Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T09:07:44.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of Base Frequency and Affix Productivity in Spanish

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Miguel Lázaro López-Villaseñor
Miguel Lázaro López-Villaseñor*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Castilla la Mancha (Spain)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Miguel Lázaro López-Villaseñor. Facultad de Terapia Ocupacional, Logopedia y Enfermería. Avda. Real fábrica de la seda s/n. 45600 Talavera de la Reina, Toledo (Spain). E-mail: miguel.lazaro@uclm.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this study we present the results of a lexical decision experiment where the variables manipulated are Base frequency and Affix productivity. The results show significant main effects for both variables for the first time in Spanish, as well as for the interaction between the two. However, pair analysis shows that the Base Frequency effect is not significant when the Affix Productivity is low, while the Affix Productivity effect is produced regardless of the Base Frequency. The results for the main effects show a morphological representation in the lexicon, whilst the results of pair comparisons suggest a different representation of stems and affixes in the lexicon. These results support the idea that complex words incorporating unproductive affixes are processed differently from words incorporating productive affixes. The results are finally explained in terms of a hierarchical model of morphological processing.

En este estudio presentamos los resultados de un experimento de decisión léxica en el que se manipulan las variables de Frecuencia de base y de Productividad de los afijos. Los resultados muestran por primera vez en español efectos principales significativos de ambas variables, así como de la interacción de las mismas. Sin embargo, un análisis por pares demuestra que el efecto de Frecuencia de Base no es significativo cuando la productividad de los afijos es baja, sino tan solo cuando la productividad de los afijos es alta. El efecto de Productividad de los afijos se produce, no obstante, de forma independiente a la Frecuencia de la base. Los resultados de los efectos principales demuestran una representación morfológica en el léxico, mientras que los resultados de las comparaciones por pares sugieren una distinta representación en el léxico de lexemas y morfemas. Estos resultados avalan el hecho de que las palabras complejas compuestas de afijos poco productivos sean procesadas de distinta manera que las palabras compuestas por afijos productivos. Los resultados son finalmente explicados a la luz de un modelo jerárquico de procesamiento morfológico.

Keywords

affix productivitybase frequencylemmamorphologyfrecuencia de baselemmamorfologíaproductividad de los afijos
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , July 2012 , pp. 505 - 512
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baayen, H., Feldman, L., & Schreuder, R. (2006) Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 290–313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.03.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertram, R., Baayen, R. H., & Schreuder, R. (2000). Effects of family size for complex words. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 390–405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertram, R., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2000). The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: The role of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26, 489–511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.2.489Google ScholarPubMed
Buttherworth, B. (1983). Lexical representation. In Butterworth, B. (Ed.), Language production (pp. 257–294). London, England: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28, 297–332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(88)90017-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlisle, J., & Katz, C. (2006). Effects of word and morpheme familiarity on reading a derived word. Reading and Writing, 19, 669–693. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-5766-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, N., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. (2000). The morphological family size effect and morphology. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 329–365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duñabeitia, J. A., Laka, I., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2008). Is Milkman a superhero like Batman? Constituent morphological priming in compound words. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 615–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faitelson, S. (1993) Sufijación y derivación sufijal: Sentido y forma. [Suffixation and derivation: Form and meaning] In Varela, S.. (Ed.), La formación de palabras [Word formation] (pp. 131–144). Madrid, Spain: Taurus universitaria.Google Scholar
Ford, M. A., Davis, M. H., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2010). Derivational morphology and base morpheme frequency. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 117–130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, B., & Rastle, K. (2007). Neural correlates of morphological decomposition during visual words recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1983–1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.12.1983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavric, A., Clapp, A., & Rastle, K. (2007). ERP evidence of morphological analysis from orthography: A masked priming study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 866–877. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.5.866CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leinonen, A., Brattico, P., Järvenpää, M., & Krause, C. (2008). Event-related potential (ERP) responses to violations of inflectional and derivational rules of Finnish. Brain Research, 1218, 181–193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2008.04.049CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marslen-Wilson, W., Bozic, M., & Randall, B. (2008). Early decomposition in visual word recognition: Dissociating morphology, form and meaning. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 394–421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960701588004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marslen-wilson, W., Komisarjevsky, L., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.101.1.3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meunier, F., & Longtin, C-M. (2007). Morphological decomposition and semantic integration in word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 457–471. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1997). How complex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 118–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pylkkänen, L., Feintuch, S., Hopkins, E., & Marantz, A. (2004). Neural correlates of the effects on morphological family frequency and family size: An MEG study. Cognition, 91, 35–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.09.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schreuder, R., Burani, C., & Baayen, R. H. (2003). Parsing and semantic opacity. In Assink, E. & Sandra, D. (Eds.), Morphology and the mental lexicon. (pp. 14–49). Dordrecht, The Nether-lands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Sebastián, N., Cuetos, F., Martí, M. A., & Carreiras, M. (2000). LEXESP. Léxico informatizado del español [Lexesp: A Spanish computerized lexical database] Barcelona, Spain: UB.Google Scholar
Taft, M., & Forster, K. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638–647. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80051-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taft, M. (2003). Morphological representation as a correlation between form and meaning. In Assink, E. & Sandra, D. (Eds.), Reading complex words. (pp 113–137). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Kluiber.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 745–765. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02724980343000477CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taft, M., & Nguyen-Hoan, M. (2010). A sticky stick? The locus of morphological representation in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 277–296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01690960903043261CrossRefGoogle Scholar