Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T06:56:26.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soil seedbed engineering and its impact on germination and establishment in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) as affected by seed–soil contact

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2018

Sebastian Blunk ,
Martine I. de Heer ,
Craig J. Sturrock  and
Sacha J. Mooney
Sebastian Blunk*
Affiliation:
Division of Agriculture and Environmental Science – University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
Martine I. de Heer
Affiliation:
Syngenta Ltd, Bracknell, UK
Craig J. Sturrock
Affiliation:
Division of Agriculture and Environmental Science – University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
Sacha J. Mooney
Affiliation:
Division of Agriculture and Environmental Science – University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Sebastian Blunk, Email: sebastian.blunk@nottingham.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Seed–soil contact plays an essential role in the process of germination as seeds absorb water through direct contact with the moist soil aggregates that surround them. Factors influencing seed–soil contact can be considered as those pertaining to soil physical properties (e.g. texture, bulk density, porosity, etc.) and those related to environmental conditions (e.g. temperature, rainfall, frost). Seed–soil contact is furthermore influenced by the specific field management processes that farmers apply, which have developed significantly over the last 30 years. However, the precise effect of cultivation on the actual contact area of the seed with the surrounding soil is based on a series of assumptions and is still largely unknown. This review considers the influence of soil management and its direct impact on seed–soil contact and establishment. We review the state of the art in methodology for measuring seed–soil contact and assess the potential for soil amendments such as plant residues and waste materials to improve seed–soil contact. Engineering the ‘optimal’ seed–soil contact remains a challenge due to the localized variation between the interaction with field management techniques and soil texture, climatic conditions and crop type. The latest imaging approaches show great promise to assess the impact of management on germination. Combining the techniques with the latest network models offers great potential to improve our ability to accurately predict germination, emergence and establishment.

Keywords

establishmentgerminationmanagementseedbedseed–soil contactsugar beet
Type
Review Paper
Information
Seed Science Research , Volume 28 , Special Issue 3: Seeds as Systems , September 2018 , pp. 236 - 244
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Apostolides, G and Goulas, C (1998) Seed crop environment and processing effects on sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) certified by hybrid variety seed quality. Seed Science and Technology 26, 223–235.Google Scholar
Arvidsson, J, Bölenius, E and Cavalieri, KMV (2012) Effects of compaction during drilling on yield of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). European Journal of Agronomy 39, 44–51.Google Scholar
Atkinson, BS, Sparkes, DL and Mooney, SJ (2007) Using selected soil physical properties of seedbeds to predict crop establishment. Soil Tillage Research 97, 218–228.Google Scholar
Atkinson, BS, Sparkes, DL and Mooney, SJ (2009) Effect of seedbed cultivation and soil macrostructure on the establishment of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Soil Tillage Research 103, 291–301.Google Scholar
Aubertot, J-N et al. (2002) Are penetrometer measurements useful in predicting emergence of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) seedlings through a crust? Plant Soil 241, 177–186.Google Scholar
Aubertot, JN et al. (1999) Characterization of sugar beet seedbed structure. Soil Science Society of America Journal 63, 1377–1384.Google Scholar
BBRO (2017) BBRO Sugar Beet Reference Book. Available at: https://bbro.co.uk/publications/reference-book/Google Scholar
Bewley, JD (1997) Seed germination and dormancy. Plant Cell 9, 1055–1066.Google Scholar
Bewley, JD and Black, M (1994) Seeds: Physiology of Development and Germination. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Blunk, S et al. (2017) Quantification of seed–soil contact of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) using X-ray computed tomography. Plant Methods 13, 71.Google Scholar
Boiffin, J (1986) Stages and time-dependency of soil crusting in situ, pp. 91–98 in Callebaut, DF and de Boodt, GM (eds), Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Assessment of Soil Surface Sealing and Crusting.Google Scholar
Boiffin, J et al. (1994) Modelling sugar beet seedling emergence and early growth, pp. 1143–1148 in Jensen, SHE, Schjnning, P and Madsen, MK (eds), 13th ISTRO Conference, Aalborg, Denmark.Google Scholar
Boiffin, J et al. (1992) Analysis of the variability of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) growth during the early stages. I. Influence of various conditions on crop establishment. Agronomie 12, 515–525.Google Scholar
Børresen, T and Njoes, A (1990) The effects of three tillage systems combined with different compaction and mulching treatments on soil temperature and soil thermal properties. Norwegian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 4, 363–371.Google Scholar
Bouaziz, A and Bruckler, L (1988) Modelling wheat seedling growth and emergence: II. Comparison with field experiments. Soil Science Society of America Journal 53, 1838–1846.Google Scholar
Braunack, MV (1995) Effect of aggregate size and soil water content on emergence of soybean (Glycine max, L. Merr.) and maize (Zea mays, L.). Soil Tillage Research 33, 149–161.Google Scholar
Braunack, M and Dexter, A (1989) Soil aggregation in the seedbed: a review. II. Effect of aggregate sizes on plant growth. Soil Tillage Research 14, 281–298.Google Scholar
Brereton, JC, McGowan, M and Dawkins, TCK (1986) The sensitivity of barley, field beans and sugar beet to soil compaction. Field Crop Research 13, 223–237.Google Scholar
Bresson, L-M and Boiffin, J (1990) Morphological characterization of soil crust development stages on an experimental field. Geoderma 47, 301–325.Google Scholar
Brown, AD et al. (1996) Effect of soil macroporosity and aggregate size on seed–soil contact. Soil Tillage Research 38, 203–216.Google Scholar
Bruckler, L (1983) Rôle des propriétés physiques du lit de semences sur l'imbibition et la germination. I. Élaboration d'un modèle du système ‘terre-graine’. Agronomie 3, 213–222.Google Scholar
Cane, TL (2015) Strip tilling and planting sugar beets into established alfalfa. Journal of Sugar Beet Research 52, 92.Google Scholar
Carson, WP and Peterson, CJ (1990) The role of litter in an old-field community – impact of litter quantity in different seasons on plant species richness and abundance. Oecologia 85, 8–13.Google Scholar
Chambers, JC (2000) Seed movements and seedling fates in disturbed sagebrush steppe ecosystems – implications for restoration. Ecological Applications 10, 1400–1413.Google Scholar
Collis-George, N and Hector, J (1966) Germination of seeds as influenced by matric potential and by area of contact between seed and soil water. Australian Journal of Soil Research 4, 145–164.Google Scholar
Daughtry, CST et al. (2006) Remote sensing of crop residue cover and soil tillage intensity. Soil Tillage Research 91, 101–108.Google Scholar
Degens, BP (1997) Macro-aggregation of soils by biological bonding and binding mechanisms and the factors affecting these: a review. Australian Journal of Soil Research 35, 431.Google Scholar
De Louvigny, N et al. (2002) Emergence of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) from seedbeds after glass waste deposition on soil. Soil Tillage Research 66, 35–46.Google Scholar
de Wit, CT (1953) A physical theory on placement of fertilizers. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Dexter, AR (1991) Statistical structure of tilled soil as determined by image analysis of sections. Div. Note DN 1609, AFRC Institute of Engineering Research, Silsoe, Bedford, UK.Google Scholar
Dürr, C and Aubertot, J-N (2000) Emergence of seedlings of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) as affected by the size, roughness and position of aggregates in the seedbed. Plant Soil 219, 211–220.Google Scholar
Dürr, C et al. (1992) Analysis of the variability of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) growth during the early stages. II. Factors influencing seedling size in field conditions. Agronomie 12, 527–535.Google Scholar
Dürr, C et al. (2001) SIMPLE: a model for SIMulation of PLant Emergence predicting the effects of soil tillage and sowing operations. Soil Science Society of America Journal 65, 414–423.Google Scholar
Durrant, MJ et al. (1988) A census of seedling establishment in sugar-beet crops. Annals of Applied Biology 113, 327–345.Google Scholar
Durrant, MJ and Mash, SJ (1991) Sugar-beet seed steep treatments to improve germination under cold, wet conditions. Plant Growth Regulation 10, 45–55.Google Scholar
Duval, Y and Boiffin, J (1994) Daily emergence disturbance index for sugar beet based on soil crusting, pp. 633–638 in Jensen, SHE, Schjnning, P and Madsen, MK (eds), 13th ISTRO Conference, Aalborg, Denmark.Google Scholar
Ecclestone, P (2004) To plough or not to plough. British Sugar Beet Review 72, 7–9.Google Scholar
Evans, RA and Young, JA (1970) Plant litter and establishment of alien weed species in rangeland communities. Weed Science 19, 697–702.Google Scholar
Evans, RG, Stevens, WB and Iversen, WM (2010) Development of strip tillage on sprinkler irrigated sugarbeet. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 26, 59–69.Google Scholar
FAOSTAT (2018) Sugar beet production world (total). Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC (Accessed: 10 May 2018).Google Scholar
Ferraris, R (1992) Seedbed factors affecting establishment of summer crops in a Vertisol. Soil Tillage Research 23, 1–25.Google Scholar
Fowler, NL (1986) Microsite requirements for germination and establishment of three grass species. American Midland Naturalist 115, 131–145.Google Scholar
Guérif, M and Duke, C (1998) Calibration of the SUCROS emergence and early growth module for sugar beet using optical remote sensing data assimilation. European Journal of Agronomy 9, 127–136.Google Scholar
Gummerson, RJ (1986) The effect of constant temperatures and osmotic potentials on the germination of sugar beet. Journal of Experimental Botany 37, 729–741.Google Scholar
Gummerson, RJ (1989) Seed-bed cultivations and sugar-beet seedling emergence. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 112, 159–169.Google Scholar
Hadas, A and Russo, D (1974a) Water uptake by seeds as affected by water stress, capillary conductivity and seed soil contact. I. Experimental study. Agronomy Journal 66, 643–647.Google Scholar
Hadas, A and Russo, D (1974b) Water uptake by seeds as affected by water stress, capillary conductivity and seed soil contact. II. Analysis of experimental data. Agronomy Journal 66, 647–652.Google Scholar
Håkansson, I et al. (2012) Effects of seedbed properties on crop emergence. 4. Inhibitory effects of oxygen deficiency. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B – Soil and Plant Science 62, 166–171.Google Scholar
Håkansson, I, Myrbeck, Å and Etana, A (2002) A review of research on seedbed preparation for small grains in Sweden. Soil Tillage Research 64, 23–40.Google Scholar
Håkansson, I et al. (2011) Effects of seedbed properties on crop emergence: 3. Effects of firming of seedbeds with various sowing depths and water contents. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B – Soil and Plant Science 61, 701–710.Google Scholar
Halvorson, AD and Hartman, G (1984) Reduced seedbed tillage effects on irrigated sugar beet yield and quality. Agronomy Journal 76, 603–607.Google Scholar
Hanse, B et al. (2011) Analysis of soil characteristics, soil management and sugar yield on top and averagely managed farms growing sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in the Netherlands. Soil Tillage Research 117, 61–68.Google Scholar
Hebblethwaite, PD and McGowan, M (1980) The effects of soil compaction on the emergence, growth and yield of sugar beet and peas. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 31, 1131–1142.Google Scholar
HGCA (2002) Establishing Oilseed Rape Using Autocast. Home Grown Cereal Authority, London Topic Sheet No. 59.Google Scholar
Jabro, JD et al. (2014) Crop water productivity of sugarbeet as affected by tillage. Agronomy Journal 106, 2280–2286.Google Scholar
Jaggard, KW (1977) Effects of soil density on yield and fertilizer requirement of sugar beet. American Applied Biology 86, 301–312.Google Scholar
Jensen, T et al. (2016) Fourier and granulometry methods on 3D images of soil surfaces for evaluating soil aggregate size. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 32, 609–615.Google Scholar
Jensen, T et al. (2017) Assessing the effect of the seedbed cultivator leveling tines on soil surface properties using laser range scanners. Soil Tillage Research 167, 54–60.Google Scholar
Karlen, DL et al. (1994) Crop residue effects on soil quality following 10-years of no-till corn. Soil Tillage Research 31, 149–167.Google Scholar
Keller, T, Arvidsson, J and Dexter, AR (2007) Soil structures produced by tillage as affected by soil water content and the physical quality of soil. Soil Tillage Research 92, 45–52.Google Scholar
Kemper, WD and Chepil, WS (1965) Size distribution of aggregates in methods of soil analysis, pp. 499–510 in Black, CA (ed), Methods of Soil Analysis, part 1. Agronomy 9, 499–510.Google Scholar
Khan, AR and Datta, B (1987) Effect of aggregate size on water uptake by peanut seeds. Soil Tillage Research 3, 171–184.Google Scholar
Koch, HJ (2009) Relations between soil structural properties and sugar beet yield on a Luvisol. Pflanzenbauwissenschaften 13, S. 49–59.Google Scholar
Kritz, G (1983) Physical conditions in cereal seedbeds. A sampling investigation in Swedish spring-sown fields. PhD thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
Larney, FJ, Fortune, RA and Collins, JF (1988) Intrinsic soil physical parameters influencing intensity of cultivation procedures for sugar beet seedbed preparation. Soil Tillage Research 12, 253–267.Google Scholar
Laufer, D and Koch, HJ (2017) Growth and yield formation of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) under strip tillage compared to full width tillage on silt loam soil in Central Europe. European Journal of Agronomy 82, 182–189.Google Scholar
Lyles, L and Woodruff, NP (1962) How moisture and tillage affect soil cloddiness for wind erosion control. Agricultural Engineering 43, 150–153.Google Scholar
Manohar, MS and Heydecker, W (1964) Effects of water potential on germination of pea seeds. Nature 202, 22–24.Google Scholar
Marinello, F et al. (2017) Traffic effects on soil compaction and sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) taproot quality parameters. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 15, 1–8.Google Scholar
Moot, DJ et al. (2000) Base temperature and thermal time requirements for germination and emergence of temperate pasture species. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 43, 15–25.Google Scholar
Morris, NL et al. (2009) The effect of wheat straw residue on the emergence and early growth of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) and oilseed rape (Brassica napus). European Journal of Agronomy 30, 151–162.Google Scholar
Nasr, HM and Selles, F (1995) Seedling emergence as influenced by aggregate size, bulk density, and penetration resistance of the seedbed. Soil Tillage Research 34, 61–76.Google Scholar
Ngoya, C, Hensley, D and Murdoch, C (1997) Evaluation of recycled glass and compost as a turfgrass media. Journal of Turfgrass Management 2, 1–14.Google Scholar
Obour, PB et al. (2017) Predicting soil workability and fragmentation in tillage: a review. Soil Use Management 33, 288–298.Google Scholar
Protz, R et al. (1987) Image analysis of soils – present and future. Geoderma 40, 115–125.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, PE and Rohde, CR (1988) Long-term tillage and nitrogen fertilization effects on organic N and C in a semi-arid soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 44, 596–600.Google Scholar
Richard, G and Dürr, C (1997) Conséquences de l’état du profil cultural sur les peuplements végétaux: Réssite de la levée en relation avec l’état du lit de semences, pp. 49–54 in Le travail du sol dans les systèmes mécanisés tropicaux. Presented at Colloque, Montpellier, FRA.Google Scholar
Rinaldi, M et al. (2005) Modelling the effect of soil moisture on germination and emergence of wheat and sugar beet with the minimum number of parameters. Annals of Applied Biology 147, 69–80.Google Scholar
Romaneckas, K et al. (2009) The effect of conservation primary and zero tillage on soil bulk density, water content, sugar beet growth and weed infestation. Agronomy Research 7, 73–86.Google Scholar
Rotundo, JL and Aguiar, MR (2005) Litter effects on plant regeneration in arid lands: a complex balance between seed retention, seed longevity and soil-seed contact. Journal of Ecology 93, 829–838.Google Scholar
Sadeghian, SY and Yavari, N (2004) Effect of water-deficit stress on germination and early seedling growth stage of sugar beet. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 190, 138–144.Google Scholar
Sadeghpour, A et al. (2015) Switchgrass stand density and yield as influenced by seedbed preparation methods in a sandy loam soil. Bioenergy Research 8, 1840–1846.Google Scholar
Schneider, EC and Gupta, SC (1985) Corn emergence as influenced by soil temperature, matric potential and aggregate size distribution. Soil Science Society of America Journal 49, 415–422.Google Scholar
Sedgley, RH (1963) The importance of liquid seed contact during germination of Medicago tribuloides Dew. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14, 646–653.Google Scholar
Sidhu, BS and Beri, V (1989) Effect of crop residue management on the yields of different crops and on soil properties. Biological Wastes 27, 15–27.Google Scholar
Souty, N and Rode, C (1993) Emergence of sugar beet seedlings from under different obstacles. European Journal of Agronomy 2, 213–221.Google Scholar
Spitters, CJT, van Keulen, H and van Kraalingen, DWG (1989) A simple and universal crop growth simulator: SUCROS87, pp. 147–181 in Rabbinge, R, Ward, SA and van Laar, HH (eds), Simulation and systems management in crop protection. Wageningen, Pudoc (Simulation monographs)Google Scholar
Steude, JS, Hopkins, F and Anders, JE (1994) Industrial X-ray computed tomography applied to soil research. In Anderson, SH and Hopmans, JW (eds), Tomography of Soil-Water-Root Processes. SSSA Special Publications, pp. 29–41.Google Scholar
Stevens, WB et al. (2015) Strip tillage and high-efficiency irrigation applied to a sugarbeet–barley rotation. Agronomy Journal 107, 1250–1258.Google Scholar
Tarkalson, DD, Bjorneberg, DL and Moore, A (2016) Effects of tillage system and nitrogen supply on sugarbeet production. Journal of Sugarbeet Research 52, 30–39.Google Scholar
Tisdall, JM (1994) Possible role of soil-microorganisms in aggregation in soils. Plant Soil 159, 115–121.Google Scholar
Trudgill, DL, Squire, GR and Thompson, K (2000) A thermal time basis for comparing the germination requirements of some British herbaceous plants. New Phytologist 145, 107–114.Google Scholar
Utomo, WH and Dexter, AR (1981) Tilth mellowing. Journal of Soil Science 32, 187–201.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, WW, Doran, JW and Power, JF (1986) Corn and soybean yield response to crop residue management under no-tillage production systems. Agronomy Journal 189, 184–189.Google Scholar
Wuest, SB, Albrecht, SL and Skirvin, KW (2000) Crop residue position and interference with wheat seedling development. Soil Tillage Research 55, 175–182.Google Scholar
Zhou, H, Chen, Y and Sadek, MA (2014) Modelling of soil-seed contact using the discrete element method (DEM). Biosystems Engineering 121, 56–66.Google Scholar