Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T00:52:07.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Theory and National Culture: The Case of British and American Absolute Idealism, 1860–1900

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

David Watson
David Watson*
Affiliation:
Crewe and Alsager College—Cheshire, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In this essay, taking as a case study the comparative history of the two groups that gave absolute idealism a leading edge in late nineteenth-century intellectual debate in the United States and Great Britain, I attempt to make a contribution to the recent trend toward the use of sophisticated or “difficult” ideas in comparative analysis (see Moore, 1979). My intentions are twofold: (1) to assist in the clarification of how “social theory” is developed, and (2) to provide an outline of how such comparative cultural analysis can be achieved. After a preliminary discussion of the concept of “social theory” and the component parts into which it can be separated, I proceed to identify the two groups in question, locate their philosophical schemes in the development of contemporary thought, and finally, attempt to demonstrate the value of the approach in an analysis of one aspect of their specifically social and political theories.

Type
Research Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , Summer 1981 , pp. 251 - 274
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1981 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

An earlier version of this article was presented at the Ninth World Congress of Sociology in Uppsala, Sweden, in August 1978. Part of the research on which it is based was supported by grants from the Research Committee of Crewe and Alsager College of Higher Education, whose assistance I gratefully acknowledge.

References

Bosanquet, B. (1893) The Civilisation of Christendom and Other Studies. London: Swan, Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. (1919) The Philosophical Theory of the State. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, H. (1924) Bernard Bosanquet: A Short Account of his Life. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Brokmeyer, H. C. (1910) A Mechanic’s Diary. Washington, DC: E. C. Brokmeyer.Google Scholar
Buckham, J. and Stratton, G. (1934) George Holmes Howison, Philosopher and Teacher: A Selection from his Writings with a Biographical Sketch. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Butts, R. F. and Cremin, L. A. (1953) A History of Education in American Culture. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Collini, S. (1976) “Hobhouse, Bosanquet and the state: philosophical idealism and political argument in England 1880–1918.” Past and Present 72 (August): 86–111.Google Scholar
Cremin, L. A. (1961) The Transformation of the School: Progressivism and American Education, 1867–1957. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Cunningham, G. W. (1933) The Idealistic Argument in Recent British and American Philosophy. New York: Century.Google Scholar
Easton, L. D. (1966) Hegel’s First American Followers—The Ohio Hegelians. Athens, OH: Univ. of Ohio Press.Google Scholar
Flower, E. and Murphey, M. G. (1977) A History of Philosophy in America. New York: G. P. Putnam.Google Scholar
Forbes, C. (1930–1931) “The St. Louis school of thought.” Missouri Historical Rev. 25 and 26: 68–77, 83–101, 289–305, 461–473, 609–622.Google Scholar
Freeden, M. (1978) The New Liberalism: An Ideology of Social Reform. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Goetzmann, W. H. (1973) The American Hegelians: An Intellectual Episode in the History of Western America. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Gordon, P. and White, J. (1979) Philosophers as Educational Reformers: The Influence of Idealism on British Educational Thought and Practice. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Green, T. H. (1969) Works of Thomas Hill Green (R. L. Nettleship, ed.). New York: Kraus. (Originally published 1906–1908; in 3 vols.)Google Scholar
Green, T. H. (1969) Prolegomena to Ethics. New York: Kraus. (Originally published 1906)Google Scholar
Harris, W. T. (1867) “Editor’s introduction.” J. of Speculative Philosophy 1: 1–2.Google Scholar
Harris, W.T. (1881) “The church, the state and the school.” North Amer. Rev. 133 (September): 215–227.Google Scholar
Harris, W. T. (1886) “Industrial education in the common schools.” Education 6 (June): 607–611.Google Scholar
Harris, W. T. (1887) “Henry George’s mistake about land.” Forum 3 (July): 435–442.Google Scholar
Harris, W. T. (1889) “Edward Bellamy’s vision.” Forum 8 (October): 199–208.Google Scholar
Harris, W. T. (1890) Hegel’s Logic: A Book on the Genesis of Categories of the Mind. Chicago: S. C. Griggs.Google Scholar
Harris, W. T. (1897) “Statistics versus socialism.” Forum 14 (October): 186–199.Google Scholar
Harris, W. T. (1898a) Psychologic Foundations of Education: An Attempt to Show the Genesis of Higher Faculties of the Mind. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.Google Scholar
Harris, W. T. (1898b) “Is there work enough for all?” Forum 25 (April): 224–236.Google Scholar
Harris, W. T. (1898c) “The use of higher education.” Educ. Rev. 16 (September): 147–161.Google Scholar
Harris, W. T. (1905) “Social culture as the form of education and religion.” Educ. Rev. 29 (January): 18–37.Google Scholar
Harvie, C. (1976) The Lights of Liberalism: University Liberals and the Challenge of Democracy, 1860–1886. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Howison, G. H. (1901) The Limits of Evolution and Other Essays Illustrating the Metaphysical Theory of Personal Idealism. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kinzer, J. R. (1940) A Study of the Educational Philosophy of William Torrey Harris, with Reference to the Education of Teachers. Nashville: George Peabody College for Teachers.Google Scholar
Knight, W. (1907) Memorials of Thomas Davidson, the Wandering Scholar. Boston: Xerox.Google Scholar
Kuklick, B. (1972) Josiah Royce: An Intellectual Biography. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Kuklick, B. (1977) The Rise of American Philosophy: Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1860–1930. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Leidecker, K. F. (1935) “Harris’theory of culture and civilization.” Int. Educ. Rev. 4: 266–278.Google Scholar
Leidecker, K. F. (1946) Yankee Teacher: The Life of William Torrey Harris. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Mccluskey, N. G. (1958) Public Schools and Moral Education: The Influence of Horace Mann, William Torrey Harris and John Dewey. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1903) “The refutation of idealism.” Mind new series 12: 433–453.Google Scholar
Moore, J. R. (1979) The Post-Darwinian Controversies: A Study of the Protestant Struggle to Come to Terms with Darwin in Great Britain and America, 1870–1900. Cambridge, Eng.; Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Muirhead, J. H. (1908) The Service of the State: Four Lectures on the Political Teaching of T. H. Green. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Muirhead, J. H. (1931) The Platonic Tradition in Anglo-Saxon Philosophy: Studies in the History of Idealism in England and America. London.Google Scholar
Murphey, M. G. (1968) “Kant’s children: the Cambridge pragmatists.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 4: 3–33.Google Scholar
Murphey, M. G. (1973) Our Knowledge of the Historical Past. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Pochmann, A. (1957) German Culture in America: Philosophical and Literary Influences. Madison, WI: Univ. of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Quinton, A. (1971) “Absolute idealism.” Proceedings of British Academy 57: 303–329.Google Scholar
Reck, A. J. (1975) “Idealism in American Philosophy Since 1900,” in Howie, J. and Burford, T. O. (eds.) Contemporary Studies in Philosophical Idealism. Cape Cod, MA: Claude Stark.Google Scholar
Richter, M. (1964) The Politics of Conscience: Green, T. H. and His Age. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Riedl, J. O. (1973) “The Hegelians of St. Louis, Missouri, and their influence in the United States,” in O’Malley, J. J. et al. (eds.) The Legacy of Hegel: Proceedings of the Marquette Hegel Symposium, The Hague, 1970.Google Scholar
Ritchie, D. G. (1891) Principles of State Interference: Four Essays on the Political Philosophy of Herbert Mill, Spencer J. S. and Green, T. H.. London: Swan, Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
Royce, J. (1885) The Religious Aspect of Philosophy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Russell, B.A.W.(1903) The Principles of Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, H. W. (1963) A History of American Philosophy. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Schuyler, W. (1904) “German philosophy in St. Louis.” Bull, of Washington Univ. Assn. 2 (April): 62–84.Google Scholar
Seth, A. and Haldane, R. B. (eds.) (1883) Essays in Philosophical Criticism. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Snider, D. J. (1910) A Writer of Books in his Genesis. St. Louis: Sigma.Google Scholar
Snider, D. J. (1920) The St. Louis Movement in Philosophy, Literature, Education and Psychology, with Chapters of Autobiography. St. Louis: Sigma.Google Scholar
Stirling, J. H. (1865) The Secret of Hegel: Beingthe Hegelian System in Origin, Principle, Form and Matter. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Taunton Commission (18681) (Royal Commission on the Endowed Schools) Report of the Commissioners.Google Scholar
Troen, S. K. (1975) The Public and the Schools: Shaping the St. Louis System, 1838–1920. Columbia, MO: Univ. of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
Watson, D. J. (1975) “Idealism and social theory: a comparative study of British and American adaptations of Hegel, 1860–1914.” Ph.D. dissertation. University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Watson, D. J. (1980) “The neo-Hegelian tradition in America.” J. of Amer. Studies 14 (August).Google Scholar
Wesley, E. B. (1957) NEA, The First Hundred Years:, The Building of the Teaching Profession. New York: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
Wollheim, R. (1959) F. H. Bradley. London: Penguin.Google Scholar