Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T10:10:11.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introverted, Extroverted, and Perverted Controversy: Jung Against Freud

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Ora Gruengard
Ora Gruengard
Affiliation:
Tel AvivIsrael
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Like many controversies in science, the one between Freud and Jung is overloaded with ad hominem arguments despite the incompatibility of such arguments with the pretensions of both sides to attain scientific ad rem validity. Unlike natural scientists, Freud and Jung regarded their own ad hominem arguments as relevant to general and impersonal truths. They practically legitimized such a use claiming to have a clinical basis for the rejection of the opponent's objections by a de-validating analysis of the opponent's personality as a whole. The argument of this paper is that the de-validating strategy was neither an inevitable psychological outcome of the intricate interpersonal relationships in analytic situations nor the logical consequence of any clinical or scientific psycho-analytical discovery. It followed from the epistemological invalid pretension to have a general theory of mind which could explain by mental analysis the existence of “unreasonable opinions,” and the application of the same principles to the opinion that the theory itself is unreasonable. Such a pretension, apparently specific to mystical traditions in theology and metaphysics, was deeply rooted in the modern epistemological tradition. The paper examines the impact of the different branches of that tradition on Freud and Jung's respective ideologies, theories, and practice, including the ad hominem malpractice.

Type
Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , Summer 1998 , pp. 255 - 290
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Augustine, Saint. [399] 1961. Confessions. Translated by Pine-Coffin, R.. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Brentano, Franz. [1874] 1973. Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Brown, Peter. 1978. The Making of Late Antiquity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chadwick, Henry. 1986. Augustine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cornford, F. M. [1921] 1967. “Unconscious Element in Literature and Philosophy. In The Unwritten Philosophy and Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. [1900] 1953. The Interpretation of Dreams. Vols. 4–5 of Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, translated and edited by Strachey, James. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. [1905] 1953. Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious. Vol. 8 of Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, translated and edited by Strachey, James. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. [1910] 1953. Five Lectures on Psycho-analysis. Vol. 11 of Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, translated and edited by Strachey, James. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. [1911] 1953. Formulations on Two Principles of Mental Functioning. Vol. 12 of Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, translated and edited by Strachey, James. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. [1912] 1953. A Note on the Unconscious in Psychoanalysis. Vol. 12 of Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, translated and edited by Strachey, James. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. [1912–1913] 1953. Totem and Taboo. Vol. 13 of Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, translated and edited by Strachey, James. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. [1914] 1953. On the History of the Psycho-Analytic Movement. Vol. 14 of Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, translated and edited by Strachey, James. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. [1915] 1953. The Unconscious. Vol. 14 of Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, translated and edited by Strachey, James. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. [1916–1917] 1953. Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Analysis. Vol. 15–16 of Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, translated and edited by Strachey, James. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. [1920] 1953. Beyond the Pleasure Principle. Vol. 18 of Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, translated and edited by Strachey, James. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. [1925] 1953. The Objections to Psycho-Analysis. Vol. 20 of Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, translated and edited by Strachey, James. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. [1939] 1953. Moses and Monotheism. Vol. 23 of Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, translated and edited by Strachey, James. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Gay, Peter. 1988. Freud — A Life for Our Time. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Heine, Heinrich. [1840] 1925. “Boerne.” In Samthiche Werke. Munchen: G. Muller.Google Scholar
Jung, , Carl, J. [1904–1907, rev. 1910] 1985. The Association Method. Vol. 2 of The Collected Works of C. J. Jung, translated by Hull, R. F. C.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jung, , Carl, J. [1911] 1985. “Morton Prince: “The Mechanism and Interpretation of Dreams: A Critical Review” in Freud and Psychoanalysis. Vol. 4 of The Collected Works of C. J. Jung, translated by Hull, R. F. C.,56–77. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jung, , Carl, J. [1912a] 1985. “Concerning Psychoanalysis.” Vol. 4 of The Collected Works of C. J. Jung, translated by Hull, R. F. C., 78–81. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jung, , Carl, J. [1912b] 1985. “The Theory of Psychoanalysis.” Vol. 4 of The Collected Works of C. J. Jung, vol. 4, translated by Hull, R. F. C., 83–216. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jung, , Carl, J. [1913] 1985. “General Aspects of Psychoanalysis.” Vol. 4 of The Collected Works of C. J. Jung, translated by Hull, R. F. C., 229–242. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jung, , Carl, J. [1916] 1985. “Psychoanalysis and Neurosis.” Vol. 4 of The Collected Works of C. J. Jung, translated by Hull, R. F. C., 243–251. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jung, , Carl, J. [1914] 1985. “Some Crucial Points in Psychoanalysis. A Correspondence Between Dr. Jung and Dr. Loy.” Vol. 4 of The Collected Works of C. J. Jung, translated by Hull, R. F. C., 252–289. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jung, , Carl, J. [1916] 1985. “Prefaces to ‘Collected Papers on Analytical Psychology’.” Vol. 4 of The Collected Works of C. J. Jung, translated by Hull, R. F. C., 290–297. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jung, , Carl, J. [1929] 1985. “Freud and Jung: Contrasts.” Vol. 4 of The Collected Works of C. J. Jung, translated by Hull, R. F. C., 333–340. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jung, , Carl, J. [1930] 1985. “Introduction to Kranefeldt's ‘Secret Ways of the Mind’.” Vol. 4 of The Collected Works of C. J. Jung, translated by Hull, R. F. C., 324–332. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jung, , Carl, J. [1942] 1985. “Psychotherapy and a Philosophy of Life.” Vol. 16 of The Collected Works of C. J. Jung, translated by Hull, R. F. C.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jung, , Carl, J. [1949] 1985. “The Significance of the Father in the Destiny of the Individual” (third edition, revised and expanded with a foreword to 1927 edition and a new foreword (first edition 1909)), Vol. 4 of The Collected Works of C. J. Jung, translated by Hull, R. F. C., 301–323. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Walter. 1950. Nietzsche, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 1966. Ecrits, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Locke, John. [1689] 1965. A Letter Concerning Tolerance. London: J. M. Deut.Google Scholar
Locke, John. [1690a] 1964. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. New York: Collier.Google Scholar
Locke, John. [1690b] 1970. Two Treaties on Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John. [1693] 1964. Some Thoughts Concerning Education. London: Heinemann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masson, Jeffrey Moussaieff. 1988. Against Therapy. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1990. Final Analysis. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
McGuire, William, ed. [1974] 1979. The Freud/Jung Letters, abridged edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Neumann, Erich. 1975. “Die psychologischen Stadien der weiblichen Entwicklung” in Zur Psychogie des Weiblichen Umkreisung der Mitte, Vol. 2. München: Kindler Tascheybucher.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. [1886] 1965. Beyond Good and Evil. Translated by Cowan, Maryanne. Chicago: Henry Ragnery.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. [1882–1883] 1961. Thus Spake Zarathustra. Translated by Hollingdale, R. J.. Harmondsworth, , Middlesex: Penguin.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. [1882, 1887] 1974. The Gay Science.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. [1887] 1956. “Towards a Genealogy of Morals.” In The Birth of Tragedy and the Genealogy of Morals. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. [1889] 1968. “Twilight of the Idols. ” In Twilight of the Idols and Anti-Christ, translated by Hollingsdale, R. J.. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. [1901] 1968. The Will to Power. Translated by Kaufmann, Walter and Hollingdale, R. J.. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Noll, Richard. 1994. The Jung Cult — Origins of a Charismatic Movement. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. [1953] 1971. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” Pp. 63–81 in Reading in the Philosophy of Language, edited by Rosenberg, J. and Travis, C.. Engle-wood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Rudnytsky, Peter L. 1994. “Freud and Augustine.” Pp. 128–152 in Freud and the Forbidden Knowledge, edited by Ruduytsky, Peter L. and Handler, Ellen. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. [1844] 1966. The World as Will and Idea, 2nd ed. Translated by Paine, E. F. J.. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1983. Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shakow, D. and Rapaport, D.. 1968. The Influence of Freud on American Psychology. Cleveland: World.Google Scholar
Spence, Donald P. 1982. Narrative Truth and Historical Truth. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Spence, Donald P. 1994. The Rhetorical Voice of Psychoanalysis. Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sulloway, Frank. 1979. Freud: A Biologist of the Mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Varela, Francisco J., Thompson, Evan and Rosch, Eleanor. 1991. The Embodied Mind — Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Yerushalmi, M. H. 1991. Freud's Moses. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar