Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T00:49:58.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Voter Turnout, Critical Elections, and the New Deal Realignment*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

David F. Prindle
David F. Prindle*
Affiliation:
Department of Government University of Texas at Austin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The purpose of this article is to add critical expansion and empirical correction to the thinking about critical elections in American history in general and the New Deal realignment in particular. There will be first a discussion of critical realignment theory, in which some of its ambiguities with regard to the relationship of voting turnout to realignment will be explored. Next, some propositions derived from this literature will be tested in an effort to correct the theory and eliminate the ambiguities. Aggregate data from presidential and congressional elections, 1912-1940, in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, and the city of Pittsburgh, will be employed in this effort.

In general, it will be argued that, when fluctuations in turnout are taken into account, the electoral changes preceding 1940 are at least as correctly described by the term “mobilization” as by the term “realignment.” Finally, some observations will be offered on the future of critical election theory.

Type
Research Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , Winter 1979 , pp. 144 - 170
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1979 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This article would not have been possible without the constructive criticism and encouragement of Walter Dean Burnham, Roy Feldman, Martha Weinberg, and the late Jeffrey Pressman.

References

Andrews, W.G. (1966) “American Voting Participation.” Western Political Quarterly 19.Google Scholar
Blalock, H.M. Jr. (1972) Social Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Burnham, W.D. (1965) “The Changing Shape of the American Political Universe.” American Political Science Review 59 (March): 7–28.Google Scholar
Burnham, W.D. (1970) Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Burnham, W.D. (1974) “Voter Participation in Presidential Elections, by State, 1824–1968,” in “Government: Elections and Politics,” Series Y, 1–271, Historical Statistics of the United States, United States Census, Part 2.Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., Miller, W.E., and Stokes, D.E. (1964) The American Voter. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. (1971) “A Classification of the Presidential Elections,” pp. 105–121 in Clubb, J. M. and Allen, H.W. (eds.) Electoral Change and Stability in American Political History. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Clubb, J.M. and Allen, H.W. (1971) “The Cities and the Elections of 1928: Partisan Realignment?” pp. 236–254 in Clubb, and Allen, Electoral Change.Google Scholar
Degler, C.N. (1971) “American Political Parties and the Rise of the City: An Interpretation,” pp. 124–147 in Clubb, and Allen, Electoral Change.Google Scholar
Epstein, L.D. (1956) “Size of Place and the Division of the Two-Party Vote in Wisconsin.” Western Political Quarterly. 10.1177/106591295600900112Google Scholar
Gosnell, H.F. (1942) Grass Roots Politics: National Voting Behavior of Typical States. New York: Russell and Russell.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr. (1971) “A Theory of Critical Elections,” pp. 27–44 in Clubb, and Allen, Electoral Change.Google Scholar
Ladd, E.C. (1970) American Political Parties: Social Change and Citizen Response. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Ladd, E.C. and Hadley, C.D. (1978) Transformations of the American Party System. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Lubell, S. (1965) The Future of American Politics. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
McRae, D. Jr. and Meldrum, J.A. (1971) “Critical Elections in Illinois: 1888–1958,” pp. 46–74 in Clubb, and Allen, Electoral Change.Google Scholar
Phillips, K.P. (1969) The Emerging Republican Majority. New Rochelle, New York: Arlington House.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. and Sprague, J. (1971) “Concepts In Search of Explicit Formation: A Study In Measurement.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 15.Google Scholar
Sellers, C. (1971) “The Equilibrium Cycle in Two-Party Politics,” pp. 149–177 in Clubb, and Allen, Electoral Change.Google Scholar
Shover, J.L. (1971) “Was 1928 a Critical Election in California?” pp. 214–234 in Clubb, and Allen, Electoral Change.Google Scholar
Stave, B.M. (1970) The New Deal and the Last Hurrah. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Sundquist, J.L. (1973) Dynamics of the Party System. Washington, D. C: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar