson, P. (1995). Linguistic experience and the Perceptual Magnet Effect. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 121–154). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Lee, C.-Y., Tao, L., & Bond, Z. S. (2009). Speaker variability and context in the identification of fragmented Mandarin tones by native and non-native listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 37, 1–15.Google Scholar
Lively, S. E., Logan, J. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94, 1242–1255.Google Scholar
Masaki, A., Takasawa, M., & Arai, T. (2001). Akzentwahrnehmung von Japanern bei technisch kontrollirten F0-Konturen [Accent perception by Japanese listeners in manipulated F0 Contours]. Sophia Linguistica: Working Papers in Linguistics, 48, 213–224.Google Scholar
NHK (1998). Nihongo hatsuon akusento jiten [Pronunciation and accent dictionary of Japanese]. Tokyo: Japan Broadcast Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Nishinuma, Y. (1997). Perception of Japanese accent by American and French learners: First language intervention. Spoken Japanese language education: Looking to the 21st century (pp. 5–12). Tokyo: The National Language Research Institute.Google Scholar
Nishinuma, Y., Arai, M., & Ayusawa, T. (1996). Perception of tonal accent by Americans learning Japanese. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. Philadelphia, PA: Conference Organizing Committee. Available at http://www.isca-speech.org/archive/icslp_1996.Google Scholar
Perrachione, T. K., Lee, J., Ha, L. Y. Y., & Wong, P. C. M. (2011). Learning a novel phonological contrast depends on interactions between individual differences and training paradigm design. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130, 461–472.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. B., & Beckman, M. E. (1988). Japanese tone structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sekiguchi, T., & Nakajima, Y. (1999). The use of lexical prosody for lexical access of the Japanese language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 439–454.Google Scholar
Shport, I. (2014). Variation in prosodic phonology: Individual differences in production of the pitch-accent contrast. In Gussenhoven, C., Chen, Y., and Dediu, D. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages (pp. 104–107). Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Conference Organizing Committee. Accessible at http://www.isca-speech.org/archive/tal_2014/.Google Scholar
Shport, I. A. (2015). Perception of acoustic cues to Tokyo Japanese pitch-accent contrasts in native Japanese and naïve English listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138, 307–318. doi:10.1121/1.4922468.Google Scholar
So, C. K., & Best, C. T. (2010). Cross-language perception of non-native tonal contrasts: Effects of native phonological and phonetic influences. Language and Speech, 53, 273–293.Google Scholar
Sugito, M. (1982a). Kakō onchō to akusento-gata no chikaku [Perception of falling intonation and accentual patterns]. Nihongo akusento no kenkyū [Studies on Japanese accent] (pp. 135–146). Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
Sugito, M. (1982b). Tōkyō akusento ni okeru “hana” to “hana” no sēsē to chikaku [The production and perception of “flower” and “nose” with Tokyo accent]. Nihongo akusento no kenkyū [Studies on Japanese accent] (pp. 182–201). Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
Sugiyama, Y. (Ed.). (2012). The production and perception of Japanese pitch accent. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Vance, T. J. (1995). Final accent vs. no accent: Utterance-final neutralization in Tokyo Japanese. Journal of Phonetics, 23, 487–499.Google Scholar
Venditti, J. J. (2005). The J-ToBI model of Japanese Intonation. In Jun, S.-A. (Ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology and intonation of phrasing (pp. 172–200). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ueyama, M. (2000). Prosodic transfer: An acoustic study of L2 English vs. L2 Japanese (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Spence, M. M., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. A. (1999). Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 3649–3658.Google Scholar
Wayland, R. P., & Guion, S. G. (2004). Training English and Chinese listeners to perceive Thai tones: A preliminary report. Language Learning, 54, 681–712.Google Scholar
Wong, P. C. M., & Perrachione, T. K. (2007). Learning pitch patterns in lexical identification by native English-speaking adults. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 565–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar