Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T09:40:29.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Women’s Informal Market Work in Massachusetts, 1875–1920

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Nancy Folbre
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Married women’s entrance into the market economy proceeded at a slow but steady pace between 1890 and 1910. That, at least, is the impression given by conventional census measures of the percentage with “gainful occupations,” which practically doubled in both the United States as a whole and in the heavily industrialized state of Massachusetts (see Table 1). This impression is misleading on at least two counts. Declines in self-reporting and enumerator bias may have overstated the increase in married women with gainful occupations. More important, dwindling opportunities for informal market activities, such as industrial homework, provision of services to boarders, and participation in a family farm or enterprise, may have countervailed increases in formal market participation. In Massachusetts, at least, married women’s specialization in non-market domestic labor probably increased.

Type
Special Section: Women and Labor
Information
Social Science History , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , Spring 1993 , pp. 135 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1993 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Edith (1904) “Wage statistics in the twelfth census.” Journal of Political Economy 12 (June): 339-61.Google Scholar
Abbott, Edith (1924) Women in Industry: A Study in American Economic History. New York: D. Appleton.Google Scholar
Abbott, Edith, and Breckinridge, Sophonisba (1906) “Employment of women in industries: Twelfth census statistics.” Journal of Political Economy 14: 461–501.Google Scholar
Abbott, Edith, Breckinridge, Sophonisba, and Davis, Anne S. (1907). “Women in Manufactures.” Journal of Political Economy, 15: 619-24.Google Scholar
Abel, Marjorie, and Folbre, Nancy (1990) “A methodology for revising estimates: Female market participation in five Massachusetts towns in 1880.” Historical methods 23: 167-76.Google Scholar
Boris, Eileen 1990 Saving the Home from the Factory: Industrial Homework and Its Regulation in the United States, 1880s to 1990s. Forthcoming, Department of History, Howard University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Bose, Christine (1987) “Devaluing women’s work: The undercount of women’s employment in 1900,” in Bose, Christine, Feldberg, Roslyn, and Sokoloff, Natalie (eds.) Hidden Aspects of Women’s Work. New York: Praeger: 95–115.Google Scholar
Ciancanelli, Penelope (1983) “Women’s transition to wage labor: A critique of labor force statistics and reestimation of the labor force participation of married women in the United States, 1900-1930.” Ph.D. diss., New School for Social Research.Google Scholar
Costin, Lela B. (1983) Two Sisters for Social Justice: A Biography of Grace and Edith Abbott. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Craig, Lee A. (1991) “The value of household labor in antebellum northern agriculture.” Journal of Economic History 51: 67–81.Google Scholar
Cross, Gary, and Shergold, Peter R. (1986) “The family economy and the market: wages and residence of Pennsylvania women in the 1890s.” Journal of Family History 11: 245-65.Google Scholar
Dublin, Thomas (1985) “Women and outwork in a nineteenth-century New England town,” in Hahn, Stephen and Prude, Jonathan (eds.) The Countryside in an Age of Capitalist Transformation: Essays in the Social History of Rural America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press: 51–69.Google Scholar
Folbre, Nancy (1991a) “The unproductive housewife: Her evolution in 19th century economics thought.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 16: 463-84.Google Scholar
Folbre, Nancy (1991b) “To market, to market, or not? Married women and market work in Massachusetts, 1880-1910.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Folbre, Nancy, and Abel, Marjorie (1989) “Women’s work and women’s households: Gender bias in the U.S. Census.” Social Research 56: 545-69.Google Scholar
Fraundorf, Martha Norby (1979) “The labor force participation of turn-of-the-century married women.” Journal of Economic History 30: 401-17.Google Scholar
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins (1966) Women and Economics. New York: Harper Torchbacks.Google Scholar
Goldin, Claudia (1986) “The female labor force and American economic growth, 1890-1980,” in Engermann, Stanley L. and Gallman, Robert E. (eds.) Long-Term Factors in American Economic Growth, National Bureau of Economic Research, Studies in Income and Wealth 51: 557–604.Google Scholar
Goldin, Claudia (1990) Understanding the Gender Gap. An Economic History of Ameri can Women. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Joseph (1929) Women in Gainful Occupations, 1870-1920. Census Monographs IX. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Jensen, Joan (1980) “Cloth, butter and boarders: Women’s household production.” Review of Radical Political Economics 12: 14–36.Google Scholar
Jensen, Joan (1986) Loosening the Bonds: Mid-Atlantic Farm Women, 1750-1850. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kessler-Harris, Alice (1990) A Woman’s Wage: Historical Meanings and Social Consequences. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Keyssar, Alexander (1986) Out of Work: The First Century of Unemployment in Massachusetts. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mason, Karen Openheim, Vinovkis, Maris A., and Hareven, Tamara K. (1978) “Women’s work and the life course in Essex County, Massachusetts: 1880,” in Hareven, Tamara (ed.) Transitions: The Family and Life Course in Historical Perspective. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Massachusetts Bureau of the Statistics of Labor (1887) “The unemployed,” Eighteenth Annual Report (December). Boston: Wright and Potter: 1–294.Google Scholar
Massachusetts Bureau of the Statistics of Labor (1914) Industrial Homework in Massachusetts: The Results of an Inquiry Made in Cooperation with the Women’s Education and Industrial Union Department of Research, Forty-fifth Annual Report on the Statistics of Labor for the Year 1914. Boston: Wright and Potter.Google Scholar
Massachusetts Census (1877) The Census of Massachusetts, 1875. Boston: Wright and Potter.Google Scholar
Massachusetts Census (1886) The Census of Massachusetts, 1885. Boston: Wright and Potter.Google Scholar
Massachusetts Census (1896) The Census of Massachusetts, 1895. Boston: Wright and Potter.Google Scholar
Massachusetts Census (1906) The Census of Massachusetts, 1905. Boston: Wright and Potter.Google Scholar
May, Martha (1985) “Bread before roses: American workingmen, labor unions and the family wage,” in Milkman, Ruth (ed.) Women, Work and Protest: A Century of U.S. Women’s Labor History. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul: 1–21.Google Scholar
Modell, John, and Hareven, Tamara (1977) “Urbanization and the malleable household: An examination of boarding and lodging in American families,” in Hareven, Tamara (ed.) Family and Kin in Urban Communities, 1700-1930. New York: New Viewpoints.Google Scholar
Pabst, Margaret (1941) Agricultural Trends in the Connecticut Valley Region of Massachusetts, 1800-1900. Northampton, MA: Smith College Studies in History.Google Scholar
Peel, Mark (1986) “On the margins: Lodgers and boarders in Boston, 1860-1900.” Journal of American History 72: 813–34.Google Scholar
Pigeon, Mary Elizabeth (1936) “The employed woman homemaker in the United States: Her responsibility for family support.” Women’s Bureau Bulletin No. 148. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Report of the Commissioner of Labor (1904) Eighteenth, 1903. Cost of Living and Retail Prices of Food. 58th Congress, 2nd session, House of Representatives. Document 747. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Rotella, Elyce J. (1980) “Women’s labor force participation and the decline of the family economy in the United States.” Explorations in Economic History 17: 95–117.Google Scholar
Rotella, Elyce J. (1977) From Home to Office: U.S. Women at Work, 1879-1930. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Research Press.Google Scholar
Smuts, Robert (1960) Women and Work in America. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Sumner, Helen (1910) “History of women in industry in the United States,” Volume 9 of U.S. Senate Report on the Condition of Woman and Child Wage-Earners in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Census, U.S. (1872) The Statistics of Wealth and Industry of the United States, 1870. Ninth Census, Vol. 3. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Census, U.S. (1883) Census of Population, 1880. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Census, U.S. (1883) Census of 1880. Statistics of Manufactures. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Census, U.S. (1893a) Report on Manufacturing Industries in the U.S. at the Eleventh Census, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Census, U.S. (1893b) Census of Population, 1890. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Census, U.S. (1907) Statistics of Women at Work. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Census, U.S. (1923) Abstract of the 14th Census, 1920. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Census, U.S. (1940) Population. Vol. 4, Characteristics by Ages. Part 1: U.S. Sum mary; Part 3, Maine-Dakota. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Census, U.S. (1903a) Census of Population, 1900. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Census, U.S. (1903b) Manufactures, Reports by States, with Statistics for Principal Cities, 1900. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Census, U.S. (1979) Twenty Censuses: Population and Housing Questions 1790-1950. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Commissioner of Labor (1889) 4th Annual Report, Working Women in Large Cities. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Labor (1925) “Family Status of Breadwinning Women in Four Selected Cities,” in Women’s Bureau Bulletin No. 41. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Wadlin, Horace (1892) “The sweating system in Massachusetts.” Journal of Social Science 30: 86–102.Google Scholar
Wagman, Barnet, and Folbre, Nancy (1992) “Household services and economic growth in the United States, 1870-1930.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar