Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T00:16:30.650Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Acquisition of Second Language Speech

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Jonathan Leather  and
Allan James
Jonathan Leather
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam
Allan James
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

From being a relatively neglected area in the study of second language learning, the acquisition of second language speech has emerged over the last decade as an important research field with a wide range of approaches; the traditions of articulatory, acoustic, perceptual, phonetic, phonological, and psycholinguists investigation contribute a rare interdisdplinarity to this area of linguistic inquiry. Current scholarly interest augurs well for future theoretical advances.

Type
State of the art
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , September 1991 , pp. 305 - 341
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abercrombie, D. (1963). Problems and principles in language study (2nd ed). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Abramson, A., & Lisker, L. (1970). Discriminability along the voicing continuum: Cross-language tests. In Hála, B., Romportal, M., & Janota, P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 569–573). Prague: Academia.Google Scholar
Adams, J. A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 111–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Altenberg, E. P., & Vago, R. M. (1983). Theoretical implications of an error analysis of second language phonology production. Language Learning, 33, 427–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. L. (1983). The markedness differential hypothesis and syllable structure difficulty. In Nathan, G. S. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Conference on the Uses of Phonology (pp. 85–99). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.Google Scholar
André, E.. (1974). The perception of foreign language speech at the pre-meaning level. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
Archangeli, D. (1984). Underspecification in Yalwemani phonology and morphology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston.Google Scholar
Ashby, M. (1990). Prototype categories in phonetics. Speech, Hearing, and Language: Work in Progress (University College, London), 4, 19–28.Google Scholar
Asher, J., & Garcia, R. (1969). The optimal age to learn a foreign language. Modern Language Journal, 53, 334–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, C. J. N. (1978). Native accent and learning English as a foreign language. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 16, 229–240.Google Scholar
Barroso, F. (1983). An approach to the study of attentional components in auditory tasks. Journal of Auditory Research, 23, 157–180.Google Scholar
Barry, W. J. (1974a). Language background and perception of foreign accent. Journal of Phonetics, 2, 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, W. J. (1974b). Perzeption und Produktion im sub-phonemischen Bereich. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, W. J., & Fourcin, A. J. (1990). Levels of labelling. Speech, Hearing, and Language: Work in Progress (University College, London), 4, 29–44.Google Scholar
Beebe, L. M. (1980). Sociolinguistic variation and style shifting in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 30, 433–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, B. (1988). Universal preference for the open syllable as an independent process in interlanguage phonology. Language Learning, 38, 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, C., McRoberts, G., & Sithole, N. (1988). Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 345–360.Google Scholar
Bluhme, H (1969). Zur Perzeption deutscher Sprachlaute durch englischsprechende Studenten. Phonetica, 20, 57–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumstein, S. E, & Stevens, K. N. (1979). Acoustic invariance in speech production: Evidence from measurements of the spectral characteristics of stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66, 1001–1017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bohn, O.-S., & Flege, J. E. (1990). Perception and production of a new vowel category by adult second language learners. In Leather, J. & James, A. (Eds.), New Sounds 90: Proceedings of the Amsterdam Symposium on the Acquisition of Second-Language Speech (pp. 37–56). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Bohn, O.-S., & Flege, J. E. (forthcoming). Perception switching in Spanish/English bilinguals: Evidence for universal factors in stop voicing judgments. Journal of Phonetics.Google Scholar
Bond, Z. S, & Adamescu, L. (1979). Identification of novel phonetic segments by children, adolescents and adults. Phonetica, 36, 182–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borden, G. J. (1979). An interpretation of research on feedback interruption in speech. Brain and Language, 7, 307–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borden, G. J. (1980). Use of feedback in established and developing speech. In Lass, N. (Ed.), Speech and Language (Vol. 3, pp. 233–249). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Borden, G. J., Harris, K. S., Fitch, H., & Yoshioka, H. (1981). Producing relatively unfamiliar speech gestures: A synthesis of perceptual targets and production rules. Status Report on Speech Research (Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT), 66, 85–117.Google Scholar
Brennan, E. M, & Brennan, J. S. (1981). Accent scaling and language attitudes: Reactions to Mexican American English speech. Language and Speech, 24, 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brière, E. (1968). A psycholinguistic study of phonological interference. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broselow, E. (1983). Non-obvious transfer: On predicting epenthesis errors. In Gass, S. & Selinker, L. (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning (pp. 269–280). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Broselow, E. (1984). An investigation of transfer in second language phonology. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 253–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broselow, E., & Finer, D. (1991). Parameter setting in second language phonology and syntax. Second Language Research, 7, 35–59.Google Scholar
Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. M. (1986). Towards an articulatory phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 219–252.Google Scholar
Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. M. (1989). Gestural structures and phonological patterns. Status Report on Speech Research (Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT), 97–98, 1–23.Google Scholar
Brown, H. D. (1980). The optimal distance model of second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 14, 157–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canetta, J. B. (1977). Decline in oral perception from 20 to 70 years. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 45, 1028–1030.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caramazza, A., Yeni-Komshian, G. H., Zurif, E. B., & Carbone, E. (1973). The acquisition of a new phonological contrast: The case of stop consonants in French English bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54, 421–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carney, A., Widin, G., & Viemeister, N. (1977). Noncategorical perception of stop consonants differing in VOT. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62, 961–970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catford, J. C., & Pisoni, D. B. (1970). Auditory vs. articulatory training in exotic sounds. Modern Language Journal, 54, 477–481.Google Scholar
Chamot, A. U. (1973). Phonological problems in learning English as a third language. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 11, 243–250.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Christophersen, P. (1973). Second language learning: Myth and reality. Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin.Google Scholar
Clyne, M. (Ed.). (1981). Foreigner talk (International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 28). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Cochrane, R. M., (1980). The acquisition of /r/ and /I/ by Japanese children learning English as a second language. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1, 331–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochrane, R. M, & Sachs, J. (1979). Phonological acquisition in children and adults. Language and Speech, 22, 145–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruz-Ferreira, M. (1987). Non-native interpretive strategies for intonational meaning: An experimental study. In James, A. & Leather, J. (Eds.), Sound patterns in second language acquisition (pp. 103–120). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Cunningham-Andersson, U. (1990). Native speaker reactions to nonnative speech. In Leather, J. & James, A. (Eds.), New Sounds 90: Proceedings of the Amsterdam Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech (pp. 1–13). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
De Bot, C. L. J. (1979). Relative reliability in judging intonation. Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetics (Catholic University of Nijmegen), 4, 1–15.Google Scholar
De Bot, C. L. J. (1981). Visual feedback of intonation: An experimental approach. In Sigurd, G. & Svartvik, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth AILA Congress (Vol. 1, pp. 243–245). Lund, Sweden: University of Lund.Google Scholar
Dickerson, L. (1975). The learner's interlanguage as a system of variable rules. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 401–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickerson, L., & Dickerson, W. (1977). Interlanguage phonology: Current research and future directions. In Corder, S. P. & Roulet, E. (Eds.), Actes du 5ème colloque de linguistique appliquée de Neuchâtel (pp. 18–29). Neuchâtel: Université de Neuchâtel.Google Scholar
Dickerson, W. (1976). The psycholinguists unity of language learning and language change. Language Learning, 26, 215–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickerson, W. (1987). Explicit rules and the developing interlanguage phonology. In James, A. & Leather, J. (Eds.), Sound patterns in second language acquisition (pp. 121–140). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Dowd, J., Zuengler, J., & Berkowitz, D. (1990). L2 social marking: Research issues. Applied Linguistics, 11, 16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreher, B., & Larkins, J. (1972). Non-semantic auditory discrimination: Foundation for second language learning. Modern Language Journal, 56, 227–230.Google Scholar
Dresher, B., & Kaye, J. (1990). A computational learning model for metrical phonology. Cognition, 34, 137–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dressler, W. U. (1984). Explaining natural phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 1, 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durand, J. (1989). Generative and non-linear phonology. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Dziubalska-Kolaczyk, K. (1987). Phonological rule typology and second language acquisition. In James, A. & Leather, J. (Eds.), Sound patterns in second language acquisition (pp. 193–206). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Dziubalska-Kolaczyk, K. (1990). Phonological processes vs. morphonological rules in L2 acquisition. In Leather, J. & James, A. (Eds.), New Sounds 90: Proceedings of the Amsterdam Symposium on the Acquisition of Second-Language Speech (pp. 98–106). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Eckman, F. R. (1977). Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning, 27, 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckman, F. R. (1981). On predicting phonological difficulty in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 4, 18–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckman, F. R. (1987). The reduction of word-final consonant clusters in interlanguage. In James, A. & Leather, J. (Eds.), Sound patterns in second language acquisition (pp. 143–162). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Edman, T. R., Soli, S. D., & Widin, G. P. (1978). Learning and generalization of intraphonemic VOT discrimination. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63, Supplement 1, S19 (abstract).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efstathiadis, S. (1974). Creek and English phonology: A comparative investigation. Thessaloniki, Greece: Aristotelian University.Google Scholar
Eliasson, S. (1976). Theoretical problems in Scandinavian contrastive phonology. Reports from Uppsala University Department of Linguistics (RUUL), 5, 1–46.Google Scholar
Eliasson, S. (1984). Toward a theory of contrastive phonology. In Eliasson, S. (Ed.), Theoretical issues in contrastive phonology (pp. 7–26). Heidelberg: Groos.Google Scholar
Elman, J., Diehl, R., & Buchwald, S. (1977). Perceptual switching in bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62, 971–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdmann, P. (1973). Patterns of stress-transfer in English and German. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 11, 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esser, J. (1978). Contrastive intonation of German and English: Problems and some results. Phonetica, 35, 41–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fathman, A. (1975). The relationship between age and second language productive ability. Language Learning, 25, 245–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fentress, J. C. (1984). The development of coordination. Journal of Motor Behavior, 116, 99–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, C. (1984). Repertoire universals, markedness, and second language acquisition. In Rutherford, W. (Ed.), Language universals and second language acquisition (pp. 247–258). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisiak, J. (1975). The contrastive analysis of phonological systems. Kwartalnik Neofilologiczny, 22, 341–351.Google Scholar
Fisiak, J. (1976). Generative phonology and contrastive studies. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 21, 171–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1985). The production and perception of foreign language speech sounds. Biocommunication Research Reports (Birmingham, Alabama: University of Alabama at Birmingham), 4. (Also published [1988] in Winitz, H. (Ed.), Human communication and its disorders, pp. 224–401, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.)Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1987a). Effects of equivalence classification on the production of foreign language speech sounds. In James, A. & Leather, J. (Eds.), Sound patterns in second language acquisition (pp. 9–39).Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1987b). The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1988). The production and perception of foreign language speech sounds. In Winitz, H. (Ed.), Human communication and its disorders (pp. 224–401). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1990a). Contribution to the research workshop on modelling the acq uisition of second-language speech. In Leather, J. & James, A. (Eds.), New Sounds 90: Proceedings of the Amsterdam Symposium on the Acquisition of Second-Language Speech (pp. 338–348). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1990b). English vowel production by Dutch talkers: More evidence for the “similar” vs. “new” distinction. In Leather, J. & James, A. (Eds.), New Sounds 90: Proceedings of the Amsterdam Symposium on the Acquisition of Second-Language Speech (pp. 255–293). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (forthcoming). The intelligibility of English vowels spoken by British and Dutch talkers. In Kent, R. (Ed.), Intelligibility in speech disorders: Theory, measurement and management. Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Davidian, R. (1985). Transfer and speech production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 5, 323–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Eefting, W. (1987). The production and perception of English stops by Spanish speakers of English. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Fletcher, K. (forthcoming). At what age does a foreign accent first become evident? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Hammond, R. M. (1982). Mimicry of non-distinctive phonetic difference between language varieties. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E, & Hillenbrand, J. (1984). Limits on pronunciation accuracy in adult foreign language speech production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 708–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E, & Port, R. (1981). Cross-language phonetic interference from Arabic to English. Language and Speech, 24, 125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandour, J. (1983). Tone perception in Far Eastern languages. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 149–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gary, J. O. (1975). Delayed oral practice in initial stages of second language learning. In Burt, M. K. & Dulay, H. C. (Eds.), New directions in second language teaching and bilingual education (pp. 72–89). Washington, DC: TESOL.Google Scholar
Gass, S. (1984). Development of speech perception and speech production abilities in adult second language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 5, 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatbonton, E. (1978). Patterned phonetic variability in second-language speech: A gradual diffusion model. Canadian Modern Language Review, 34, 335–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, H. (1978). Linguistic differentiation in ethnic groups. In Tajfel, H. (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups (pp. 50–73). London: Academic.Google Scholar
Giles, H., & Byrne, J. L. (1982). An intergroup approach to second language acquisition. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 3, 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, J. A. (1990). Autosegmental and metrical phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goto, H. (1971). Auditory perception by normal Japanese subjects of the sounds “L” and “R.” Neuropsychologia, 9, 317–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greasley, V. M. (1971). An experiment to investigate two methods of teaching French pronunciation to native American speakers of English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
Greenberg, C. (1983). Syllable structure in second language acquisition. CUNY Forum (City University of New York), 9, 47–64.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. (1978). Some generalizations concerning initial and final consonant clusters. In Greenberg, J., Ferguson, C. A., & Moravcsik, E. A. (Eds.), Universals of human language: Volume 2: Phonology (pp. 243–279). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Grosser, W. (1989). Akzentuierung und Intonation im englischen Erwerb österreichischer Lerner. Salzburger Studien zur Anghstik und Amerikanistik 9. Universität Salzburg.Google Scholar
Guiora, A. Z, Acton, W. R., Erard, R., & Strickland, F. W. (1980). The effects of benzodiazepine (Valium) on permeability of language ego boundaries. Language Learning, 30, 351–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiora, A. Z., Brannon, R. C. L, & Dull, C. Y. (1972). Empathy and second language learning. Language Learning, 2, 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiora, A. Z., Paluszny, M., Beit-Hallahmi, B., Catford, J. C., Cooley, R. E., & Yoder-Dull, C. (1975). Language and person: Studies in language behavior. Language Learning, 25, 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiora, A. Z., & Schonberger, R. (1990). Native pronunciation of bilinguals. In Leather, J. & James, A. (Eds.), New Sounds 90: Proceedings of the Amsterdam Symposium on the Acquisition of Second-Language Speech (pp. 26–36). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. (1979, 08). Pronunciation preference among Dutch students. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on the Teaching of Spoken English, University of Leeds.Google Scholar
Hammarberg, B. (1988). Studien zur Phonologie des Zweitspracherwerbs. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
Hammarberg, B. (1990). Conditions on transfer in phonology. In Leather, J. & James, A. (Eds.), New Sounds 90: Proceedings of the Amsterdam Symposium on the Acquisition of Second-Language Speech (pp. 198–215). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Hammarberg, B. (forthcoming). Predicting structural difficulty in second language phonology: An old problem revisited. In A. James (Ed.), Issues in phonological acquisition.Google Scholar
Haugen, E. (1956). Bitingualism in the Americas: A bibliography and research guide. Baltimore: American Dialect Society.Google Scholar
Hecht, B., & Mulford, R. (1982). The acquisition of a second-language phonology: Interaction of transfer and developmental factors. Applied Psycholinguistics, 3, 313–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmke, B., & Wu, Y. S. (1980). Individual differences and foreign language pronunciation achievement. Revue de Phonétique Appliquée, 53, 25–34.Google Scholar
Henning, W. A. (1966). Discrimination training and self-evaluation in the teaching of pronunciation. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 4, 7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyde, A. W. (1979). The relationship between self-esteem and the oral production of a second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Hill, J. H. (1970). Foreign accents, language acquisition and cerebral dominance revisited. Language Learning, 20, 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodne, B. (1985). Yet another look at interlanguage phonology: The modification of English syllable structure by native speakers of Polish. Language Learning, 35, 405–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, R. (1980). Sociolinguistks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ioup, G., & Weinberger, S. (Eds.). (1987). Interlanguage phonology: The acquisition of a second language sound system. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Itoh, H. T., & Hatch, E. M. (1978). Second language acquisition: A case study. In Hatch, E. M. (Ed.), Second language acquisition: A book of readings (pp. 76–88). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
James, A. (1983). Transferability and dialect phonology: Swabian-English. In James, A. & Kettemann, B. (Eds.), Dialektphonologie und Fremdsprachenerwerb / Dialect phonology and foreign language acquisition (pp. 162–188). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
James, A. (1984). Phonic transfer: The structural bases of interlingual assessment. In van den Broecke, M. & Cohen, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 691–695). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
James, A. (1986a). Phonic transfer and phonological explanation: Some theoretical and methodological issues. In Kellerman, E. & Sharwood Smith, M. (Eds.), Crosslinguistic influence in second language acquisition (pp. 134–149). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
James, A. (1986b). Suprasegmental phonology and segmental form. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, A. (1988). The acquisition of a second language phonology. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
James, A. (1989). Linguistic theory and second language phonological learning: A perspective and some proposals. Applied Linguistics, 10, 367–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, A. (1990). A parameter-setting model for second language phonological acquisition? In Leather, J. & James, A. (Eds.), New Sounds 90: Proceedings of the Amsterdam Symposium on the Acquisition of Second-Language Speech (pp. 180–188). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
James, A., & Leather, J. (1987). Sound patterns in second language acquisition. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Johansson, F. (1973). Immigrant Swedish phonology. Lund, Sweden: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Johansson, S. (1980). Another look at foreign accent and speech distortion. Revue de Phonétique Appliquée, 53, 35–48.Google Scholar
Kahn, D. (1976). Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Kaye, J. (1981). Opacity and recoverability in phonology. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 19, 134–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, P. (1984). Phonetic and phonological representation of stop consonant voicing. Language, 60, 286–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, P. (1989). The phonetics-phonology interface. In Newmeyer, F. (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey (Vol. 1, pp. 281–302). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kent, R. D. (1976). Models of speech production. In Lass, N. J. (Ed.), Contemporary issues in experimental phonetics (pp. 79–104). New York: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klatt, D. (1979). Speech perception: Model of acoustic-phonetic variability and lexical access. Journal of Phonetics, 7, 279–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, K. (1971). On the adequacy of phonological theories for contrastive studies. In Nickel, G. (Ed.), Papers in contrastive linguistics (pp. 83–88). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kohler, K. (1981). Contrastive phonology and the acquisition of phonetic skills. Phonetica, 38, 213–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1973). On the mechanism of linguistic change. In Labov, W. (Ed.), Sociolinguistic patterns (pp. 160–182). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P., DeClerk, J., Lindau, M., & Papçun, G. (1972). An auditory-motor theory of speech production. Working Papers in Phonetics (University of California, Los Angeles), 22, 48–75.Google Scholar
Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lane, H. L., & Schneider, B. (1963). Methods for self-shaping echoic behavior. Modern Language Journal, 47, 154–160.Google Scholar
Leather, J. (1983). Second language pronunciation learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 16, 198–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leather, J. (1986). An interactive speech training system for Chinese tone. In Speech input/output: Techniques and applications. IEE Conference Publication No. 258, 248–251.Google Scholar
Leather, J. (1987). FO Pattern inference in the perceptual acquisition of second-language tone. In James, A. & Leather, J. (Eds.), Sound patterns in second language acquisition (pp. 59–80). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Leather, J. (1988). Speech pattern elements in second language acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University College, London.Google Scholar
Leather, J. (1990). Perceptual and productive learning of Chinese lexical tone by Dutch and English speakers. In Leather, J. & James, A. (Eds.), New Sounds 90: Proceedings of the Amsterdam Symposium on the Acquisition of Second-Language Speech (pp. 72–89). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Leather, J., & James, A. (1987). Sound patterns in second language acquisition. In James, A. & Leather, J. (Eds.), Sound patterns in second language acquisition (pp. 1–6). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, B. E. F., Lubker, J., & Gay, T. (1979). Formant frequencies of some fixed-mandible vowels and a model of speech motor programming by predicative simulation. Journal of Phonetics, 7, 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linell, P. (1979). Psychological reality in phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Linell, P. (1982). The concept of phonological form and the activities of speech production and perception. Journal of Phonetics, 10, 37–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisker, , & Abramson, A. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20, 384–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisker, L, & Abramson, A. (1970). The voicing dimension. In Hála, B., Romportal, M., & Janota, P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 563–567). Prague: Academia.Google Scholar
Locke, J. L. (1968). Oral perception and articulation learning. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 26, 1259–1264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Locke, J. L. (1969). Short-term auditory memory, oral perception and experimental sound learning. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 12, 185–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacCartny, P. (1976). Auditory and articulatory training for the language teacher and learner. English Language Teaching, 39, 212–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCarthy, P. (1978). The teaching of pronunciation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacKain, K. S., Best, C. T., & Strange, W. (1981). Categorical perception of /r/ and /I/ by Japanese bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 2, 369–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKay, D. G. (1970). How does language familiarity influence stuttering under delayed auditory feedback? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 30, 655–669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maidment, J. (1976). Voice fundamental frequency characteristics as language differentiators. Speech and Hearing: Work in Progress (University College, London), 75–93.Google Scholar
Maidment, J. (1983). Language recognition and prosody: Further evidence. Speech and Hearing: Work in Progress (University College, London), 133–141.Google Scholar
Major, R. (1986a). Paragoge and degree of foreign accent in Brazilian English. Second Language Research, 2, 53–69.Google Scholar
Major, R. (1986b). The Ontogeny Model: Evidence from L2 acquisition of Spanish. Language Learning, 36, 453–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Major, R. (1987a). A model for interlanguage phonology. In loup, G. & Weinberger, S. (Eds.), Interlanguage phonology (pp. 101–124). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Major, R. (1987b). Phonological similarity, markedness, and rate of L2 acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Major, R. (1987c). The natural phonology of second language acquisition. In James, A. & Leather, J. (Eds.), Sound patterns in second language acquisition (pp. 207–224). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Major, R. (1990). L2 acquisition, L1 loss, and the critical period hypothesis. In Leather, J. & James, A. (Eds.), New Sounds 90: Proceedings of the Amsterdam Symposium on the Acquisition of Second-Language Speech. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Manning, W. H., & Hein, S. L. (1981). Auditory feedback during the acquisition of new sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 70, Supplement 1, S12 (abstract).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, E. T., & Aungst, L. F. (1967). Studies in oral sensorimotor function. In Bosma, J. F. (Ed.), Symposium on Oral Sensation and Perception (pp. 202–220). Springfield, IL: Thomas.Google Scholar
Michaels, D. (1974). Sound replacements and phonological systems. Linguistics, 176, 69–81.Google Scholar
Miyawaki, K., Strange, W., Verbrugge, R., Liberman, A., Jenkins, J. J., & Fujimura, O. (1975). An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of [r] and [I] by native speakers of Japanese and English. Perception and Psychophysics, 18, 331–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mochizuki, M. (1982). The identification of /r/ and /I/ in natural and synthesized speech. Journal of Phonetics, 9, 283–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohanan, K. (1982). Lexical phonology. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Moulton, W. (1972). The sounds of English and German. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mueller, T. H., & Niedzielski, H. (1968). The influence of discrimination training on pronunciation. Modern Language Journal, 52, 410–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulford, R., & Hecht, B. (1980). Learning to speak without an accent: Acquisition of a second-language phonology. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development (Stanford, CA), 18, 61–74.Google Scholar
Nathan, G. (1987). On second-language acquisition of voiced stops. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 313–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathan, G. (1990). On the non-acquisition of an English sound pattern. In Leather, J. & James, A. (Eds.), New Sounds 90: Proceedings of the Amsterdam Symposium on the Acquisition of Second-Language Speech (pp. 294–299). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Nemser, W. (1971). An experimental study of phonological interference in the English of Hungarians. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Neufeld, G. G. (1977). Language learning ability in adults: A study of the acquisition of prosodic and articulatory features. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 12, 45–60.Google Scholar
Neufeld, G. G. (1978). On the acquisition of prosodic and articulatory features in adult language learning. Canadian Modern Language Review, 34, 168–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neufeld, G. G. (1980). On the adult's ability to acquire phonology. TESOL Quarterly, 14, 285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nooteboom, S. G. (1970). The target theory of speech production. IPO Annual Progress Report, 5, 51–55.Google Scholar
Obler, L. (1982). The parsimonious bilingual. In Obler, L. & Menn, L. (Eds.), Exceptional language and linguistics (pp. 339–346). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Oden, G. C., & Massaro, D. W. (1978). Integration of featural information in speech perception. Psychological Review, 85, 172–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohala, J. (1986). Consumer's guide to evidence in phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, J., & Jaeger, J. (Eds.). (1986). Experimental phonology. Orlando, FL: Academic.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. J., & Gilbert, J. B. (1978). Listeners' ability to identify languages by their prosody. Report of the Phonology Laboratory (University of California, Berkeley), 2, 126–132.Google Scholar
Oller, D. K., & Eilers, R. E. (1983). Speech identification in Spanish- and English-learning 2-year-olds. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 26, 50–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, L. L., & Samuels, S. J. (1973). The relationship between age and accuracy of pronunciation. Journal of Educational Research, 66, 263–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyama, S. (1976). A sensitive period for the acquisition of a non-native phonological system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5, 261–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimsleur, P. (1963). Discrimination training in the teaching of French pronunciation. Modern Language Journal, 47, 190–203.Google Scholar
Pisoni, D. B., Aslin, R. N., Perey, A. J., & Hennessy, B. L. (1982). Some effects of laboratory training on identification and discrimination of voicing contrasts in top consonants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 297–314.Google Scholar
Polivanov, E. (1974). The subjective nature of the perception of language sounds. In Leontev, A. (Ed.), E. D. Polivanov: Selected writings (Armstrong, D., Trans., pp. 223–237). The Hague: Mouton. (Original work published 1932)Google Scholar
Postovsky, V. A. (1974). Effects of delay in oral practice at the beginning of second language learning. Modern Language Journal, 58, 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puppel, S. (1990). Some preliminary observations of Polish and English vowel spaces in contact. In Fisiak, J. (Ed.), Further insights into contrastive linguistics (pp. 241–253). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Purcell, E. T, & Suter, R. W. (1980). Predictors of pronunciation accuracy: A re-examination. Language Learning, 39, 271–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pürschel, H. (1975). Pauze und Kadenz: Interferenzerscheinungen bei der englischen Intonation deutscher Sprecher. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redmond, L. (1977). Learning to recognize foreign speech sounds: Strategies of auditory processing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Repp, B. (1977). Dichotic competition of speech sounds: The role of acoustic stimulus structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 37–50.Google Scholar
Repp, B. (1984). Categorical perception: Issues, methods, findings. In Lass, N. J. (Ed.), Speech and language: Advances in basic research and practice (Vol. 10, pp. 25–39). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Ritchie, W. (1968). On the explanation of phonic interference. Language Learning, 18, 183–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubach, J. (1984). Rule typology and phonological interference. In Eliasson, S. (Ed.), Theoretical issues in contrastive phonology (pp. 37–50). Heidelberg: Groos.Google Scholar
Sato, C. (1984). Phonological processes in second language acquisition: Another look at interlanguage syllable structure. Language Learning, 34, 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato, C. (1985). Task variation in interlanguage phonology. In Gass, S. & Madden, C. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 181–196). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Scherer, K. R. (1979). Lernpsychologische Überlegungen zur Korrekturphonetik im Fremdsprachenanfangsunterricht. Der fremdsprachliche Unterricht, 41, 20–47.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1977). Sociolinguistic variation and language transfer in phonology. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 12, 79–95.Google Scholar
Schneiderman, E. I., & Wesche, M. B. (1983). The role of the right hemisphere in second language acquisition. In Bailey, K. M., Long, M. H., & Peck, S. (Eds.), Second language acquisition studies (pp. 162–174). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Scholes, R. J. (1967). Phoneme categorization of synthetic vocalic stimuli by speakers of Japanese, Spanish, Persian and American English. Language and Speech, 10, 46–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scholes, R. J. (1968). Phonemic interference as a perceptual phenomenon. Language and Speech, 11, 86–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schouten, M. E. H. (1975). Native language interference in the perception of second language vowels. Doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Schouten, M. E. H., van Dalen, T. E., & Klein, A. J. J. (1985). Ear advantage and second language proficiency. Journal of Phonetics, 13, 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumann, H. H, Holroyd, J., Campbell, R. N., & Ward, F. A. (1978). Improvement of foreign language pronunciation under hypnosis: A preliminary study. Language Learning, 28, 143–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumann, J. (1975). Affective factors and the problem of age in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 25, 209–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumann, J. (1978). The acculturation model for L2 acquisition. In Gringas, R. C. (Ed.), Second language acquisition and foreign language teaching (pp. 27–50). Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Scovel, T. (1969). Foreign accents, language acquisition and cerebral dominance. Language Learning, 19, 245–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scuffil, M. (1982). Experiments in comparative intonation: A case study of English and German. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seliger, H. W., Krashen, S., & Ladefoged, P. (1975). Maturational constraints in the acquisition of second language accent. Language Sciences, 36, 20–22.Google Scholar
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, E. (1984). On the major class features and syllable theory. In Aronoff, M. & Oehrle, R. (Eds.), Language sound structure (pp. 107–136). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sheldon, A., & Strange, W. (1982). The acquisition of /r/ and /I/ by Japanese learners of Englsih: Evidence that speech production can precede speech perception. Applied Psycholinguistics, 3, 243–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, G., Fehst, C, Garber, S., & Pick, H. (1980). Delayed auditory feedback with children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 23, 803–813.Google ScholarPubMed
Simon, C., & Fourcin, A. J. (1976, May). Differences between individual listeners in their comprehension of speech and perception of sound patterns. Speech and Hearing (Department of Phonetics and Linguistics, University College, London), 94–125.Google Scholar
Singh, R. (1985). Prosodic adaptation in interphonology. Lingua, 67, 269–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, R. (1991). Interference and contemporary phonological theory. Language Learning, 41, 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, R., & Ford, A. (1987). Interphonology and phonological theory. In James, A. & Leather, J. (Eds.), Sound patterns in second language acquistion (pp. 163–172). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E., & Hoemagel-Höhle, M. (1977). Age differences in the pronunciation of foreign sounds. Language and Speech, 20, 357–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spolsky, B. (1969). Attitudinal aspects of second language learning. Language Learning, 20, 271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stampe, D. (1973). A dissertation on natural phonology. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Stevens, K. N. (1977). [Discussion contribution]. In Sawashima, M. & Cooper, F. S. (Eds.), Dynamic aspects of speech production (pp. 343–344). Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, K. N., & Perkell, J. S. (1977). Speech physiology and phonetic features. In Sawashima, M. & Cooper, F. S. (Eds.), Dynamic aspects of speech production (pp. 323–341). Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Stockwell, R., & Bowen, J. (1965). The sounds of English and Spanish. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Strain, J. E. (1963). Difficulties in measuring pronunication improvement. Language Learning, 13, 217–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strange, W., & Jenkins, J. J. (1978). Role of linguistic experience in the perception of speech. In Walk, R. D. & Pick, H. L. (Eds.), Perception and experience (pp. 125–169). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeter, L. A., & Landauer, T. K. (1975, 08). The effects of learning English as a second language on the acquisition of anew phonemic contrast. Paper presented to the Acoustical Society of America, Austin, Texas.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strevens, P. (1974). A rationale for teaching pronunciation: The rival virtues of innocence and sophistication. English Language Teaching Journal, 28, 182–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Studdert-Kennedy, M., & Hadding, K. (1973). Auditory and linguistic processes in the perception of intonation contours. Language and Speech, 16, 293–313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suter, R. W. (1976). Predictions of pronunciation accuracy in second language learning. Language Learning, 26, 233–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tahta, S., Wood, M., & Loewenthal, K. (1981a). Age changes in the ability to replicate foreign pronunciation and intonation. Language and Speech, 24, 363–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tahta, S., Wood, M., & Loewenthal, K. (1981b). Foreign accents: Factors relating to transfer of accent from the first language to a second language. Language and Speech, 24, 265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarone, E. (1972). A suggested unit for interlingual identification in pronunciation. TESOL Quarterly, 6, 325–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarone, E. (1976). Some influences on interlanguage phonology. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 8, 87–111.Google Scholar
Tarone, E. (1978). The phonology of interlanguage. In Richards, J. (Ed.), Understanding second and foreign language learning (pp. 15–33). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Tarone, E. (1980). Some influences on the syllable structure of interlanguage phonology. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 4, 143–163.Google Scholar
Tarone, E. (1982). Systematicity and attention in interlanguage. Language Learning, 32, 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarone, E. (1983). On the variability of interlanguage systems. Applied Linguistics, 4, 142–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L. L, Catford, J. C, Guiora, A. Z, & Lane, H. L. (1971). Psychological variables and the ability to pronounce a second language. Language and Speech, 14, 146–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trehub, S. E. (1976). The discrimination of foreign speech contrasts by children and adults. Child Development, 47, 466–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trocmé, H. (1978). L'éducation de la perception sensorimotrice: Un prérequis de l'apprentissage de la langue. IUT Bulletin Pedagogique (Nancy, France), 53, 11–22.Google Scholar
Tropf, H. (1983). Variation in der Phonologie des ungesteurerten Zweitspracherwerbs: Bd. 1, Bd. 2. Doctoral dissertation, Universität Heidelberg, Germany.Google Scholar
Tropf, H. (1987). Sonority as a variability factor in second language phonololgy. In James, A. & Leather, J. (Eds.), Sound patterns in second language acquisition (pp. 173–191). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. (1958). Grundzüge der Phonologie (Travaux du cercle linguistique de Prague 7). Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht. (Original work published 1939)Google Scholar
Valdman, A. (1976). Introduction to French phonology and morphology. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Vance, T. J. (1977). Tonal distinctions in Cantonese. Phonetica, 34, 93–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walz, J. (1975). A longitudinal study of the acquisition of French pronunciation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Wardhaugh, R. (1970). The contrastive analysis hypothesis. TESOL Quarterly, 4, 123–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberger, S. (1987). The influence of linguistic context on syllable simplification. In Ioup, G. & Weinberger, S. (Eds.), Interlanguage phonology (pp. 401–417). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Weinberger, S. (1990). Minimal segments in L2 phonology. In Leather, J. & James, A. (Eds.), New Sounds 90: Proceedings of the Amsterdam Symposium on the Acquisition of Second-Language Speech (pp. 137–179). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U. (1953). Languages in contact. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U. (1957). On the description of phonic interference. Word, 13, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, L. (1970). Auditory discrimination and pronunciation of Frenchvowel phonemes. Dissertation Abstracts International, 31, 4051–A.Google Scholar
Weiss, R. (1976). The role of perception in teaching the German vowels to American students. In Nickel, G. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Applied Linguistics (Vol. 3, pp. 513–524). Stuttgart: Hochschulverlag.Google Scholar
Wenk, B. (1979). Articulatory setting and de-fossilization. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 4, 202–220.Google Scholar
Wenk, B. (1982). Articulatory setting and the acquisition of second language phonology. Revue de Phonétique Appliquée, 65, 51–65.Google Scholar
Wenk, B. (1986). Crosslinguistic influence in second language phonology: Speech rhythms. In Kellerman, E. & Sharwood, M. Smith (Eds.), Crosslinguistic influence in second language acquisition (pp. 120–133). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Werker, J. F, Gilbert, J. H. V., Humphrey, K., & Tees, R. C. (1981). Developmental aspects of cross-language speech perception. Child Development, 52, 349–355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werker, J. F, & Tees, R. C. (1983). Developmental changes across childhood in the perception of non-native speech sounds. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 37, 278–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984a). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual organization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984b). Phonemic and phonetic factors in adult cross-language speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75, 1866–1878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitman, R. (1970). Contrastive analysis: Problems and procedures. Language Learning, 20, 191–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieden, W. (1990). Some remarks on developing phonological representations. In Leather, J. & James, A. (Eds.), New Sounds 90: Proceedings of the Amsterdam Symposium on the Acquisition of Second-Language Speech (pp. 189–197). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Wieden, W., & Nemser, W. (forthcoming). Universal, maturational and transfer factors in the acquisition of L2 phonology. In James, A. (Ed.), Issues in phonological acquisition.Google Scholar
Williams, L. (1977). The perception of stop consonant voicing by Spanish-English bilinguals. Perception and Psychophysics, 21, 289–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, L. (1979). The modification of speech perception and production in second language learning. Perception and Psychophysics, 26, 95–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wode, H. (1977). The L2 acquisition of /r/. Phonetica, 34, 200–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wode, H. (1978). The beginnings of non-school-room L2 phonological acquisition. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 16, 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wode, H. (1980). Phonology in L2 acquisition. In Felix, S. (Ed.), Second language development (pp. 123–136). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Wode, H. (1981). Learning a second language. Tūbingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, G. N., Price, P. J., & Ayusawa, T. (1984). The production of /r/ and /I/ by Japanese speakers differing in experience with English. Journal of Phonetics, 12, 187–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuengler, J. (1988). Identity markers and L2 pronunciation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10, 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar