Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T00:40:00.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early Predictors of Reading in Three Groups of Native Spanish Speakers: Spaniards, Gypsies, and Latin Americans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

Carmen López-Escribano  and
Jesús A. Beltrán
Carmen López-Escribano*
Affiliation:
Universidad Complutense (Spain)
Jesús A. Beltrán
Affiliation:
Universidad Complutense (Spain)
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Carmen López-Escribano. Faculty of Education. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Dpto. de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación. Rector Royo Villanova, s/n 28040 Madrid – SPAIN. Phone: 34 91 3946179. Fax: 34 91 3946134. E-mail: carmenle@edu.ucm.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The main purpose of the study reported here was to examine the early linguistic predictors of reading (e.g., Knowledge About Print, Listening Comprehension, Receptive Vocabulary, Rapid Naming of Objects and Letters, and Phonological Awareness), for a sample of 77 Spaniards, 48 Latinos, and 30 Gypsies kindergartens (mean age = 5 years 9 months) living in Spain. The relative contribution of ethnic background, neighbourhood socioeconomic status (SES), age, and gender was assessed. Findings revealed that ethnic background, neighborhood SES, and age differentially predicted children's pre-literacy skills. The implications of these results for understanding the role played by these demographic and socio-cultural variables in alphabetic literacy acquisition are discussed. The second purpose of this study was to add to the growing literature on the nature of reading challenges in children who are learning to read a transparent orthography-Spanish. Cross-linguistic research between different subtypes of readers will add to understand the impact of language characteristics in reading acquisition. Finally, the present study suggested that early assessment of pre-literacy skills can be a highly effective way to determine the instructional needs of students who are at risk for reading failure before formal reading instruction begins.

El objetivo principal del presente estudio fue examinar los predictores tempranos de la lectura (ej.: conocimiento sobre el material impreso, comprensión oral, vocabulario receptivo, denominación rápida de objetos y letras y conciencia fonológica), en una muestra de niños de educación infantil (edad media = 5 años y 9 meses), de los cuales 77 eran madrileños, pertenecientes a la cultura mayoritaria, 48 inmigrantes latinos y 30 madrileños de etnia gitana. La contribución relativa a la adquisición lectora del grupo étnico, estatus socioeconómico, edad y género fue evaluada. Los hallazgos revelan que el grupo étnico, estatus socioeconómico y la edad predicen de modo diferente la habilidad prelectora de los niños. Las implicaciones de estos resultados son discutidas. El segundo objetivo de este estudio fue añadir nuevos datos a la creciente literatura sobre los retos que afrontan los niños que aprenden a leer en una ortografía transparente, como es el caso del español. La investigación entre lenguas y diferentes subtipos de lectores hará que comprendamos mejor el impacto que las características de una lengua tiene en la adquisición lectora. Por último, el presente estudio sugiere que el diagnóstico temprano de las habilidades prelectoras, antes de que la instrucción formal de la lectura comience, puede ser muy efectivo para determinar las necesidades de estudiantes que se encuentran en situación de riesgo de padecer dificultades en la lectura.

Keywords

readingliteracypreschoolSpanishminoritylecturaalfabetizacióneducación infantilespañolminorías étnicas
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , May 2009 , pp. 84 - 95
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Asociación de Enseñantes Gitanos [Association of Teachers Serving Gypsies] (2001). La asociación de enseñantes gitanos y la educación para superar desigualdades. [The association of teachers serving gypsies and education to overcome inequality]. Boletín del Centro de Documentación 21/22.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Devescovi, A., & Wulfeck, B. (2001). Psycholinguistics: A cross-language perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 369–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bornstein, M.H., & Bradley, R.H. (2003). Socioeconomic status, parenting, and child development. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. (1985). Rhyme and reason in reading and spelling. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, M.M. (2000). Concepts about print. What have children learned about the way we print language? Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann Education.Google Scholar
Connor, C.M. & Craig, H.K. (2006). African American preschoolers' language, emergent skills, and use of African American English: A complex relation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 771–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, H.K., Connor, C.M., & Washington, J.A. (2003). Early positive predictors of later reading comprehension for African American students: A preliminary examination. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Angiulli, A., Siegel, L.S., & Hertzman, D. (2004). Schooling, socioeconomic context and literacy development. Educational Psychology, 24(6), 867–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Angiulli, A., Siegel, L.S., & Maggi, S. (2004). Literacy instruction, SES, and word-reading achievement in English-language learners and children with English as a first language: A longitudinal study. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 19(4), 202–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, P.F., & van der Leij, A. (2002). Effects of phonological abilities and linguistic comprehension on the development of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 51–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, P.F., & van der Leij, A. (2003). Developmental changes in the manifestation of a phonological deficit in dyslexic children learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defior, S., & Tudela, P. (1994). Effect of phonological training on reading and writing acquisition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, D.K., & Snow, C.E. (1987). Interrelationships among prereading and oral language skills in kindergartners from two social classes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 2, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, E., Blanco, A., Sullaway, M., y Horcajo, J. (2004). Human Rights and Ethnic Attitudes in Spain: The Role of Cognitive, Social Status and Individual Difference Factors. International Journal of Psychology, 39 (2), 106–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, L.M., Padilla, E.R., Lugo, D.E., & Dunn, L.M. (1986). Test de Vocabulario en imágenes PEABODY [Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test]. Minnesota: American Guidance Service, Publishers.Google Scholar
Ehri, L., Nunes, S., Willows, D., Schuster, B.B., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z. & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analyses. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, J. (1970). Eye or the storm (ABC News video) - 26 minutesGoogle Scholar
Enesco, I., Navarro, A., Paradela, I., Guerrero, S. (2005). Stereotypes and beliefs about different ethnic groups in Spain. A study with Spanish and Latin American children living in Madrid. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 26(6), 638–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ensminger, M.E., & Fothergill, K.E. (2003). A decade of measuring SES: what it tells us and where to go from here. In Bornstein, M.H. & Bradley, R.H. (Eds.), Socioeconomic status, parenting and child development (pp. 13–27). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fundación del Secretariado Gitano (2006). Discriminación y Comunidad Gitana. Informe Anual. [Discrimination and Gypsy Community. Annual Report] Retrieved December 1, 2006 from http://www.gitanos.org/publicaciones/discriminacion06/Google Scholar
George, D., and Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th. ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Goswami, U. (2000). Phonological and lexical processes. In Kamil, M.L., Mosenthal, P.B., Pearson, P.D., & Barr, R. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, (Vol. 3, pp. 251–268) Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar
Guzmán, R., & Jiménez, J.E. (2001). Estudio normativo sobre parámetros psicolingüísticos en niños de 6 a 8 años: La familiaridad subjetiva. [Statistical study about psycholinguistic parameters in children from 6 to 8 years old: Word familiarity]. Cognitiva, 13, 153–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jencks, C., & Phillips, M. (1998). The Black-White test score gap. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Jiménez, J. E., & Ortiz, M.R. (2000). Metalinguistic awareness and reading acquisition in the Spanish Language. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 3, 37–46.Google Scholar
Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of fifty-four children from first to fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 437–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzir, T., Shaul, S., Breznitz, Z., & Wolf, M. (2004). The universal and the unique in dyslexia: A cross-linguistic investigation of reading fluency in Hebrew- and English-speaking children with reading disorders. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 739–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, J.R., & Parrila, R.K. (1999). Theory-based prediction of early reading. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 45, 428–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linan-Thompson, S., & Hickman-Davis, P. (2002). Supplemental reading instruction for students at risk for reading disabilities: Improve reading 30 minutes at a time. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 17(4), 242–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manis, F.R., Lindsey, K.A., Bailey, C.E. (2004). Development of reading in grades K-2 in Spanish-speaking English-language learners. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 19(4), 214–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manis, F.R., Seidenberg, M.S., & Doi, L.M. (1999). See Dick RAN: Rapid naming and the longitudinal prediction of reading subskills in first and second graders. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 129–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molfese, V.J., Modglin, A.A., Beswick, J.L., Neamon, J.D., Berg, S.A., Berg, C.J., & Molnar, A. (2006). Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(4), 296–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutter, V., & Snowling, M. (1998). Concurrent and longitudinal predictors of reading. The role of metalinguistic and short-term memory skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 320–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.Google Scholar
Ramey, C.T., & Ramey, SL. (1998). Early intervention and early experience. American Psychologist, 53, 109–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenthal, R. & Jacobson, L. (1992) Pygmalion in the classroom. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
Salinas, J. (2007). Reflections on educational polices for Spanish Gypsies. European Education, 39(1), 32–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, E., & Devine, K. (2001). Residential mobility and youth well-being: Research, policy, and practice issues. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 25, 119–138.Google Scholar
Scarborough, H.S. (1998). Early identification of children at risk for reading disabilities: Phonological awareness and some other promising predictors. In Shapiro, B.K., Capute, A.J., & Shapiro, B. (Eds.), Specific reading disability: A view of the spectrum (pp. 243–274). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Seymour, P.H.K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J.M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Share, D.L., & Stanovich, K.E. (1995). Cognitive processes in early reading development: A model of acquisition and individual differences. Issues in Education: Contributions from Educational Psychology, 1, 1–35.Google Scholar
Snow, C.E., Barnes, W.S., Chandler, J., Goodman, I.F., & Hemphill, L. (1991). Unfulfilled expectations: Home and school influences on literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Snow, C.E., Burns, SM.. & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young students. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K.E. (1986). The Matthews effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K.E., Cunningham, A.E., & Cramer, B.B. (1984). Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: Issues of task comparability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 28, 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabors, P.O., Páez, M.M., López, L. M. (2003). Dual language abilities of bilingual four-year olds: Initial findings from the early childhood study of language and literacy development of Spanish-speaking children. NABE Journal of Research and Practice, Winter, 70–91.Google Scholar
Torgesen, J.K. (1998). Catch them before they fall: Identification and assessment to prevent reading failure in young children. American Educator, 22, 32–39.Google Scholar
Torgesen, J.K., & Burgess, S.R. (1998). Consistency or reading related phonological processes throughout early childhood: Evidence from longitudinal-correlational and instructional studies. In Metsala, J.L. & Ehri, L.C. (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 161–188). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1994). Longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 276–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., Mathes, P.G., Cirino, P.T., Carlson, C.D., Pollard-Durodola, S.D., Cardenas-Hagan, E., Francis, D.J. (2006). Effectiveness of an English Intervention for First-Grade English Language Learners at Risk for Reading Problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(1), 56–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vellutino, F.R., & Scanlon, D.M. (2002). Research for the future: The interactive strategies approach to reading intervention. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 573–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R.K., & Torgesen, J.K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 192–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimmer, H., Mayringer, H. & Landerl, K. (2000). The Double-Deficit Hypothesis and the difficulties in learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 668–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimmer, H., Marynger, H. (2001). Is the reading-rate problem of German dyslexic children caused by slow visual processes? In Wolf, M. (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain. Timonium, Md.: York Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, M., & Denckla, M.B. (2005). RAN/RAS Rapid automatized naming and rapid alternating stimulus tests. Austin, Texas: Pro-ed.Google Scholar
Wolf, M., Pfeil, C., Lotz, R., & Biddle, K. (1994). Towards a more universal understanding of the developmental dyslexia: The contribution of orthographic factors. In Berninger, V.W. (Ed.), The varieties of orthographic knowledge. I.: Theoretical and developmental issues (pp. 137–171). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar