Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T06:36:41.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Incumbents Out, Party In? Term Limits and Partisan Redistricting in State Legislatures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Brian F. Schaffner ,
Michael W. Wagner  and
Jonathan Winburn
Brian F. Schaffner
Affiliation:
American University
Michael W. Wagner
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Jonathan Winburn
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How do term limits affect the electoral changes caused by state legislative redistricting? To answer this question, we compare the success of majority parties in the redistricting process in legislatures with and without term limits. We hypothesize that majority parties use the districts of term-limited members to redistribute supporters from safe districts to more competitive ones. We find that, indeed, the majority party changes district lines more in districts with term-limited legislators. Furthermore, the majority party is more strategic in reallocating voters for partisan gain in term-limited districts. Thus, our findings suggest that term limits make the redistricting process more partisan and that a reform intended to remove incumbents from the legislature actually strengthens the majority party.

It's ironic that one of the few things that the U.S. Supreme Court has consistently upheld as a factor you can use in redrawing districts is incumbency, and we're going to be redrawing state legislative districts right after term limits take effect in the Senate. We won't have any incumbents in those districts.

—Arkansas Attorney General Mark Pryor

Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , Winter 2004 , pp. 396 - 414
Copyright
Copyright © Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alchian, Armen, and Demsetz, Harold. 1972. “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization.” American Economic Review 62:777–95.Google Scholar
Basehart, Harry, and Comer, John. 1991. “Partisan and Incumbent Effects in State Legislative Redistricting.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 16:65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basehart, Harry, and Comer, John. 1995. “Redistricting and Incumbent Reelection Success in Five State Legislatures.” American Politics Quarterly 23:241–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, David, and Cain, Bruce. 1992. Congressional Redistricting: Comparative and Theoretical Perspectives. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Cain, Bruce E. 1985. “Assessing the Partisan Effects of Redistricting.” American Political Science Review 79:320–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campagna, Janet C. 1991. “Bias and Responsiveness in the Seat-Vote Relationship.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 16:81–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caress, Stanley M. 1996. “The Impact of Term Limits on Legislative Behavior: An Examination of a Transitional Legislature.” PS: Political Science and Politics 29: 671–6.Google Scholar
Cohen, Sharon. 2000. “Peak Turnover of State Lawmakers Expected on Election Day,” Associated Press (Michigan), 21 October. Retrieved from Lexis-Nexis database, June 23, 2003.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary, and Katz, Jonathan. 2002. Elbridge Gerry's Salamander: The Electoral Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, Rick. 2002. “The Future of Political Parties in Term-Limited State Legislatures.” Spectrum: Journal of State Government 75:14–7.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. Jr. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and King, Gary. 1994. “Enhancing Democracy through Legislative Redistricting.” American Political Science Review 88:541–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glazer, Amihai, Grofman, Bernard, and Robbins, Marc. 1987. “Partisan and Incumbency Effects of 1970s Congressional Redistricting.” American Journal of Political Science 31:680–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedlund, Ronald D., and Hamm, Keith E.. 1996. “Political Parties as Vehicles for Organizing U.S. State Legislative Committees.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 21:383–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbing, John R. 1991. “Contours of the Modern Congressional Career.” American Political Science Review 85: 405–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. 1955. The Age of Reform: From Bryan to FDR. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Jewell, Malcolm. 1962. The Politics of Reapportionment. New York: Atherton.Google Scholar
Jewell, Malcolm E., and Morehouse, Sarah M.. 2001. Political Parties and Elections in the American States. 4th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, Michael. 2004. “A Comparative Analysis of Redistricting Institutions in the United States.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 4:371–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moncrief, Gary F., Thompson, Joel A., Haddon, Michael, and Hoyer, Robert. 1992. “For Whom the Bell Tolls: Term Limits and State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17: 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Conference of State Legislatures. 1999. State Redistricting Profiles 2000. Washington, DC: National Conference of State Legislatures.Google Scholar
Niemi, Richard G., and Jackman, Simon. 1991. “Bias and Responsiveness in State Legislative Districting.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 16:183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overby, L. Marvin, and Cosgrove, Kenneth M.. 1996. “Unintended Consequences? Racial Redistricting and the Representation of Minority Interests.” Journal of Politics 58:540–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, Guillermo, and Grofman, Bernard N.. 1988. “Optimal Partisan Gerrymandering.” Political Geography Quarterly 7:5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petracca, Mark P. 1993. “A New Defense of State-Imposed Congressional Term Limits.” PS: Political Science and Politics 26:700–5.Google Scholar
Schaffner, Brian F., Streb, Matt J., and Wright, Gerald C.. 2001. “Teams without Uniforms: The Nonpartisan Ballot in State and Local Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 54: 7–30.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Joseph. 1966. Ambition and Politics: Political Careers in the United States. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 1985. “Results of Partisan Redistricting in Seven U.S. States during the 1970s.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 10:259–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 1995. “The Partisan Consequences of Congressional Redistricting.” American Politics Quarterly 23:229–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Doug. 2000. “Fayetteville 3rd District Will Shrink, Pryor Predicts,” Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, 3 March, B5.Google Scholar
Weintraub, Daniel M. 2002. “The Trouble with Term Limits.” State Legislatures 28:40–3.Google Scholar
Wildermuth, John. 2001. “State Redistricting Pie Will Be Hard to Cut; Redistricting Could Cost in Bay Area,” The San Francisco Chronicle, 4 April, A3.Google Scholar
Will, George F. 1992. Restoration: Congress, Term Limits, and the Recovery of Deliberative Democracy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Gerald C., and Schaffner, Brian F.. 2002. “The Influence of Party: Evidence from State Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 96:367–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar