Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-10T13:08:12.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Formal Authority, Persuasive Power, and Effectiveness in State Legislatures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Barry Edwards
Barry Edwards*
Affiliation:
University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
*
Barry Edwards, Department of Political Science, University of Central Florida, 4297 Andromeda Loop N., Howard Phillips Hall, Room 311A, Orlando, FL 32816, USA. Email: barry.edwards@ucf.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

What makes some lawmakers more effective than others is a central question in American politics. Recent research has emphasized the role of informal, persuasive leadership, but this research has focused almost exclusively on Congress, so it is unclear whether this approach to lawmaking is generally effective. Analysis of state legislatures is hampered by the lack of a theoretically sound and practically feasible measure of legislative effectiveness. I offer a solution to the primary problem with traditional hit rates. I apply this approach to North Carolina legislators and show my effectiveness estimates correspond with expert evaluations. I then examine recent terms of the Michigan, Georgia, and North Carolina legislatures to evaluate the relative importance of formal and informal powers at the state level. I hypothesize and find that informal, persuasive leadership is not effective in state legislatures where lawmaking is better explained by formal, hierarchical authority.

Keywords

legislative behaviorlegislative politicscomparative legislatureslegislative professionalismlegislative effectiveness
Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , September 2018 , pp. 324 - 346
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, William D., Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Sinclair-Chapman, Valeria. 2003. “The Keys to Legislative Success in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28 (3): 357–86..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anzia, Sarah F., and Berry, Christopher R.. 2011. “The Jackie (and Jill) Robinson Effect: Why Do Congresswomen Outperform Congressmen?” American Journal of Political Science 55 (3): 478–93..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, Laura W., Deen, Rebecca E., and Patterson, Samuel C.. 2000. “Friendship and Votes: The Impact of Interpersonal Ties on Legislative Decision Making.” State and Local Government Review 32 (2): 142–47..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battista, James Coleman. 2011. “Formal and Perceived Leadership Power in U.S. State Legislatures.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 11 (1): 102–18..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Tobin Grant, J.. 1999. “All in a Day's Work: The Financial Rewards of Legislative Effectiveness.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 24 (4): 511–23..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Christina L. 2013. “She'll Settle It?” Journal of Law and Courts 1 (2): 193–219.. doi:10.1086/670723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandes, Ulrik, and Erleback, Thomas. 2005. Network Analysis: Methodological Foundations. Vol. 3418. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Kathleen A. 2005. “Critical Mass Theory Revisited: The Behavior and Success of Token Women in State Legislatures.” Politics & Gender 1 (1): 97–125..Google Scholar
Bratton, Kathleen A. 2006. “The Behavior and Success of Latino Legislators: Evidence from the States.” Social Science Quarterly 87 (5): 1136–57..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Kathleen A., and Haynie, Kerry L.. 1999. “Agenda Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures: The Effects of Gender and Race.” Journal of Politics 61:658–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, Matthew, Giraudy, Eugenia, Katz-Samuels, Julian, Walsh, Joe, Willis, Derek, Haynes, Lauren, and Ghani, Rayid. 2016. “The Legislative Influence Detector: Finding Text Reuse in State Legislation.” Proceedings of the 22nd Association for Computing Machinery's Special Interest Group on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining International Conference.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, Ronald S. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Carey, John M., Niemi, Richard G., Powell, Lynda W., and Moncrief, Gary F.. 2006. “The Effects of Term Limits on State Legislatures: A New Survey of the 50 States.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 31 (1): 105–34..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, Wendy K. Tam, and Fowler, James H.. 2010. “Legislative Success in a Small World: Social Network Analysis and the Dynamics of Congressional Legislation.” Journal of Politics 72 (1): 124–35..Google Scholar
Clucas, Richard A. 2007. “Legislative Professionalism and the Power of State House Leaders.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 7 (1): 1–19..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csardi, Gabor, and Nepusz, Tamas. 2006. “The igraph Software Package for Complex Network Research.” InterJournal, Complex Systems 1695 (5): 1–9..Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1957. “The Concept of Power.” Behavioral Science 2 (3): 201–15..Google Scholar
Esterling, Kevin M. 2007. “Buying Expertise: Campaign Contributions and Attention to Policy Analysis in Congressional Committees.” American Political Science Review 101 (1): 93–109..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, James H. 2006. “Connecting the Congress: A Study of Cosponsorship Networks.” Political Analysis 14 (4): 456–87..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamm, Gerald, and Kousser, Thad. 2013. “No Strength in Numbers: The Failure of Big-City Bills in American State Legislatures, 1880–2000.” American Political Science Review 107 (4): 663–78..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Richard L. 1987. “Participation and Purpose in Committee Decision Making.” American Political Science Review 81 (1): 105–27..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Richard L. 1992. “Measuring Legislative Influence.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17 (2): 205–31..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasecke, Edward B., and Mycoff, Jason D.. 2007. “Party Loyalty and Legislative Success Are Loyal Majority Party Members More Successful in the U.S. House of Representatives?” Political Research Quarterly 60 (4): 607–17..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynie, Kerry L. 2002. “The Color of Their Skin or the Content of Their Behavior? Race and Perceptions of African American Legislators.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 27 (2): 295–314..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kernell, Samuel. 1977. “Toward Understanding 19th Century Congressional Careers: Ambition, Competition, and Rotation.” American Journal of Political Science 21:669–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkland, Justin H. 2011. “The Relational Determinants of Legislative Outcomes: Strong and Weak Ties between Legislators.” Journal of Politics 73 (3): 887–98..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klarner, Carl, Berry, William D., Carsey, Thomas M., Jewell, Malcolm, Niemi, Richard G., Powell, Lynda W., and Snyder, James M.. 2013. State Legislative Election Returns (1967-2010). Edited by University of North Carolina. Ann Arbor: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
Knoke, David, and Yang, Song. 2008. Social Network Analysis. Vol. 154. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kousser, Thad. 2005. Term Limits and the Dismantling of State Legislative Professionalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lazer, David. 2011. “Networks in Political Science: Back to the Future.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44 (1): 61–68..Google Scholar
Leana, Carrie R., and Van Buren, Harry J.. 1999. “Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices.” Academy of Management Review 24 (3): 538–55..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maisel, L. Sandy. 2010. “Rating United States Senators: The Strength of Maine's Delegation since 1955.” The New England Journal of Political Science 4 (1): 5–41..Google Scholar
Matthews, Donald R. 1959. “The Folkways of the United States Senate: Conformity to Group Norms and Legislative Effectiveness.” American Political Science Review 53 (4): 1064–89..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Donald R. 1960. U.S. Senators and Their World. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 2004. Congress: The Electoral Connection, Second Edition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Miquel, Gerard Padro I., and Snyder, James M.. 2006. “Legislative Effectiveness and Legislative Careers.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 31 (3): 347–81..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, Terry M. 2005. “Power and Political Institutions.” Perspectives on Politics 3 (2): 215–33..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moncrief, Gary F., Niemi, Richard G., and Powell, Lynda W.. 2004. “Time, Term Limits, and Turnover: Trends in Membership Stability in U.S. State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29 (3): 357–81..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, Christopher Z. 2013. “Explaining Legislative Leadership Influence: Simple Collective Action or Conditional Explanations?” Political Research Quarterly 66 (3): 559–71..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Michael K., and Thomas, Sue. 1991. “Explaining Legislative Success in the U.S. Senate: The Role of the Majority and Minority Parties.” The Western Political Quarterly 44:959–70.Google Scholar
National Conference of State Legislatures. 1996. “Inside the Legislative Process.” http://www.ncsl.org/research/about-state-legislatures/inside-the-legislative-process.aspx.Google Scholar
North Carolina Center for Public Policy Research. 2012. “Rankings of Effectiveness, Attendance, and Roll Call Voting Participation for the North Carolina General Assembly.”https://nccppr.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Rankings_of_Effectiveness_Attendance_and_Roll_Call_Voting_Participation_for_the_2011_North_Carolina_General_Assembly.pdf.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S. 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. Cambridge: Perseus Books Group.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Tip, and Hymel, Gary. 1994. All Politics Is Local, and Other Rules of the Game. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
Payne, James L. 1980. “Show Horses & Work Horses in the United States House of Representatives.” Polity 12:428–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peoples, Clayton D. 2008. “Interlegislator Relations and Policy Making: A Sociological Study of Roll-Call Voting in a State Legislature.” Sociological Forum 23:455–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reingold, Beth. 1996. “Conflict and Cooperation: Legislative Strategies and Concepts of Power among Female and Male State Legislators.” Journal of Politics 58:464–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, Cindy Simon. 1998. When Women Lead: Integrative Leadership in State Legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Cindy Simon. 2002. Women Transforming Congress. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Sarbaugh-Thompson, Marjorie, Thompson, Lyke, Elder, Charles D., Strate, John, and Elling, Richard. 2004. The Political and Institutional Effects of Term Limits. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarbaugh-Thompson, Marjorie, Thompson, Lyke, Elder, Charles D., Comins, Meg, Elling, Richard C, and Strate, John. 2006. “Democracy Among Strangers: Term Limits' Effects on Relationships between State Legislators in Michigan.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 6 (4): 384–409..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seibert, Scott E., Kraimer, Maria L., and Liden, Robert C.. 2001. “A Social Capital Theory of Career Success.” Academy of Management Journal 44 (2): 219–37..Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1987. “The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power.” American Political Science Review 81 (1): 85–104..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shor, Boris, and McCarty, Nolan. 2011. “The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 105 (3): 530–51..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 1988a. “Career Opportunities and Membership Stability in Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 13 (1): 65–82..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 1988b. “Member Career Opportunities and the Internal Organization of Legislatures.” Journal of Politics 50 (3): 726–44..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 1992a. “Legislative Professionalism and Membership Diversity in State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17:69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 1992b. “The Theory of Legislative Institutionalization and the California Assembly.” Journal of Politics 54 (4): 1026–54..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 2007. “Measuring State Legislative Professionalism: The Squire Index Revisited.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 7 (2): 211–27..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 2017. “A Squire Index Update.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 17 (4): 361–71..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Peverill, and Hamm, Keith E.. 2005. 101 Chambers: Congress, State Legislatures, and the Future of Legislative Studies. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Swift, Clint S, and VanderMolen, Kathryn A. 2016. “Term Limits and Collaboration Across the Aisle: An Analysis of Bipartisan Cosponsorship in Term Limited and Non-Term Limited State Legislatures.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 16 (2):198–226..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsai, Wenpin, and Ghoshal, Sumantra. 1998. “Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks.” Academy of Management Journal 41 (4): 464–76..Google Scholar
Volden, Craig, and Wiseman, Alan E.. 2009. “Legislative Effectiveness in Congress.” Manuscript, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Volden, Craig, and Wiseman, Alan E.. 2014. Legislative Effectiveness in the United States Congress: The Lawmakers. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volden, Craig, Wiseman, Alan E., and Wittmer, Dana E.. 2013. “When Are Women More Effective Lawmakers than Men?” American Journal of Political Science 57 (2): 326–41..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Michael D., Stovel, Katherine, and Sacks, Audrey. 2011. “Network Analysis and Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 14:245–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkerson, John, Smith, David, and Stramp, Nicholas. 2015. “Tracing the Flow of Policy Ideas in Legislatures: A Text Reuse Approach.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (4): 943–56..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Edwards supplementary material

Appendix

Download Edwards supplementary material(File)
File 83.7 KB