Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T07:23:19.248Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factor Structure of the Gratitude Questionnaire in a Spanish Sample

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2018

Alejandro Magallares ,
Patricia Recio  and
Pilar Sanjuán
Alejandro Magallares*
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (Spain)
Patricia Recio
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (Spain)
Pilar Sanjuán
Affiliation:
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (Spain)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Alejandro Magallares. Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia. Departamento de Psicología Social. Calle Juan del Rosal, 10, Ciudad Universitaria, 28040 Madrid (Spain). E-mail: amagallares@psi.uned.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Gratitude Questionnaire is a short, self-report measure of the disposition to experience gratitude. The Gratitude Questionnaire has been validated in several countries but its factor structure remains controversial. Therefore, the main goal of the study was to examine the factor structure of the Gratitude Questionnaire in a Spanish sample. Two samples were recruited (957 and 920 participants). The confirmatory factor analyses showed that the best fit was the five-item model with errors of item four and five correlated (CFI = .99, NFI = .99, RMSEA = .02). This model demonstrated partial cross-validity based on an analysis of factorial invariance. The Composite Reliability of the five-item Gratitude Questionnaire was .81. In addition, it was found that gratitude was positively related to subjective and psychological well-being. Specifically, the Gratitude Questionnaire was positively correlated to life satisfaction (r = .56, p < .01), affect balance (r = .46, p < .01), self-acceptance (r = .54, p < .01), positive relations (r = .44, p < .01), autonomy (r = .17, p < .01), environmental mastery (r = .49, p < .01), personal growth (r = .36, p < .01), and purpose in life (r = .50, p < .01). According to the results, it can be concluded that the Spanish version of the five-item Gratitude Questionnaire possessed better psychometric properties than the original six-item model.

Keywords

cross-validationgratitudeGratitude Questionnairepsychological well-beingsubjective well-being
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 21 , 2018 , E53
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, M. G., & Fagley, N. S. (2005). Appreciation: Individual differences in finding value and meaning as a unique predictor of subjective well-being. Journal of Personality, 73(1), 79–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00305.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bandalos, D. L., & Finney, S. J. (2010). Factor analysis: Exploratory and confirmatory. In Hancock, G. & Mueller, R. (Eds.), The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences. (pp. 93–114). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bernabé-Valero, G., García-Alandete, J., & Gallego-Pérez, J. F. (2013). Análisis comparativo de dos modelos del Gratitude Questionnaire-Six Items Form [Comparative analysis of two models of the Gratitude Questionnaire-Six Items Form]. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 45 (2), 279–288. https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.v45i2.811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Caputo, A. (2016). Italian translation and validation of the Gratitude Questionnaire (GQ–6). International Journal of Wellbeing, 6(2), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v6i2.492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, L. H., Chen, M.-Y., Kee, Y. H., & Tsai, Y. M. (2009). Validation of the Gratitude Questionnaire (GQ) in Taiwanese under graduate students. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 655–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-008-9112-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavior sciences. New York, NY: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Davis, D. E., Choe, E., Meyers, J., Wade, N., Varjas, K., Gifford, A. … Everett, L. (2016). Thankful for the little things: A meta-analysis of gratitude interventions. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000107CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Díaz, D., Rodríguez-Carvajal, R., Blanco, A., Moreno-Jiménez, B., Gallardo, I., Valle, C., & van Dierendonck, D. (2006). Spanish adaptation of the Psychological Well-Being Scales. Psicothema, 18(3), 572–577.Google ScholarPubMed
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being. The science of happiness and proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emmons, R. A., & Stern, R. (2013). Gratitude as a psychotherapeutic intervention. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69(8), 846–855. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22020CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Epstein, J., Santo, R. M., & Guillemin, F. (2015). A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68(4), 435–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froh, J. J., Fan, J., Emmons, R. A., Bono, G., Huebner, E. S., & Watkins, P. (2011). Measuring gratitude in youth: Assessing the psychometric properties of adult gratitude scales in children and adolescents. Psychological Assessment, 23(2), 311–324. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021590CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1984). On the meaning of within-factor correlated measurement errors. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(1), 572–580. https://doi.org/10.1086/208993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gudmundsson, E. (2009). Guidelines for translating and adapting psychological instruments. Nordic Psychology, 61(2), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1027/1901-2276.61.2.29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatori, K., & Kodama, M. (2014, February). Development of Japanese version of the Gratitude Questionnaire–6 (J–GQ–6). Paper presented at the 2 nd International Conference on Cognitive and Behavioral Psychology. Singapore, Singapore.Google Scholar
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jans-Beken, L., Lataster, J., Leontjevas, R., & Jacobs, N. (2015). Measuring gratitude: A comparative validation of the Dutch Gratitude Questionnaire (GQ6) and Short Gratitude, Resentment, and Appreciation Test (SGRAT). Psychologica Belgica, 55 (1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.bdCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jøreskog, K. G. (1993) Testing structural equation models. In Bollen, K. A. & Scott Long, J. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp.294–316). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kossakowska, M., & Kwiatek, P. (2014). The Polish adaptation of the Gratitude Questionnaire (GQ–6). Przegląd Psychologiczny, 57, 503–514.Google Scholar
Langer, A. I., Ulloa, V. G., Aguilar-Parra, J. M., Araya-Véliz, C., & Brito, G. (2016). Validation of a Spanish translation of the Gratitude Questionnaire (GQ–6) with a Chilean sample of adults and high schoolers. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 14, 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0450-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, C.-C., & Yeh, Y.-C. (2014). How gratitude influences well-being: A structural equation modeling approach. Social Indicators Research, 118(1), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0424-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCallum, R. C., Roznowski, M., Mar, C. M., & Reith, J. V. (1994). Alternative strategies for cross-validation of covariance structure models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2901_1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519–530. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.3.519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez-Martí, M. L., Avia, M. D., & Hernández-Lloreda, M. J. (2010). The effects of counting blessings on subjective well-being: A gratitude intervention in a Spanish sample. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13(2), 886–896. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600002535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martos, T., Garay, M., & Désfalvi, J. (2014). Introduction and psychometric properties of the Hungarian version of the Gratitude Questionnaire (GQ–6–H). Mentálhigiéné és Pszichoszomatika, 15(3), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1556/Mental.15.2014.3.3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullough, M., Emmons, R., & Tsang, J. (2002). The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 82 (1), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.112CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muñiz, J., Elosua, P., & Hambleton, R. K. (2013). International test commission guidelines for test translation and adaptation: Second edition. Psicothema, 25(2), 151–157.Google ScholarPubMed
Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 164–172. https://doi.org/10.1037//1040-3590.5.2.164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2008). An introduction to Applied Multivariate Analysis. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Reips, U. D., & Birnbaum, M. H. (2011). Behavioral research and data collection via the Internet. In Proctor, R. W. & Vu, K. P. L. (Eds.), The handbook of human factors in web design (pp. 563–585). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvador-Ferrer, C. (2017). The relationship between gratitude and life satisfaction in a sample of Spanish university students: The moderation role of gender. Anales de Psicología, 33(1), 114–119. http://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.33.1.226671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandín, B., Chorot, P., Lostao, L., Joiner, T. E., Santed, M. A., & Valiente, R. (1999). The PANAS scales of positive and negative affect: Factor analytic validation and cross-cultural convergence. Psicothema, 11(1), 37–51.Google Scholar
Vázquez, C., Duque, A., & Hervás, G. (2013). Satisfaction with Life Scale in a representative sample of Spanish adults: Validation and normative data. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 16, E82. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2013.82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, P. C. (2014). Gratitude and the good life: Toward a psychology of appreciation. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, P. C., Woodward, K., Stone, T., & Kolts, R. L. (2003). Gratitude and happiness: Development of a measure of gratitude, and relationships with subjective well-being. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 31(5), 431–451. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2003.31.5.431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, A. M., Froh, J. J., & Geraghty, A. W. (2010). Gratitude and well-being: A review and theoretical integration. Clinical Psychological Review, 30(7), 890–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, A., Joseph, S., & Maltby, J. (2008). Gratitude uniquely predicts satisfaction with life: Incremental validity above the domains and facets of the five factor model. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(1), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.02.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yüksel, A., & Oğuz, D. (2012). Turkish adaptation of the Gratitude Questionnaire. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 46, 199–216.Google Scholar
Zeng, Y., Ling, Y., Huebner, E. S., He, Y., & Lei, X. (2017). The psychometric properties of the 5-item Gratitude Questionnaire in Chinese adolescents. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 24(4), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12372CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed