Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T21:18:51.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The recusant view of the English past

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2016

W. B. Patterson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The English roman catholic, or recusant, community of the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries has proved to be of considerable interest to historians in recent years for political, economic, and social reasons. But the community was intellectually important, too, having produced theological and devotional works which had a considerable impact upon the reading public, protestant as well as roman catholic, in England and on the continent. The recusants, however, were not content to argue their case on the basis of theology and the scriptures, but turned, as cardinal Baronius and cardinal Bellarmine were doing during these years, to the evidence of history. It was by no means the least of their achievements - though it is one which has been little noted - that they developed a distinctive view of their nation’s past and helped to launch an intensive investigation of some of the most important problems in English ecclesiastical history.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Church History , Volume 11: The Materials Sources and Methods of Ecclesiastical History , 1975 , pp. 249 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bossy, John, ‘The Character of Elizabethan Catholicism’, PP, 21 (1962) pp 39–59 Google Scholar; Stone, Lawrence, The Crisis of the Aistocracy, 1558-1641 (Oxford 1965) pp 725-45Google Scholar; McGrath, Patrick, Papists and Puritans under Elizabeth I (London 1967) pp 57–72 Google Scholar, 100-24, 161-204, 253-99.

2 Some of their more significant contributions are noted in Southern, A.C., Elizabethan Recusant Prose, 1550-1582 (London 1950)Google Scholar. For a detailed list of their English writings, see [A Catalogue of Catholic Books in English, Printed Abroad or Secretly in England, 1558-1640, ed Allison, A.F. and Rogers, [D.M.] (Bognor Regis 1956)Google Scholar.

3 The fullest treatment of their importance in the historical area - treating mainly their views on antiquity - is in Polman, [Pontien], L’élément historique [dans la controverse religieuse du XVIe siècle], Catholic University of Louvain, Dissertations in Theology, ser 2, vol 23 (Gembloux 1932) passim Google Scholar. See also Tavard, George H., Holy Writ or Holy Church: The Crisis of the Protestant Reformation (London 1959) pp 131-6, 210-44Google Scholar.

4 See Prévost, [André], Thomas More, [1477-1535, et la crise de la pensée européenne] (Paris 1969) pp 131-41, 363-7Google Scholar. More’s advice was contained in a letter to his friend Martin van Dorp, in the Netherlands, in 1515.

5 Prévost, Thomas More pp 167-96, 233-87. See, for example, The English Works of Sir Thomas More, ed Campbell, W.E. and Reed, A.W., II: The Dialogue concerning Tyndale> (London 1931) pp 63-128Google Scholar.

6 Polman, L’élément historique pp 293, 352. Henry VIII’s, Asserito septem sacra-mentorum adversus Martin. Lutherum (London 1521)Google Scholar is dated 12 July 1521.

7 For Fisher’s defence of the king against Luther’s attack, which had appeared in Wittenberg in 1522, see Surtz, Edward, The Works and Days of John Fisher (Cambridge, Mass. 1967) pp 11–13, 320-36CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 For Pole’s life and the circumstances of his departure from England, see Wilhelm Schenk, , Reginald Pole: Cardinal of England (London 1950) pp 1–30 Google Scholar, and Fenlon, Dermot B., Heresy and Obedience in Tridentine Italy: Cardinal Pole and the Counter Reformation (Cambridge 1972) pp 24–44 Google Scholar.

9 Pole’s treatise was sent to the king in May 1536; the first printed edition was issued in Rome in 1539. Other editions were published in Strasburg in 1555 and in Ingolstadt in 1587. For a modern edition with critical apparatus, see Pole, [Reginald], Défense de l’unité de l’église, [en quatre livres], ed Egretier, Nbelle-Marie (Paris 1967)Google Scholar.

10 [Reginald] Pole, , Pro ecclesiasticae vnitatis defensione, [libri quatuor, in quibus conatus est maximo studio Ecclesiae Romanae Primatum constabilire] (Strasburg 1555 Google Scholar) fol 1; Défense de l’unité de l’église p 51.

11 Pole, Pro ecclesiasticae vnitatis defensione fols 1-51; Défense de l’unité de l’église pp 51-205.

12 Pole,Pro ecclesiasticae vnitatis defensione fols 53v-54v; Défense de l’unité de l’église pp 212-16.

13 Pole, Pro ecclesiasticae vnitatis defensione fols 56-8; Défense de l’unité de l’église pp 220-5.

14 Pole, Pro ecclesiasticae vnitatis defensione fols 58-60, 84-96; Défense de l’unité de l’église pp 225-31, 305-42.

15 The importance of Pole’s treatise for the development of the roman catholic view of the English reformation is discussed in Wormald, B.H.G., ‘The Historiography of the English Reformation’, Historical Studies, 2, ed Williams, T. Desmond (London 1958) pp 50-8Google Scholar.

16 For Sanders’s career and his work as a theologian and historian, see Veech, Thomas McNevin, Dr Nicholas Sanders and the English Reformation, 1130-1581, University of Louvain, Publications in History and Philology, ser 2, fasc 32 (Louvain 1935)Google Scholar, and Sanders, [Nicolas], Rise and Growth of the Anglican Schism, ed and trans Lewis, David (London 1877) pp xiii–xxix Google Scholar. For an account of the movement of English Catholics abroad, see Guilday, peter, The English Catholic Refugees on the Continent, 1558-1791 (London 1914)Google Scholar.

17 Sanders, [Nicolas], De origine ac progressu schismatis anglicani (Cologne 1585)Google Scholar Sig. a iiij-a v verso; Rise and Growth of the Anglican Schism pp cxlv-cxlvii.

18 Sanders, De origine ac progressu schismatis anglicani pp 14-16; Rise and Growth of the Anglican Schism pp 22-5.

19 Sanders, De origine ac progressu schismatis anglicani pp 77-81; Rise and Growth of the Anglican Schism pp 120-6.

20 Sanders, De origine ac progressu schismatis anglicani pp 106-42; Rise and Growth of the Anglican Schism pp 167-233.

21 Sanders, De origine ac progressu schismatis anglicani p 158; Rise and Growth of the Anglican Schism p 261.

22 Roper, William, The Mirror of Vertve in Worldly Greatnes: Or, The Life of Syr Thomas More Knight, Sometimes Lo. Chancellour of England (Paris [St. Omer] 1626) prefaceGoogle Scholar.

23 See Stapleton, Thomas, The Life and Illustrious Martyrdom of Sir Thomas More, Formerly Lord Chancellor of England, trans Hallet, Philip E. (London 1928) pp x, xv-xviGoogle Scholar. On Stapleton’s distinguished academic and literary career, see O’Connell, Marvin R., Thomas Stapleton and the Counter Reformation (New Haven, Conn. 1964) pp 26–51 Google Scholar and passim, and Richards, Michael, ‘Thomas Stapleton’, JEH 18 (1967) pp 187-99Google Scholar.

24 Harpsfield, Nicholas, The Life and Death of Sr Thomas Moore, ed Chambers, R.W., E[arly] Efnglish] T[ext] S[ociety] (London 1932)Google Scholar; Ro: Ba:, The Lyfe of Syr Thomas More, Sometymes Lord Chancellor of England, ed Elsie Vaughan Hitchcock and P. E. Hallett, EETS (1950); Cresacre More, The Life and Death of Sir Thomas Moore, Lord High Chancellour of England: Written by M. T .M. and Dedicated to the Queens Most Gracious Maiestie ([Antwerp, c 1630]). For the identification of the author and probable date of publication of the last work see Allison and Rogers. Also More, Cresacre, The Life of Sir Thomas More, ed Hunter, Joseph (London 1828) pp xvii-lxiGoogle Scholar.

25 Stapleton, Thomas, Tres Thomae: Sev, De S. Thomae Apostoli rebus gestis; De S. Thoma Archiepiscopo Cantuariensi & Martyre; D. Thomae Mori Angliae quondam Cancellarti Vita (Douai 1588)Google Scholar.

26 [The] History of the Chvrch of Englande, [Compiled by Venerable Bede, Englishman, trans Stapleton, Thomas] (Antwerp 1565)Google Scholar Sig. *2 verso-*3.

27 History of the Chvrch ofEnglande Sig. *3.

28 Ibid Sig. *3 verso.

29 The work has a separate title page: A Fortresse of the Faith, First Planted amonge Vs Englishmen, and Continued Hitherto in the Vniuersall Church of Christ, the Faith of Which Time Prostestants Call, Papistry (Antwerp 1565). The argument here is more theological than historical, and is based upon an understanding of the church as a divine institution, guided by the Holy Spirit, and visible to the world.

30 Parsons, [Robert], A Treatise of Three Conversions [of England from Paganisme to Christian Religion: The First under the Apostles, in the First Age after Christ; The Second vnder Pope Eleutherius and K. Lucius, in the Second Age; The Third, under Pope Gregory the Great, and K. Ethelbert in the Sixth Age] ([St. Omer] 1603) p 1 Google Scholar. For Parson’s career, see Parish, John E., Robert Parsons and the English Counter- Reformation, Rice University Studies, 52, I (Houston 1966)Google Scholar passim.

31 Parsons, A Treatise of Three Conversions pp 3, 76-9, 149-50.

32 Ibid pp 302, 436-7, 488-9, 507.

33 Ibid pp 574, 590. The section in which these sects are listed has a separate title page: The Third Part of a Treatise, Intituled: Of Three Conversions of England; Conteyninge, an Examen of the Calendar or Catalogue of Protestant Saints, Martyrs and Confessors, Devised by lohn Fox, and Prefixed before His Volume of Aits and Momunents([St Omer] 1604).

34 For Harpsfield’s career, see Chambers, R.W., ‘Life and Works of Nicholas Harpsfield’, in his edition of Harpsfield’s Life and Death of Sr Thomas Moore pp clxxv-ccxivGoogle Scholar. Harpsfield’s Treatise on the Pretended Divorce between Henry VIII and Catherine of Aragon, apparently written during Mary’s reign, was first published by the Camden Society, ed Nicholas Pocock, in 1878.

35 Harpsfield, [Nicholas], Dialogi sex, [contra svmmi pontificatvs, monasticae vitae, sanctorvm, sacrarvm imaginvm, oppugnatores, et psevdomartyres,] ed Cope, Alan (Antwerp 1566) pp 802-4Google Scholar, 904-9, 996 (quotation found on the last page).

36 Ibid p 985.

37 Harpsfield, [Nicholas], Historia anglicana ecclesiastica [a primis gentis svsceptae fidei incvnabvlis ad nostra fere tempora dedvcta, et in qvindecim centurias distributa] (Douai 1622)Google Scholar.

38 Ibid pp 661-732. This section is given a separate title: Historia Wicleffiana.

39 Ibid pp 741-79.

40 Levy, F.J., Tudor Historical Thought (San Marino, Calif. 1967) pp 79–166 Google Scholar; McKisack, May, Medieval History in the Tudor Age (Oxford 1971) pp 1–49 Google Scholar; Knox, R.Buick, James Ussher, Archbishop of Armagh (Cardiff 1967)Google Scholar passim.

41 A Collection of Curious Discourses Written by Eminent Antiquaries upon Several Heads in Our English Antiquities, ed Hearne, Thomas, 2 vols (London 1771) II, pp 155-72Google Scholar.

42 Mozley, J.J., John Foxe and His Book (London 1940) pp 118-74Google Scholar; Haller, William, Foxe’s Book of Martyrs and the Elect Nation (London 1963) pp 140–233 Google Scholar.

43 Coke, Edward, The Fift Part of the Reports of Sr Edward Coke, Knight, the Kings Attorney Generall: Of Diuers Resolutions and Iudgemcnts Giuen vpon Great Deliberation, in Matters of Great Importance & Consequence by the Reuerend Iudges and Sages of the Law; Together with the Reasons and Causes of Their Resolutions and Iudgements (London 1605)Google Scholar fol 8 and passim.

44 Mason, Francis, Of the Consecration of the Bishops in the Chvrch of England, with Their Succession, Jurisdiction, and Other Things Incident to Their Calling, as also of the Ordination of Priests and Deacons (London 1613)Google Scholar Sig. A3 verso. The sub-title of the work indicates that it is an answer to the ‘Slanders and Odious Imputations’ of Bellarmine, Sanders, Harding, Allen, Stapleton, and Parsons.

45 Mocket, Richard, Doctrina, et polititia Ecclesiae Anglicanae, a Beatissimae Memoriae Principibvs Edovardo Sexto, Regina Elizabetha stabilitae, et a Religiosissimo & Potentissimo Monarcha Iacobo, Magnae Britan. Ec. Rege continuatae (London 1617)Google Scholar. For the circumstances which caused James I to withdraw his support from the book, see Porter, Bertha, ‘Richard Mocket’, DNB 13, p 538 Google Scholar.

46 Fuller, [Thomas], The Church History of Britain, [from the Birth of Jesus Christ, untill the Year M.DC.XLVIII] (London 1655)Google Scholar; Heylyn, Peter, Ecclesia Restavrata: Or, The History of the Reformation of the Church of England (London 1661)Google Scholar; Stillingfleet, Edward, Origines Britannicae: Or, The Antiquities of the British Churches (London 1685)Google Scholar.

47 Burnet, Gilbert, The History of the Reformation of the Church of England, 3 vols (London 1679-1715)Google Scholar; Strype, John, Memorials of the Most Reverend Father in God, Thomas Cranmer, Sometime Lord Archbishop of Canterbury (London 1694)Google Scholar, Annals of the Reformation and Establishment of Religion, and Other Various Occurrences in the Church of England; During the First Twelve Years of Queen Elizabeth’s Happy Reign (London 1709), and other volumes; Collier, Jeremy, An Ecclesiastical History of Great Britain; Chiefly of England: From the First Planting of Christianity, to the End of the Reign of King Charles the Second, 2 vols (London 1708-14)Google Scholar.

48 Douglas, David C., English Scholars, 1660-1730 (2 ed London 1951) pp 195–221 Google Scholar.

49 Fuller, The Church History of Britain bk IX, p 143.