Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T15:58:45.003Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Gospel of Work and the Virgin Mary: Catholics, Protestants, and Work in the Nineteenth Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2016

Jane Garnett
Jane Garnett*
Affiliation:
Wadham College, Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When, in 1904–5, Max Weber published his famous essay on The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism’, he set out to explore the reasons for an affinity, the existence of which was a commonplace in large parts of Europe and North America. Whilst the literature on the strengths and weaknesses of Weber’s thesis is vast, much less attention has been paid to the contours of the mid to late nineteenth-century debate out of which his interest developed. Yet the neglect of that context has continued to foster over-simplified views of the world with which Weber’s argument originally engaged. His essay forms part of a much more extensive discourse on the role of religious belief in economic life. This paper discusses one particular nexus of that debate: the way in which British Protestants shaped their economic ethic by reference both to their ideas of Catholicism and to perceived oversimplifications of Protestant virtue; and the way in which Catholics in Italy responded to the promotion by secular liberals of what was seen by them as ‘puritan’ economics – that is, the maxims of British classical political economy. To compare the British and Italian contemporary literatures on this theme helps to draw out and to clarify some significant complexities in nineteenth-century thinking about the relationship between economics and morality. Underpinning each religious critique in Britain and in Italy was an emphasis on the necessary closeness of the relationship between attitudes to work and attitudes to the rest of life. In each case this implied an assertion at the philosophical level that economics had a metaphysical dimension which needed to be justified, and at a practical level that time spent both working and not working was devotional. Because each was engaging with a popularized model of political economy there were in fact methodological affinities between their respective positions in this context, little though each would often have liked to acknowledge it. These have been obscured by obvious distinctions of cultural and political development which have in turn produced different historiographical traditions. Moreover, the predominance, since the early twentieth century, of a supposedly ‘objective’ model of economics which tacitly denies its metaphysical dimension has meant that nineteenth-century Christian economic thought has been discussed rather as part of the multiple stories of denominational social action than as what it more crucially set out to be: that is, a radical intellectual challenge to the premises of mainstream economic assumptions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Church History , Volume 37: The Use and Abuse of Time in Christian History , 2002 , pp. 255 - 274
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 A recent and stimulating set of essays which addresses the contemporary (principally German) context as well as the reception of Weber’s work is H. Lehmann and G. Roth, eds, Weber’s Protestant Ethic (Cambridge, 1993).

2 Roussel, N., Catholic and Protestant Nations Compared in their Three-fold Relation to Wealth, Knowledge and Morality (London, 1855), pp. 138–9 Google Scholar, 146–7.

3 Cook, E. T. and A Wedderbum, eds, Works of John Ruskin, 39 vols (London, 1902-12), 28: 402–3 Google Scholar.

4 Froude, J. A., Calvinism: An Address delivered at St Andrew’s (London, 1871), pp. 23, 58 Google Scholar.

5 Early Closing Advocate and Commercial Reformer, no. 6 Qune 1854), p. 97. Cf. ibid., no. 3 (March 1854), p. 38; T. H. Tarlton, The right way of resting’, Excelsior, 2 (1854-5), pp. 273–4.

6 Carlyle, T., ‘Labour’, Past and Present (London, 1843), pp. 264–6 Google Scholar; idem, ‘Reward’, ibid., pp. 270–1; J. H. Hinton, introductory discourse to Baptist Manual (1857), p. 89.

7 Reeve, J. W., The activity of worldliness in the last days’, in Present Times and Future Prospects (London, 1854), p. 38 Google Scholar.

8 Pollock, A. M., The Object of Life (Dublin, London, and Edinburgh, 1859), pp. 16, 21 Google Scholar; T. Binney, ‘Salvation by fire’, Sermons Preached in King’s Weigh House Chapel 1820–69 (London, 1869), p. 153; London Quarterly Review, 6 (1856), pp. 167–77; Church of England Monthly Review, 1 (1856), pp. 100–3; H. R. Reynolds, ‘Rest in the Lord’, Noteson the Christian Life. A Selection of Sermons (London, 1865), esp. p. 137; A. Maclaren, ‘Anxious care’, Sermons Preached in Union Chapel (London, 1859), p. 276.

9 Baptist Magazine, 50 (1858), p. 406; ibid., 54 (1862), p. 547; R. W. Dale, ‘Amusements’, Weekday Sermons (London, 1867), p. 251; J. B. Brown, ‘Recreation’, The Home Life in the Light of the Divine Idea (London, 1866), p. 187. See also J. Garnett, ‘Nonconformists, economic ethics and the consumer society in mid-Victorian Britain’, in A. Kreider and J. Shaw, eds, Culture and the Nonconformist Tradition (Cardiff, 1999), pp. 99–107.

10 Pickard, J., The Sabbath, Its Origin, History and Obligations (London, 1856), pp. 38–44 Google Scholar; L. Wiseman, Things Secular and Things Sacred (London, 1856), p. 23.

11 E.g. Arthur, W., The Successful Merchant; Sketches of the Life of Mr. Samuel Budgett, late of Kingswood Hill (London, 1852 Google Scholar); B. Gregory, The Thorough Business Man: Memoirs of Walter Powell (London, 1871); P. Lorimer, Healthy Religion Exemplified in the Life of the late Mr. Andrew Jack, of Edinburgh (London, 1852); J. Stacey, A Prince in Israel: Sketches of the Life of John Ridgway (London, 1862).

12 Smiles, S., Self-Help; with Illustrations of Character and Conduct (London, 1859), p. 151 Google Scholar.

13 Ibid. (1866 edn), preface, pp. iii-iv.

14 Lozzi, C., Dell’ozio in Italia, 2 vols (Turin and Naples, 1870-1), 1: 379 Google Scholar.

15 Ibid., 1: 153.

16 Ibid., 1: 14–15.

17 C. Lozzi, Dell’ozio in Italia, i: 342–5, 167–76.

18 ‘If the deification of the state is an absurdity, the deification of the individual is the negation of God and of morality’: L. Carpi, L’ltalia vivente (Milan, 1878), p. 61. See also A. M. Band, Storia della borghesia italiana. L’eta liberate (Rome, 1996), pp. 227–8.

19 Carpi, L’ltalia vivente, pp. 290–6.

20 Ibid., pp. 305–7.

21 ‘Associazione pel ptogresso degli studi economici: verbale dell’Adunanza del Comitate di Padova, 13 febbraio 1875’, Giornale degli economisti, a. i, 1 (Padua, 1875), p. 28.

22 Ellera, P., La tirannide borghese, 2nd edn (Bologna, 1879), pp. 414–15 Google Scholar, 443–44.

23 Cantu, C., Portafoglio d’un operajo (Milan, 1871), pp. 254–8 Google Scholar. For discussion of Rossi’s view of the negative consequences of the pursuit of liberal economic theory in Britain, see G. Baglioni, L’ideologia delta borghesia industrial nell’Italia liberate (Turin, 1974), pp. 254–61.

24 ‘I di festivi’, La civilta cattolica, ser. 1, a.i, 1 (1850), pp. 385–403; ‘L’ordine nella beneficenza privata’, ibid., ser. 5, a.13, 4 (1862), p. 45.

25 de Sauvigny, G. de Bertier, La France et lesfrancais vus par les voyageurs americains 1814–1848, 2 vols (Paris, 1985), 2, p. 180 Google Scholar. The American visitor was John Sanderson, who travelled to Paris in 1835, and published his comments in his Sketches of Paris, in Familiar Letters to his Friends, by an American Gentleman, 2 vols (Philadelphia, PA, 1838).

26 Cf. ‘Delia economia sociale alia moderna’, La civilta cattolica, ser.i, a.3, 8 (1852), p. 256.

27 La settimana religiosa, a.2, no. 24 (16 June 1872), pp. 203–4; ibid., a.4, no. 26 (28 June 1874), pp. 222–3; ibid., a.5, no. 2 (10 Jan. 1875), pp. 14–15.

28 Annalicattolici, I.i, I (1863-4), p. 45; ‘L’Uomo macchina’, La civilta cattolica, ser.13, a.38, 8 (1887), pp. 135–6; ‘11 riposo festivo e la legislazione’, ibid., ser.17, a.48, 1 (1898), pp. 400–1.

29 xd’Amico, L. Papa, ‘Il riposo domenicale e le pubbliche manifestazioni a Milano e a Palermo’, Nuova antologia, ser. 2, 41 (1883), pp. 724–44 Google Scholar.

30 See Jannet, C., ‘French catholics and the social question’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 7 (1892), p. 141 Google Scholar for similar inhibitions in France; cf. R. Beck, Histoire du dimanche de 1700 a nos jours (Paris, 1997), pp. 260–1.

31 Papa d’Amico, ‘11 riposo domenicale’, p. 741.

32 Carpi, L’ltalia vivente, p. 399.

33 L’Eco d’ltalia, a.2, no. 173 (1884), p. 2; ibid., a.6, no. 125 (1888), p. 2.

34 La settimana religiosa, a.8, no. 14 (7 April 1878), pp. 150–1; L’Eco d’ltalia, 44, no. m (1892), p. 3.

35 L’Eco d’ltalia, a.6 (1888), nos 129, pp. 2–3, 130, p. 2, 131, p. 3.

36 See Lanzi, N., Genova citta di Maria Santissima. Storia e documenti delta pieta mariana genovese (Pisa, 1992), passim; especially pp. 9–17, 42 Google Scholar.

37 See, e.g., L’Eco d’ltalia, a.2, nos 209–10 (1884).

38 La civilta cattolica, ser.17, a.48, 1 (1898), p. 743, cited in I. Porciani, ‘Lo Statuto e il Corpus Domini. La Festa Nazionale dell’Italia liberale’, Il Risorgimento, a.47, nos 1–2 (1995), p. 173.

39 ‘Ancient and Modern Processions: since with sectarian progress religious processions are proscribed or greatly restricted, much more frequently do we see processions of a longer and more dangerous kind’: L’Eco d’ltalia, 44, no. 6 (1892), p. 1.

40 Ibid., nos 97, p. 3, 98, p. 3; Pro Porta Pila: Numero unico dell’ Eco d’ltalia (22 Dec. 1892), passim.

41 See Cambiaso, D., ‘L’anno ecclesiastico e le feste dei santi in Genova nel loro svolgimento storico’, Atti della Societa Ligure di Storia Patria, 48 (1917), pp. 28–130 Google Scholar. See also the regular Diario religioso of La settimana religiosa; ‘Ai divoti di S. Giuseppe’, ibid., a.i, no. 9 (26 Feb. 1871), pp. 76–9.

42 La donna e la famiglia: scritti di istruzione, educazione e ricreazione per le donne, 4 (Genoa, 1865), pp. 211–15.

43 Alimonda, G., I problemi del secolo XIX. Conferenze del Cardinale Alimonda recitate nella metropolitan di Genova, 4, Problemi economici (Genoa, 1876), p. 232 Google Scholar, and conferences 5 and 6, passim.

44 Cf. ‘Le due economie’, La civilta cattolica, ser.3, a.7, 3 (1856), pp. 257–72, 465–85.

45 See Talamo, S., Svolgimento del materialismo contemporaneo (Naples, 1874 Google Scholar); idem, L’Aristotelismo della scolastica nella storia della Jilosofia, 3rd edn (Siena, 1881).

46 Vito, F., ‘G. Toniolo e la cultura economica dei cattolici italiani’, in Rossini, G., ed., Aspetti della cultura cattolica nell’eta di Leone XIII (Rome, 1961), pp. 10–19 Google Scholar; R. Aubert, ‘Aspects divers du Neo-Thomisme sous le pontificat de Leon XIII’, in ibid., pp. 135–209.

47 ‘Una replica intorno all’antagonismo fra il cielo e la terra’, La civilta cattolica, ser.i, a.1, 2 (1850), pp. 260–1.

48 G. Toniolo, ‘Dell’elemento etico quale fattore intrinsico delle leggi economiche’, Trattato di economia sociale e scritti economici II in Opera omnia di Giuseppe Toniolo, ser. 2, 2 (Vatican City, 1949), pp. 266–92. See also P. Pecorari, Toniolo. Un Economista per la Democrazia (Rome, 1991), p. 44; A. Acerbi, ‘Giuseppe Toniolo, tra filosofia neoscolastica e scienza economica’, in Contributi alia concoscenza del pensiero di Giuseppe Toniolo (Pisa, 1981), pp. 59–85.

49 Traniello, F., ‘Cultura ecclesiastica e cultura cattolica’, in Chiesa e religiosita in Italia dopo I’Unità (1861-1878) (Milan, 1973), p. 22 Google Scholar. Liberatore published a collection of articles from La civilta cattolica, as Principi di economia politica (Rome, 1889). An English version (tr. E. H. Dering) appeared as Principles of Political Economy (London and New York, 1891).

50 Toniolo, ‘Dell’elemento etico’, p. 291.

51 L. Pallini, Tra politica e scienza: le vicende della cattedra di economia politica all’Universita di Torino 1800–58’, in M. M. Angello et al., eds, Le Cattedre di economia politica in Italia. La diffusione di una disciplina ‘sospetta’ (1750-1950), 3rd edn (Milan, 1992), pp. 170–2.

52 Ferrara, F., ‘Caratteri essenziali dell’economia politica’, in Bocciarelli, R. and Ciocca, P. L., eds, Scrittori italiani di economia (Rome, 1994), p. 7 Google Scholar. On Ferrara’s dogmatism see also R. Romani, L’economia politica del Risorgimento italiano (Turin, 1994), p. 188. See also Achille Loria’s article on the Italian School of Economists in R. H. I. Palgrave, A Dictionary of Political Economy, 3 vols (London and New York, 1891–4), 2: 466–7, in which he emphasises the ‘objective and positive’ enquiry which succeeded to Ferrara’s extreme dogmatism.

53 Palgrave, Dictionary, 1: 735.

54 Ibid., 1: 736.

55 Ibid., 1: 55.

56 Devas, C. S., Political Economy, 3rd edn (London, New York, Bombay, and Calcutta, 1910), pp. 636–7 Google Scholar; cf. idem, The restoration of economics to ethics’, International Journal of Ethics, 7 (1896-7), pp. 191–201.

57 Cook and Wedderburn, Works of Ruskin, 28: 82 (May 1874).