1. Stender-Petersen, A., “Gogol und die deutsche Romantik,” Euphorion 24, no. 3 (1922): 628–53Google Scholar; Vinogradov, V. V., “Evoliutsiia russkogo naturalizma,” in his Poetika russkoi literatury (Moscow:Nauka, 1976), pp. 5–187 Google Scholar; Mann, Iu. V, “Evoliutsiia gogolevskoi fantastiki,” in K istorii russkogo romantizma, ed. Mann, Iu. V. et al. (Moscow: Nauka, 1973), pp. 219–58.Google Scholar

2. Shevyrev, S. P., “Kritika. Pokhozhdeniia Chichikova, ili Mertvye dushi. Poema Nikolaia Gogolia.Stat'ia vtoraia,” Moskvitianin 8 (1842): 375–76.Google Scholar

3. Rozov, V A., “Traditsionnye tipy malorusskogo teatra XVII-XVIII vv. i iunosheskie povesti N. V Gogolia,” in Pamiati Gogolia (Kiev, 1911), pp. 99–169 Google Scholar; Gippius, Vasilii, Gogol (Leningrad:Mysl', 1924)Google Scholar.

4. Belyi, Andrei, Masterstvo Gogolia (Moscow: Khudozhestvennaia Literatura, 1934), p. 8.Google Scholar

5. Chizhevskii, Dmitrii, “Neizvestnyi Gogol',” Novyi zhumal 27 (1951): 150.Google Scholar

6. Siniavskii, Andrei, V teni Gogolia (London: Overseas Publications Interchange, 1975),pp. 349–50Google Scholar.

7. See Turbin, V. N., Pushkin. Gogol'. Lermontov (Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1978).Google Scholar

8. Morozov, A. A., “Izvechnaia konstanta ili istoricheskii stil'?,” Russkaia literatura 3 (1979):86.Google Scholar

9. A detailed historical survey of the term and of the concept of the baroque can be found in Wellek's, René Concepts of Criticism (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1963)Google Scholar in two chaptersof the book: “The Concept of Baroque” and “Postscript 1962.” For the historical backgroundof the baroque epoch and characteristic traits of baroque culture, see Segel, Harold B., The Baroque Poem (New York: Dutton, 1974).Google Scholar

10. See Pavlutskii, G., “Barokko Ukrainy,” in Istoriia russkogo iskusstva, ed., Grabar’, Igor’ (6 vols.; Moscow: I. Knebel', 1910–1914), 2:339–40.Google Scholar

11. Zolotusskii, Igor’, Gogol’ (Moscow: Molodaia Gvardiia, 1979), p. 12.Google Scholar

12. See Vadym Shcherbakivs'kyi, “Materiialy do istorii ukrains'koho mystetstva (Ikonostastserkvy het'mana Danyla Apostola v s. Sorochyntsiakh),” Pratsy Ukrains'koho Istorychno-Filolohichnoho Tovarystva v Prazi 5 (1944): 47–70.

13. Annenkov, P. V, Vospominaniia i kriticheskie ocherki (3 vols.; St. Petersburg, 1877–1881)1:186 Google Scholar. All translations are mine.

14. See Ohloblyn, Oleksander, “Ancestry of Mykola Gogol (Hohol),” The Annals of the Ukrainian Academy of Arts and Sciences in the United States 12, no. 1–2 (1969–1972): 12–16.Google Scholar

15. Ibid., p. 32. Gogol’ included a letter, written by the hetman Ivan Skoropadskii in 1711, in his Kniga vsiakoi vsiachiny Hi podruchnaia entsiklopediia. See Gogol', Nikolai, Polnoe sobranie sochinenii (14 vols.; Moscow: AN SSSR, 1937–1952), 9:504 Google Scholar. All references to Gogol “s works are tothis edition; references within the text are to volume and page of this edition.

16. Ohloblyn, “Ancestry of Mykola Gogol (Hohol),” pp. 10–40 passim; Modzalevskii, V. L.,Malorossiiskii rodoslovnik, (3 vols.; Kiev, 1908–1912), 1:292–95 and 3:102–106.Google Scholar

17. Sydorenko, Alexander, The Kievan Academy in the Seventeenth Century (Ottawa, Canada:University of Ottawa Press, 1977), p. 1.Google Scholar

18. The fact that V. A. Gogol’ studied in the Poltava Seminary is mentioned by Ohoblyn, “Ancestry of Mykola Gogol (Hohol),” p. 35. For the effect of the baroque on instruction in the Ukrainian Orthodox educational institutions of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, see Lewin, Paulina, “Barokko v literaturno-esteticheskom soznanii prepodavatelei i slushatelei russkikh dukhovnykhuchilishch XVIII veka,” Wiener Slavistisches Jahrbuch 23 (1977): 180–98.Google Scholar

19. Bezushko, Volodymyr, Mykola Hohol’ (Winnipeg, Man.: Kul'tura i osvita, 1956), p. 93.Google Scholar

20. Ohloblyn, “Ancestry of Mykola Gogol (Hohol),” pp. 29–30.

21. “K stoletnemu iubileiu N. V. Gogolia,” Trudy Kievskoi Dukhovnoi Akademii 50 (June1909): 328.

22. For Orlai's list, see M. Speranskiy ed., Gogolevskii sbornik (Kiev, 1902), p. 336.Google Scholar

23. Nikol'skii, A. S., Osnovaniia rossiiskoi slovesnosti (2 vols.; St. Petersburg, 1809).Google Scholar

24. Sobranie obraztsovykh russkikh sochinenii i perevodov v stikhakh i proze (12 vols.;St. Petersburg: Obshchestvo liubitelei otechestvennoi slovestnosti, 1821–1824).

25. Tolmachev, Iakov, Pravila slovesnosti (4 vols.; St. Petersburg, 1815–1822).Google Scholar

26. Iosif Sreznevskii, “Opyt kratkoi ritoriki,” in Sobranie obraztsovykh russkikh sochinenii i perevodov v proze, 6:clix; and Tolmachev, Pravila slovesnosti, 2:307.

27. Sreznevskii, “Opyt kratkoi ritoriki,” 3:xcvi-ciii; and Tolmachev, Pravila slovesnosti, 3:157.

28. Sreznevskii, “Opyt rossiiskoi piitiki,” Sobranie obraztsovykh russkikh sochinenii iperevodov v stikhakh, l:xlvii.

29. Nikol'skii, Osnovaniia rossiiskoi slovesnosti, 2:116. Gogol “s knowledge of the genre of emblemis confirmed in his correspondence. In a letter to his mother on 18 December 1835, he wrote: “On this occasion, I have enclosed vegetable seeds: incidentally, this is appropriate for the NewYear. It is an emblem and a device and also a wish that you will sow a lot of good things at thebeginning of the year and, at the same time, that you will lead a joyful and happy life, which willlast henceforth forevermore.” See 10:379.

30. Sreznevskii, “Opyt kratkoi ritoriki,” in Sobranie obraztsovykh russkikh sochinenii i perevodov v proze, 1:270–71. For the prominence of these themes in baroque literature, see Segel, The Baroque Poem, pp. 96–97.

31. Tolmachev, Pravila slovesnosti, 1:165.

32. Nikol'skii, Osnovaniia rossiiskoi slovesnosti, 2:37–39.

33. Sreznevskii, “Opyt kratkoi ritoriki,” 2:lxii—lxviii; and Tolmachev, Pravila slovesnosti, 2:293.

34. Sreznevskii, “Opyt rossiiskoi piitiki,” in Sobranie obraztsovykh russkikh sochinenii i perevodov v stikhakh, l:xlviii-xlix.

35. Ibid., l:lxxv-lxxviii.

36. Ibid, lilxxxiii-lxxxvii.

37. Ibid., lxiii.

38. Ibid., lxxxiv-cxxvii.

39. Kachenovskii, M. T., “Vzgliad na uspekhi Rossiiskogo vitiistva v pervoi polovine istekshegostoletiia,” in Sobranie obraztsovykh russkikh sochinenii i perevodov v proze, 1:5–32.Google Scholar

40. See, for example, Sobranie obraztsovykh russkikh sochinenii i perevodov v proze, 1:270–71.

41. See Chizhevskii, , “Das Barock in der russischen Literatur,” Slavische Barockliteratur I, ed.Chizhevskii, D. (Munich: Fink, 1970), pp. 34–36.Google Scholar

42. Sreznevskii, Sobranie obraztsovykh russkikh sochinenii i perevodov v stikhakh, 2:cxcvicxcvii.

43. Kamanin, I. M., “Nauchnye i literaturnye proizvedeniia Nikolaia Gogolia po istorii Malorossii,” in Pamiati Gogolia, ed. Dashkevich, N. P. (Kiev: Istoricheskoe Obshchestvo Nestora-letopistsa, 1902), p. 77.Google Scholar

44. Fedorov, E. Ia., Katalog antikvarnoi biblioteki, priobretennoi posle byvshego ministra D. P. Troshchinskogo (Kiev. 1874), pp. 283, 36 and 76, 208, 2, 13, 25. and 24.Google Scholar

45. See ibid., pp. 42 and 83.

46. Sobranie obraztsovykh russkikh sochinenii iperevodov v proze, 4:22–54, 3–22, 232–74,154–98.

47. For a modern English translation of this travel account, see Adam Olearius, The Travels of Olearius in Seventeenth-Century Russia, trans, and ed. Samuel H. Baron (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1967).

48. Erlich, Victor, Gogol (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1969), p. 161.Google Scholar

49. Gogol’ could already read Italian during his teaching period in St. Petersburg; see DariaBorghese, Gogol a Roma (Florence: Sansoni, 1957), p. 129.

50. Richter, Sigrid, Rom und Gogol': Gogol's Romerlebnis undsein Fragment “Rim” (Hamburg:Hamburg University Press, 1964), p. 66.Google Scholar

51. Siniavskii, V teni Gogolia, p. 347.