Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T01:20:20.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Post-industrial ‘quality agricultural discourse’: Techniques of governance and resistance in the French debate over GM crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2006

CHAIA HELLER
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Mount Holyoke College, 50 College Street, South Hadlay, MA 01075, USAcheller@mtholyoke.edu
Get access

Abstract

During the 1997–2000 period, the Confédération Paysanne (CP), a union of French family farmers, played a central role in politicizing the French debate over GM crops. This paper is broader than an analysis of the CP's fight against industrial and post-industrial agriculture. It also explores the ways in which French family farmers, disenfranchised for decades from industrial agriculture, have become key figures in defining new notions of agricultural quality in both a national and international context.

While the first part of the paper traces the rise of ‘quality agriculture discourse’ (QAD) as a form of governmentality that normalizes perceived environmental and social issues associated with industrial agriculture, the second half analyzes the way in which the CP utilizes QAD in developing and legitimizing their broader social and agricultural vision and agenda, both within and beyond the context of the French debate over GM crops. As I will illustrate, while the CP establishes GM crops as the symbol of industrialized and ‘place-less’ agriculture, they establish ‘quality’ as the symbol of agricultural place-attachment. By studying the CP's anti-GMO campaign, we may better appreciate the ways in which disenfranchised groups of family farmers are appropriating techniques of governance to promote their own post-industrial agendas.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to thank Arturo Escobar, Rick Fantasia, and Les Levidow whose insights greatly informed many of the thoughts articulated here. Special thanks goes to the National Science Foundation, which made my research in France possible. Also, great thanks to Bruno Latour and Michel Callon at the Centre de Sociologie de l'Innovation for an important year of intellectual support and guidance. My deepest gratitude goes to the many members of the Confédération Paysanne who generously welcomed me into their homes, farms, and offices as I tried to put the pieces together.