Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-ns2hh Total loading time: 0.431 Render date: 2022-09-25T06:14:10.506Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Judging Judicial Review in the American States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Charles Crabtree*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Michael J. Nelson
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
*
Michael J. Nelson, The Pennsylvania State University, 232 Pond Laboratory, University Park, PA 16802, USA. Email: mjn15@psu.edu

Abstract

Does the use of judicial review by unelected judges harm public support for their decisions? Scholars have often answered this question in the affirmative. We examine the extent to which the use of judicial review reduces the ability of judges to achieve acceptance of their decisions, arguing that decisions made by elected judges may be more palatable to the public. Our experimental evidence demonstrates that the public is less prone to accept both decisions made by appointed judges and judicial decisions that strike down laws. However, the public is no more likely to accept the use of judicial review by an appointed court than an elected court. The results have implications both for institutional design in the American states and the microfoundations of judicial independence.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asch, Solomon E. 1956. “Studies of Independence and Conformity: I. A Minority of One Against a Unanimous Majority.” Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 70:170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnum, David C. 1985. “The Supreme Court and Public Opinion: Judicial Decision Making in the Post New Deal Period.” Journal of Politics 47:652665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Brandon L., and Johnston, Christopher D.. 2013. “On the Ideological Foundations of Supreme Court Legitimacy in the American Public.” American Journal of Political Science 57:711781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Brandon L., and Mutz, Diana C.. 2009. “Explaining Processes of Institutional Opinion Leadership.” American Journal of Political Science 71:249261.Google Scholar
Benesh, Sara C. 2006. “Understanding Public Confidence in American Courts.” American Journal of Political Science 68:697707.Google Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J., Huber, Gregory A., and Lenz, Gabriel S.. 2012. “Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon. Com's Mechanical Turk.” Political Analysis 20 (3): 351368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, William D., Golder, Matt, and Milton, Daniel. 2012. “Improving Tests of Theories Positing Interaction.” The Journal of Politics 74 (3): 653671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Alexander M. 1962. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Brace, Paul, and Boyea, Brent D.. 2008. “State Public Opinion, the Death Penalty, and the Practice of Electing Judges.” American Journal of Political Science 52:360372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brambor, Thomas, Clark, William Roberts, and Golder, Matt. 2005. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses.” Political Analysis 14 (1): 6382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan Center for Justice. 2010. “Buying Time 2010.” (accessed May 1, 2016).Google Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A. 1986. “Neither the Purse Nor the Sword: Dynamics of Public Confidence in the Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 80 (4): 12091226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A., and Gibson, James L.. 1992. “The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 36:635664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canes-Wrone, Brandice, and Clark, Tom S.. 2009. “Judicial Independence and Nonpartisan Elections.” Wisconsin Law Review 2009:2165.Google Scholar
Canes-Wrone, Brandice, Clark, Tom S., and Kelly, Jason P.. 2014. “Judicial Selection and Death Penalty Decisions.” American Political Science Review 108 (1): 2339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cann, Damon M., and Wilhelm, Teena. 2011. “Case Visibility and the Electoral Connection in State Supreme Courts.” American Politics Research 39:557581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cann, Damon M., and Yates, Jeff. 2008. “Homegrown Institutional Legitimacy: Assessing Citizens' Diffuse Support for State Courts.” American Politics Research 36:297329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cann, Damon M., and Yates, Jeff. 2016. These Estimable Courts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Tom S. 2009. “The Separation of Powers, Court Curbing, and Judicial Legitimacy.” American Journal of Political Science 53:971989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Tom S. 2011. The Limits of Judicial Independence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clifford, Scott, Jewell, Ryan M., and Waggoner, Philip D.. 2015. “Are Samples Drawn from Mechanical Turk Valid for Research on Political Ideology?Research & Politics 2 (4): 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crabtree, Charles, and Fariss, Christopher J.. 2016. “Stylized Facts and Experimentation.” Sociological Science 3:910914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croley, Steven P. 1995. “The Majoritarian Difficulty: Elective Judiciaries and the Rule of Law.” University of Chicago Law Review 62:689794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dafoe, Allan, Zhang, Baobao, and Caughey, Devin. 2018. “Information Equivalence in Survey Experiments.” Political Analysis 26:399416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1957. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker.” Journal of Public Law 6:279295.Google Scholar
Dorf, Michael C. 2010. “The Majoritarian Difficulty and Theories of Constitutional Decision Making.” Journal of Constitutional Law 13 (2): 283304.Google Scholar
Easton, David. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Knight, Jack, and Martin, Andrew D.. 2001. “The Supreme Court as a Strategic National Policymaker.” Emory Law Journal 50:583611.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Martin, Andrew D.. 2010. “Does Public Opinion Influence the Supreme Court? Possibly Yes (But We're Not Sure Why).” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 13:263281.Google Scholar
Firth, Kristin, Hoffman, David A., and Wilkinson-Ryan, Tess. 2017. “Law and Psychology Grows Up, Goes Online, and Replicates.” Working Paper. (accessed January 21, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Charles H., and Kosaki, Liane C.. 1989. “Republican Schoolmaster: The U.S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion and Abortion.” American Political Science Review 83:751771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, Barry. 2009. The Will of the People: How Public Opinion Has Influenced the Supreme Court and Shaped the Meaning of the Constitution. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
Frost, Amanda, and Lindquist, Stefanie A.. 2010. “Countering the Majoritarian Difficulty.” Virginia Law Review 96:719798.Google Scholar
Furth-Matzkin, Meirav, and Sunstein, Cass R.. 2018. “Social Influences on Policy Preferences: Conformity and Reactance.” Minnesota Law Review 102:13391379.Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., and Green, Donald P.. 2012. Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. 2012. Electing Judges: The Surprising Effects of Campaigning on Judicial Legitimacy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., Caldeira, Gregory A., and Spence, Lester Kenyatta. 2005. “Why Do People Accept Public Policies They Oppose” Testing Legitimacy Theory with a Survey-Based Experiment.“ Political Research Quarterly 58 (2): 187201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., Lodge, Milton, and Woodson, Benjamin. 2014. “Losing, but Accepting: Legitimacy, Positivity Theory, and the Symbols of Judicial Authority.” Law & Society Review 48 (4): 837866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Nelson, Michael J.. 2014. “The Legitimacy of the US Supreme Court: Conventional Wisdoms and Recent Challenges Thereto.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 10:201219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Nelson, Michael J.. 2015. “Is the U.S. Supreme Court's Legitimacy Grounded in Performance Satisfaction and Ideology?American Journal of Political Science 59 (1): 162174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Nelson, Michael J.. 2017. “Reconsidering Positivity Theory: What Roles do Politicization, Ideological Disagreement, and Legal Realism Play in Shaping U.S. Supreme Court Legitimacy?Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 14 (3): 592617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graber, Mark A. 1993. “The Nonmajoritarian Difficulty: Legislative Deference to the Judiciary.” Studies in American Political Development 7:3573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graber, Mark A. 2005. “Constructing Judicial Review.” Annual Review of Political Science 8:425451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Kermit L. 1983. “The Judiciary on Trial: State Constitutional Reform and the Rise of an Elected Judiciary, 1846-1860.” The Historian 45 (3): 337354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Kermit L. 1984. “Progressive Reform and the Decline of Democratic Accountability: The Popular Election of State Supreme Court Judges, 1850-1920.” American Bar Foundation Research Journal 2 (9): 345369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Kermit L. 2005. “Judicial Independence and the Majoritarian Difficulty.” In The Judicial Branch, eds. Hall, Kermit L., and McGuire, Kevin T.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 6088.Google Scholar
Hall, Matthew E. K., and Ura, Joseph Daniel. 2015. “Judicial Majoritarianism.” Journal of Politics 77 (3): 818832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann. 1987. “Constituent Influence in State Supreme Courts: Conceptual Notes and a Case Study.” Journal of Politics 49:11171124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann. 1992. “Electoral Politics and Strategic Voting in State Supreme Courts.” Journal of Politics 54:427446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Melinda Gann. 2001. “State Supreme Courts in American Democracy: Probing the Myths of Judicial Reform.” American Political Science Review 95:315330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansford, Thomas G., Intawan, Chanita, and Nicholson, Stephen P.. 2018. “Snap Judgment: Implicit Perceptions of a (Political) Court.” Political Behavior 40 (2): 127147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huff, Connor, and Tingley, Dustin. 2015. “'Who Are These People?” Evaluating the Demographic Characteristics and Political Preferences of MTurk Survey Respondents.“ Research & Politics 2 (3): 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastellec, Jonathan P. 2016. “Empirically Evaluating the Countermajoritarian Difficulty: Public Opinion, State Policy, and Judicial Review before Roe V. Wade.” Journal of Law and Courts 4 (1): 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klarman, Michael J. 1997. “Majoritarian Judicial Review: The Entrenchment Problem.” Georgetown Law Journal 85:491553.Google Scholar
Langer, Laura. 2002. Judicial Review in State Supreme Courts: A Comparative Study. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Lin, Winston, and Green, Donald P.. 2016. “Standard Operating Procedures: A Safety Net for Pre-Analysis Plans.” PS: Political Science & Politics 49 (3): 495500.Google Scholar
Marshall, Thomas R. 1989. Public Opinion and the Supreme Court. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Marshall, Thomas R. 2008. Public Opinion and the Rehnquist Court. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeffrey. 1992. “Institutional Legitimacy, Policy Legitimacy and the Supreme Court.” American Politics Quarterly 20 (4): 457477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Michael J. 2016. “Judicial Elections and Support for State Courts.” In Judicial Elections in the 21st Century, eds. Bonneau, Chris W., and Hall, Melinda Gann. New York: Routledge, 217232.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Stephen P., and Hansford, Thomas G.. 2014. “Partisans in Robes: Party Cues and Public Acceptance of Supreme Court Decisions.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (3): 620636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nownes, Anthony J., and Glennon, Colin. 2016. “An Experimental Investigation of How Judicial Elections Affect Public Faith in the Judicial System.” Law & Social Inquiry 41:3760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, James R. 2001. “Information and Judicial Review: A Signaling Game of Legislative-Judicial Interaction.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (2): 8499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 2008. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change“ 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, Joanna M. 2009. “Are Appointed Judges Strategic Too?Duke Law Journal 58:15891626.Google Scholar
Shugerman, Jed Handelsman. 2010. “Economic Crisis and the Rise of Judicial Elections and Judicial Review.” Harvard Law Review 123:10611150.Google Scholar
Shugerman, Jed Handelsman. 2012. The People's Courts. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solum, Lawrence. 2014. “The Counter-Majoritarian Difficulty.” Legal Theory Lexicon. (accessed March 13, 2018).Google Scholar
Stephenson, Matthew C. 2003. “‘When the Devil Turns . . .‘: The Political Foundations of Independent Judicial Review.” Journal of Legal Studies 32:5989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 2006. “Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation.” Annual Review of Psychology 57 (1): 375400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ura, Joseph Daniel. 2014. “Backlash and Legitimation: Macro Political Responses to Supreme Court Decisions.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (1): 110126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vannette, Dave. 2017. “Using Attention Checks in Your Surveys May Harm Data Quality.” Qualtrics Blog, June 28. (accessed September 9, 2017).Google Scholar
Watts, Duncan J., and Dodds, Peter Sheridan. 2007. “Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation.” Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 34:441458.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith. 2005. “‘Interpose Your Friendly Hand’: Political Supports for the Exercise of Judicial Review by the United States Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 99:583596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodson, Benjamin. 2015. “Politicization and the Two Modes of Evaluating Judicial Decisions.” Journal of Law and Courts 3 (2): 110126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodson, Benjamin. 2017. “The Two Opposing Effects of Judicial Elections on Legitimacy Perceptions.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 17:2446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Crabtree and Nelson supplementary material

Appendix

Download Crabtree and Nelson supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 364 KB

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Judging Judicial Review in the American States
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Judging Judicial Review in the American States
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Judging Judicial Review in the American States
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *