Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-01T21:57:22.559Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evangelicalism and worldliness 1770–1870

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2016

Michael Hennell
Michael Hennell*
Affiliation:
Manchester Cathedral
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

‘Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world.’ The carrying out of this injunction has been interpreted differently in different ages. Professor Rupp reminded us in an early book that sixteenth-century Puritans and Protestants were not Victorian Christians in period costume. Calvin and Knox would have been hounded by the Lord’s Day Observance Society if their views on Sunday games had been known to Victorian evangelicals. During the years 1770–1870 there was an increasing strictness and rigidity with regard to ‘the world’. First of all there was the question did the world belong to God or the devil. Most evangelicals in 1770 would have said that it belonged to God, but by Victorian times they were not so certain. Abner Brown, speaking of one parson’s wife, says: ‘When her fine manly boys came home for the holidays, she would not allow them to stand at the window of their father’s parsonage without making them turn their backs so as not to look at the romantic views by which the house was encircled, lest the loveliness of “ Satan’s earth” should alienate their affections from the better world to come.’ On the other hand Lord Mount Temple when censured by friends for attending the Queen’s fancy-dress ball replied: ‘This is God’s world by right, and not the devil’s. Our business is to subdue it to its lawful king, and not to abandon it to the enemy.’ With regard to pleasures and amusements there was a growing strictness; I was able to give an example of this with regard to the Venn family in John Venn and the Clapham Sect.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Church History , Volume 8: Popular Belief and Practice , 1972 , pp. 229 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page no 229 note 1 Jas. 1: 27.

page no 229 note 2 Rupp, E. G., Is This a Christian Country? (London 1941) p 12 Google Scholar.

page no 229 note 3 Brown, Abner, Simeon’s Conversation Parties (London 1863) p 73 Google Scholar.

page no 229 note 4 Russell, G. W. E., A Short History of the Evangelical Movement (London 1915) p 132 Google Scholar.

page no 229 note 5 Hennell, [M. M.] [John Venn and the Clapham Sect] (London 1938) p 158 Google Scholar.

page no 230 note 1 Martin, Bernard, John Newton (London 1950) p 299 Google Scholar.

page no 231 note 1 R[ecord] (London, 15 September 1834).

page no 231 note 2 R (2 October 1834).

page no 232 note 1 R (7 March 1839).

page no 232 note 2 R (21 January 1839).

page no 232 note 3 R (7 March 1839).

page no 232 note 4 R (24 January 1839).

page no 233 note 1 R (23 April 1832).

page no 233 note 2 R (27 September 1830).

page no 233 note 3 R (27 September 1832).

page no 233 note 4 R (5 July 1838).

page no 233 note 5 Stephen, Leslie, Life of Sir James Fitzjames Stephen (London 1895) p 61 Google Scholar.

page no 234 note 1 Harrison, Brian, ‘Religion and Recreation in Nineteenth Century England’, PP, XXXVIII (1967) p 100 Google Scholar.

page no 234 note 2 Freemantle, W. R., Memoir of Spencer Thornton (London 1850) p 101 Google Scholar.

page no 234 note 3 Hennell, p 23.

page no 234 note 4 Briggs, Asa, The Age of Improvement (London 1959) p 173 Google Scholar.

page no 234 note 5 R (21 June 1838).

page no 234 note 6 R (23 April 1838).

page no 235 note 1 Berwick, G., ‘Close of Cheltenham: Parish Pope’, Theology, XXXIX (London 1939) p 194 Google Scholar.

page no 235 note 2 R (14 February 1839).

page no 235 note 3 Quoted R (2 July 1838).

page no 235 note 4 R (5 April 1838).

page no 235 note 5 R (27 January 1837).

page no 236 note 1 R (5 th February 1835).