Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T02:05:48.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Public Opinion and Judicial Behavior in Direct Democracy Systems: Gay Rights in the American States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Daniel C. Lewis ,
Frederick S. Wood  and
Matthew L. Jacobsmeier
Daniel C. Lewis*
Affiliation:
Siena College, Loudonville, NY, USA
Frederick S. Wood
Affiliation:
Coastal Carolina University, Conway, SC, USA
Matthew L. Jacobsmeier
Affiliation:
West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
*
Daniel C. Lewis, Siena College, 515 Loudon Rd., Loudonville, NY 12054, USA. Email: dlewis@siena.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although the U.S. judiciary is designed to be an independent and counter-majoritarian arbiter of the law, many states feature electoral institutions that may expose judges to public pressure. Scholars have demonstrated that judicial elections provide a clear link between public opinion and judicial decision making that may undermine the ability of courts to act in counter-majoritarian ways to protect minority rights. We extend this line of inquiry by examining whether direct democracy institutions have a similar effect of enhancing the impact of public opinion on judicial behavior and reducing the likelihood of judges voting in favor of minority rights. Empirical results from an analysis of gay rights cases in the American states from 1981 to 2004 provide evidence that direct democracy, in conjunction with electoral retention methods, significantly increases the effect of public opinion on judicial decisions.

Keywords

direct democracypolitical behaviorjudicial electionsjudicial politicsjudicial behaviorpolitics of sexualityidentity/group politicsissue preferencespublic opinion
Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , December 2014 , pp. 367 - 388
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arceneaux, Kevin. 2002. “Direct Democracy and the Link between Public Opinion and State Abortion Policy.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 2:372–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnum, David G. 1985. “The Supreme Court and Public Opinion: Judicial Decision Making in the Post-New Deal Period.” The Journal of Politics 47 (2): 652–66..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, William D., Ringquist, Evan J., Fording, Richard C., and Hanson, Russell L.. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-93.” American Journal of Political Science 42:327–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Alexander M. 1986. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bowler, Shaun, and Donovan, Todd. 2004. “Measuring the Effects of Direct Democracy on State Policy: Not all Initiatives Are Created Equal.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 4:345–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul, and Boyea, Brent D.. 2008. “State Public Opinion, the Death Penalty, and the Practice of Electing Judges.” American Journal of Political Science 52:360–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul, and Hall, Melinda Gann. 1997. “The Interplay of Preferences, Case Facts, Context, and Rules in the Politics of Judicial Choice.” The Journal of Politics 59:1206–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul, Hall, Melinda Gann, and Langer, Laura. 1999. “Judicial Choice and the Politics of Abortion: Institutions, Context, and the Autonomy of Courts.” Albany Law Review 62:1265–302.Google Scholar
Brace, Paul, Langer, Laura, and Hall, Melinda Gann. 2000. “Measuring the Preferences of State Supreme Court Judges.” The Journal of Politics 62:387–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burden, Barry C. 2005. “Institutions and Policy Representation in the States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 5:373–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, Bruce E., and Miller, Kenneth P.. 2001. “The Populist Legacy: Initiatives and the Undermining of Representative Government.” In Dangerous Democracy? The Battle over Ballot Initiatives in America, eds. Sabato, Larry J., Ernst, Howard R., and Larson, Bruce A. (pp. 33–61). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A., and Wright, John R.. 1988. “Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 82:1109–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canon, Bradley C., and Jaros, Dean. 1970. “External Variables, Institutional Structure & Dissent on State Supreme Courts.” Polity 3:175–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Citizens against Rent Control/Coalition for Fair Housing v. Berkeley.” 1981. U.S.Google Scholar
Comparato, Scott A. 2003. Amici Curiae and Strategic Behavior in State Supreme Courts. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
Cover, Robert M. 1982. “The Origins of Judicial Activism in the Protection of Minorities.” The Yale Law Journal 91 (7): 1287–316..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, Thomas E. 1989. Direct Democracy: The Politics of Initiative, Referendum, and Recall. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Donovan, Todd, and Tolbert, Caroline. 2013. “Do Popular Votes on Rights Create Animosity toward Minorities?” Political Research Quarterly 66 (4):910–22..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Richard. 2002. Democratic Delusions: The Initiative Process in America. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Engstrom, Richard N., and Kenny, Christopher. 2002. “The Effects of Independent Expenditures in Senate Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 55:885–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enns, Peter K., and Koch, Julianna. 2013. “Public Opinion in the U.S. States: 1956 to 2010.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 13 (3): 349–72..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Mershon, Carol. 1996. “Measuring Political Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science 40:261–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., Wright, Gerald C., and McIver, John P.. 1993. Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., Wright, Gerald C., and McIver, John P.. 2006. “Public Opinion in the States: A Quarter Century of Change and Stability.” In Public Opinion in the States, ed. J. Cohen (pp. 229–253). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eule, Julian N. 1990. “Judicial Review of Direct Democracy.” The Yale Law Journal 99:1503–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eule, Julian N. 1994. “Crocodiles in the Bathtub: State Courts, Voter Initiatives and the Threat of Electoral Reprisal.” University of Colorado Law Review 65:733–41.Google Scholar
Gamble, Barbara S. 1997. “Putting Civil Rights to a Popular Vote.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (1):245–69..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Gay & Lesbian Law Students Assn. v. Board of Trustees.” 1996. Conn.: Conn: Supreme Court.Google Scholar
Gerber, Elisabeth R. 1996. “Legislative Response to the Threat of Popular Initiatives.” American Journal of Political Science 40:99–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Elisabeth R. 1999. The Populist Paradox: Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Virginia, and Hanson, Russell L.. 2004. Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Virginia, and Hanson, Russell L.. 2008. Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Virginia, Hanson, Russell L., and Jacob, Herbert. 1999. Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Virginia, and Jacob, Herbert. 1996. Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Virginia, Jacob, Herbert, and Albritton, Robert. 1990. Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.Google Scholar
Grodin, Joseph R. 1988. “Developing a Consensus of Restraint: A Judges Perspective on Judicial Retention Elections.” Southern California Law Review 61:1961.Google Scholar
Haider-Markel, Donald P., and Meier, Kenneth J.. 1996. “The Politics of Gay and Lesbian Rights: Expanding the Scope of the Conflict.” The Journal of Politics 58:332–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider-Markel, Donald P., Querze, Alana, and Lindaman, Kara. 2007. “Lose, Win, or Draw? A Reexamination of Direct Democracy and Minority Rights.” Political Research Quarterly 60:304–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann. 1987. “Constituent Influence in State Supreme Courts: Conceptual Notes and a Case Study.” The Journal of Politics 49 (4): 1117–24..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann, and Brace, Paul. 1989. “Order in the Courts: A Neo-institutional Approach to Judicial Consensus.” Political Research Quarterly 42:391–407.Google Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann, and Brace, Paul. 1992. “Toward an Integrated Model of Judicial Voting Behavior.” American Politics Research 20:147–68.Google Scholar
Langer, Laura. 2002. Judicial Review in State Supreme Courts: A Comparative Study: Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Langer, Laura. 2006. “Multiple Actors and Competing Risks: State Supreme Court Justices and the Policymaking (Unmaking Game) of Judicial Review.” Tucson: National Science Foundation, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Lax, Jeffrey R., and Phillips, Justin H.. 2009a. “Gay Rights in the States: Public Opinion and Policy Responsiveness.” American Political Science Review 103:367–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lax, Jeffrey R., and Phillips, Justin H.. 2009b. “How Should We Estimate Public Opinion in the States?” American Journal of Political Science 53:107–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lax, Jeffrey R., and Phillips, Justin H.. 2012. “The Democratic Deficit in the States.” American Journal of Political Science 56:148–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Daniel C. 2011a. “Bypassing the Representational Filter? Minority Rights Policies under Direct Democracy Institutions in the U.S. States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 11:198–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Daniel C. 2011b. “Direct Democracy and Minority Rights: Same-Sex Marriage Bans in the U.S. States.” Social Science Quarterly 92:364–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Daniel C. 2013. Direct Democracy and Minority Rights: A Critical Assessment of the Tyranny of the Majority in the American States. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Link, Michael W. 1995. “Tracking Public Mood in the Supreme Court: Cross-Time Analyses of Criminal Procedure and Civil Rights Cases.” Political Research Quarterly 48:61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, Krupnikov, Yanna, Levine, Adam Seth, Piston, Spencer, and Hagen-Jamar, Alexander Von. 2010. “Why State Constitutions Differ in Their Treatment of Same-Sex Marriage.” The Journal of Politics 72:1222–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madison, James. [1787] 1999. “No. 10: The Same Subject Continued.” In The Federalist Papers, eds. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay (pp. 45–52). New York, NY: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Manweller, Mathew. 2004. The People vs. the Courts: Initiative Elites, Judicial Review and Direct Democracy in the American Legal System. Bethesda, MD: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Manweller, Mathew. 2005. “The Angriest Crocodile: Information Costs, Direct Democracy Activists, and the Politicization of State Judicial Elections.” State and Local Government Review 37:86–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsusaka, John G. 1995. “Fiscal Effects of the Voter Initiative—Evidence from the Last 30 Years.” Journal of Political Economy 103:587–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsusaka, John G. 2004. For the Many or the Few: The Initiative, Public Policy, and American Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsusaka, John G. 2010. “Popular Control of Public Policy: A Quantitative Approach.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 5:133–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsusaka, John G., and McCarty, Nolan M.. 2001. “Political Resource Allocation: Benefits and Costs of Voter Initiatives.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 17:413–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Kenneth P. 2009. Direct Democracy and the Courts. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishler, William, and Sheehan, Reginald S.. 1993. “The Supreme Court as a Countermajoritarian Institution? The Impact of Public Opinion on Supreme Court Decisions.” American Political Science Review 87 (1): 87–101..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacheco, Julianna. 2011. “Using National Surveys to Measure Dynamic State Public Opinion: A Guideline for Scholars and an Application.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 11 (4): 415–39..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacheco, Julianna. 2012. “The Social Contagion Model: Exploring the Role of Public Opinion on the Diffusion of Antismoking Legislation across the American States.” The Journal of Politics 74 (01): 187–202..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pak, Mihui. 1999. “The Counter-Majoritarian Difficulty in Focus: Judicial Review of Initiatives.” Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems 32:36.Google Scholar
Park, David K., Gelman, Andrew, and Bafumi, Joseph. 2004. “Bayesian Multilevel Estimation with Poststratification: State-Level Estimates from National Polls.” Political Analysis 12:375–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, David K., Gelman, Andrew, and Bafumi, Joseph. 2006. “State Level Opinions from National Surveys: Poststratification Using Multilevel Logistic Regression.” In Public Opinion in State Politics, ed. Jeffrey Cohen (pp. 208–228). Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinello, Daniel R. 2003. Gay Rights and American Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pippen, John, Bowler, Shaun, and Donovan, Todd. 2002. “Election Reform and Direct Democracy: Campaign Finance Regulations in the American States.” American Politics Research 30:559–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preuhs, Robert R. 2005. “Descriptive Representation, Legislative Leadership, and Direct Democracy: Latino Influence on English Only Laws in the States, 1984-2002.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 5:203–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchett, C. Herman. 1948. The Roosevelt Court: A Study in Judicial Politics and Values, 1937-1947. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qvortrup, Mads. 2001. “The Courts vs. the People: An Essay on Judicial Review of Initiatives.” In The Battle over Citizen Law Making, ed. Waters, M. Dane (pp. 197–210). Durham: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ranney, Austin. 1976. “Parties in State Politics.” In Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis, eds. Jacob, Herbert and Vines, Kenneth Nelson. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Rohde, David W., and Spaeth, Harold J.. 1976. Supreme Court Decision Making. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Romer, Thomas, and Rosenthal, Howard. 1979. “The Elusive Median Voter.” Journal of Public Economics 12:143–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schildkraut, Deborah J. 2001. “Official-English and the States: Influences on Declaring English the Official Language in the United States.” Political Research Quarterly 54:445–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubert, Glendon A. 1965. The Judicial Mind: The Attitudes and Ideologies of Supreme Court Justices, 1946-1963. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Silver, Nate. 2013. “How Opinion on Same-Sex Marriage Is Changing, and What It Means.” New York Times, March 26, 2013. http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/26/how-opinion-on-same-sex-marriage-is-changing-and-what-it-means/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0 (accessed September 2, 2014).Google Scholar
Songer, Donald R., Segal, Jeffrey A., and Cameron, Charles M.. 1994. “The Hierarchy of Justice: Testing a Principal-Agent Model of Supreme Court-Circuit Court Interactions.” American Journal of Political Science 38:673–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Jami K., Lewis, Daniel C., Jacobsmeier, Matthew L., and DiSarro, Brian. 2012. “Content and Complexity in Policy Reinvention and Diffusion: Gay and Transgender-Inclusive Laws against Discrimination.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 12:92–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uelmen, Gerald. 1972. “Crocodiles in the Bathtub: The Independence of State Supreme Courts in an Era of Judicial Politicalization.” Notre Dame Law Review 72:1135–53.Google Scholar