Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Review process

This journal uses a double-anonymised model of peer review. Neither author nor reviewers know the identity of each other. 

The review process is the same for each type of submission. The editors review the submission for its appropriateness and quality and decide whether to desk reject it or send it out for review. Typically, 2-3 reviewers are asked to provide feedback on the submission.

SPPQ authors may suggest appropriate reviewers and/or “oppose” individuals to review their manuscript. The editors will consult these names, but they are not obligated to use these recommendations.

Appeals

To appeal an editorial decision, contact the Editor and specify the reason for your appeal. Your appeal will be reviewed by the Editor together with another member of the editorial team who was not involved in the review of the manuscript. The final decision regarding your appeal will rest with the Editor.