Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T07:44:39.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Latino Representation and Education: Pathways to Latino Student Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Ashley D. Ross ,
Stella M. Rouse  and
Kathleen A. Bratton
Ashley D. Ross
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
Stella M. Rouse
Affiliation:
University of Maryland
Kathleen A. Bratton
Affiliation:
Louisiana State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The rapid growth of the Latino population in the U.S. over the past 15 years has led to a significant increase in levels of primary and secondary school enrollment rates of Latino children. Research on Latino education has demonstrated the institutional and contextual challenges faced by this increasingly significant group, but studies that link Latino representation and Latino educational performance have neglected to sort out the direct and indirect effects of representation on student achievement. The central assumption in these studies outlines a causal chain running from Latino political representation (school boards), to Latino bureaucratic representation (administrators and teachers), to Latino student performance. This study tests these theoretical assumptions by employing a path analytic model using data from 1,040 Texas school districts for the years 1997–2001 to tease out the direct and indirect effects of Latino representation on Latino student achievement. We find robust evidence of the impact of Latino political representation on Latino educational attainment in Texas, operating via a direct effect on the number of Latino administrators and teachers and an indirect effect on Latino student performance. Additionally, our results demonstrate that descriptive representation becomes substantive representation in the area of education policy for Latinos and that this relationship remains strong over time. These findings underscore the importance of school board elections and school district hiring practices on Latino student performance.

Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , Spring 2010 , pp. 69 - 95
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aronson, Joshua, Lustina, Michael J., Good, Catherine, Keough, Kelli, Steele, Claude M., and Brown, Joseph. 1999. “When White Men Can't Do Math: Necessary and Sufficient Factors in Stereotype Threat.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 35:29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bali, Valentina A., and Michael Alvarez, R.. 2004. “The Race Gap in Student Achievement Scores: Longitudinal Evidence from a Racially Diverse School District.” Policy Studies Journal 32:393–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Kathleen A., and Haynie, Kerry L.. 1999. “Agenda-Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures: The Effects of Gender and Race.” The Journal of Politics 61:658–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Kathleen A. 2006. “The Behavior and Success of Latino Legislators: Evidence from the States.” Social Science Quarterly 87:1136–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Kathleen A., and Ray, Leonard P.. 2002. “Descriptive Representation, Policy Outcomes, and Municipal Day-Care Coverage in Norway.” American Journal of Political Science 46:428–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brindis C.D., A.K. Driscoll, Biggs, M.A., and Valderrama, L.T.. 2002. “Fact Sheet on Latino Youth: Income and Poverty.” San Francisco, CA: Center for Reproductive Health Research and Policy, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Health Sciences and the Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Chubb, John E., and Moe, Terry. 1990. Politics, Markets, and America's Schools. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
Darder, Antonia, Torres, Rodolfo D., and Gutierrez, Henry. 1997. Latinos and Education: A Critical Reader. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Figlio, David N. 1999. “Functional Form and the Estimated Effects of School Resources.” Economics of Education Review 18:241–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraga, Luis R., Meier, Kenneth J., and England, Robert E.. 1986. “Hispanic Americans and Educational Policy: Limits to Equal Access.” The Journal of Politics 48:850–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Margaret A. 2002. “The New Latino Diaspora and Educational Policy.” In Education in the New Latino Diaspora: Policy and the Politics of Identity. Eds., StantonGoogle Scholar
Wortham, Enrique G. Murillo, Murillo, Enrique G. Jr., and Hamann, Edmund T.. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Hanushek, Eric A. 1981. “Throwing Money at Schools.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 1:19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanushek, Eric A. 1998. “Conclusion and Controversies about the Effectiveness of School Resources.” Economic Policy Review 4:11–28.Google Scholar
Haynie, Kerry. 2000. African American Legislators in the American States. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hess, Frederick, and Leal, David. 1997. “Minority Teachers, Minority Students, and College Matriculation: A New Look at the Role-Modeling Hypothesis.” Policy Studies Journal 25:235–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyle, Rick H., and Panter, Abigail T.. 1995. “Writing About Structural Equation Models.” In Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. Ed., Hoyle, Rick H.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hu, Li-tze, and M., Bentler Peter 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling 6:1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, Brinck, and Miller, Will. 1997. “Latino Representation: It's Direct and Indirect.” American Journal of Political Science 41:1066–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leal, David L., and Hess, Frederick M.. 2000. “The Politics of Education Expenditures in Urban School Districts.” Social Science Quarterly 81:1064–72.Google Scholar
Leal, David L., Martinez-Ebers, Valerie, and Meier, Kenneth J.. 2004. “The Politics of Latino Education: The Biases of At-Large Elections.” The Journal of Politics 66:1224–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipsky, Michael. 1980. Street Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Llagas, Charmaine. 2003. Status and Trends in the Education of Hispanics (NCES 2003–008). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent Yes.” The Journal of Politics 61:628–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez-Ebers, Valerie, Fraga, Luis, Lopez, Linda, and Vega, Arturo. 2000. “Latino Interests in Education, Health, and Criminal Justice Policy.” PS: Political Science and Politics 33:547–54.Google Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J. 1993. “Representative Bureaucracy: A Theoretical and Empirical Exposition.” Research in Public Administration 2:1–35.Google Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J. 2005. “The Texas Minority Education Study.” College Station, TX: Project for Equity, Representation, and Governance, Texas A&M University.Google Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J., and England, Robert E.. 1984. “Black Representation and Educational Policy: Are They Related?” American Political Science Review 78:392–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J., Juenke, Eric Gonzalez, Wrinkle, Robert D., and Polinard, J.L.. 2005. “Structural Choices and Representational Biases: The Post-Election Color of Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 49:758–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J., and O'Toole, Laurence J. Jr. 2006. “Political Control versus Bureaucratic Values: Reframing the Debate.” Public Administration Review 66:177–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J., Polinard, J.L., and Wrinkle, Robert D.. 2000. “Bureaucracy and Organizational Performance: Causality Arguments about Schools.” American Journal of Political Science 44:590–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J., and Stewart, Joseph Jr. 1991. The Politics of Hispanic Education. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J., Stewart, Joseph Jr., and England, Robert E.. 1991. “The Politics of Bureaucratic Discretion: Educational Access as an Urban Service.” American Journal of Political Science 35:155–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J., Wrinkle, Robert D., and Polinard, J.L.. 1999. “Representative Bureaucracy and Distributional Equity: Addressing the Hard Question.” The Journal of Politics 61:1025–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Center for Education Statistics. 2002. Status and Trends in the Education of Hispanics. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education (http://nces.ed.gov).Google Scholar
National Center for Education Statistics. 2008. The Condition of Education 2008. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education (http://nces.ed.gov).Google Scholar
Nicholson-Crotty, Sean, and Meier, Kenneth J.. 2002. “Size Doesn't Matter: In Defense of Single-State Studies.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 2:411–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pew Hispanic Center/Kaiser Family Foundation. 2004. National Survey of Latinos: Education. http://pewhispanic.org/files/reports/25.pdf (October 4, 2009).Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polinard, J.L., Wrinkle, Robert D., and Longoria, Thomas. 1990. “Education and Governance: Representational Links to Second Generation Discrimination.” Western Political Quarterly 43:631–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preuhs, Robert R. 2007. “Descriptive Representation as a Mechanism to Mitigate Policy Backlash.” Political Research Quarterly 60:277–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, Richard W., and Pompa, Delia. 1998. Improving Opportunities: Strategies from the Secretary of Education for Hispanic and Limited English Proficient Students. A Response to the Hispanic Dropout Project. Washington, DC: Office of Bilingual Education and Minority Languages Affairs, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
Shockley, J.S. 1974. Chicano Revolt in a Texas Town. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Slobogin, Kathy. 2001. “Education, Texas Style: Effectiveness of Yearly Testing Questioned.” CNNFYI.com, February 27.: http://cnnstudentnews.cnn.com/2001/fyi/teachers.ednews/02/23/texas.tests/index.html (February 27, 2001).Google Scholar
Smith, Kevin B., and Larimer, Christopher W.. 2004. “A Mixed Relationship: Bureaucracy and School Performance.” Public Administration Review 64:728–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Kevin B., and Meier, Kenneth J.. 1994. “Politics, Bureaucrats, and Schools.” Public Administration Review 54:551–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, Claude M. 1997. “A Threat in the Air: How Stereotypes Shape Intellectual Identity and Performance.” American Psychologist 52:613–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steele, Claude M., and Aronson, Joshua. 1995. “Stereotype Threat and the Intellectual Test Performance of African-Americans.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69:797–811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, Joseph Jr., England, Robert E., and Meier, Kenneth J.. 1989. “Black Representation in Urban School Districts: From School Board to Office to Classroom.” Western Political Quarterly 42:287–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Atiya Kai. 2003. “Latino Group Consciousness and Political Participation.” American Politics Research 31:361–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swers, Michele. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau. 2000. “Fast Facts for Congress.” http://fastfacts.census.gov (October 4, 2009).Google Scholar
Wenglinski, Harold. 1997. “How Money Matters: The Effect of School District Spending on Academic Achievement.” Sociology of Education 70:221–37.Google Scholar