Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T02:30:25.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Between learned and popular culture: A world of syncretism and acculturation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2022

Nathalie Richard
Nathalie Richard*
Affiliation:
TEMOS, UMR CNRS 9016, Le Mans University, France
*
Email: nathalie.richard@univ-lemans.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The world of charlatans is a world of constantly shifting borders and redefinitions, a world of crossed lines and pushed boundaries. Can one even speak of “the world” of charlatans in the singular, when the examples we are given to read in this volume reveal such great diversity that they seem to defeat any attempt to define common traits, as Roy Porter (1989) tried to do in his time? Certainly, commercial interests and the lure of a quick and easy profit seem to have motivated some charlatans. Certainly, the universal effects of the nostrum or (psycho)therapeutic procedures were often put forward as a commercial argument. Certainly, many had an itinerant career; but this was not always the case. In fact, these traits are not shared, and the main reason is probably that, aside from a very particular context in early modern Italy, the qualification of charlatan was not claimed by the actors themselves, but was attributed to them by others, be they contemporaries or later historians. These features are therefore only common if we understand them as stigmata1 attributed to charlatans by those who wish to distinguish themselves from them or to draw a line between orthodoxy and heterodoxy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 33 , Issue 4: Charlatans , December 2020 , pp. 491 - 495
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bensaude-Vincent, Bernadette, and Christine, Blondel, eds. 2002. Des savants face à l’occulte (1870–1940). Paris: La DécouverteCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cefali, Mireille. 1983. “Théodore Flournoy: La découverte de l’inconscient.” Le Bloc-Notes de la psychanalyse 3:111–131.Google Scholar
Durand (de Gros), Joseph-Pierre. 1894. Le Merveilleux scientifique. Paris : Alcan.Google Scholar
Fages, Volny. 2016. “‘L’affaire Chacornac,’ ascension et stigmatisation d’un astronome d'État.” Gesnerus 73(2):273–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faure, Olivier. 2018. “Le surgissement de médecines révolutionnaires en France (fin XVIIIe-début XIXe siècles) : Magnétisme, phrénologie, acupuncture, homéopathie.” Histoire, médecine, santé 14:29–45.Google Scholar
Forster, Marie A. 1989. “Piété et empirisme: L’enquête épiscopale de La Salette.” In Christianisme et science, Association française d’histoire religieuse contemporaine, 55-75. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Goffman, Ervin. 1963. Stigma : Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Guillemain, Hervé, and Richard, Nathalie. 2016. “Towards a Contemporary Historiography of Amateurs in Science (18th–20th Century).” The Frontiers of Amateur Science (18th-20th Century), special issue, Gesnerus 73 (2):201–237.Google ScholarPubMed
Harris, Ruth. 1999. Lourdes: Body and Spirit in the Secular Age. London: The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Fleur. 2018. “Écrire un ‘conte à structure savante’: Apparition, métamorphoses et déclin du récit merveilleux-scientifique dans l’œuvre de Maurice Renard (1909-1931).” ReS Futurae [online], 11 | 2018, https://doi.org/10.4000/resf.1296 (last accessed date: July 15, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogorzelec, Laetitia. 2014. “L’évolution de l’expertise médicale des guérisons de Lourdes au regard de la ‘conversation de gestes’.” Archives de sciences sociales des religions 166:221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheim, Janet. 1985. The Other World: Spiritualism and Psychical Research in England, 1850-1914. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Plas, Régine. 2000. Naissance d’une science humaine: La psychologie. Les psychologues et “le merveilleux psychique. ” Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Podgorny, Irina. 2015. “A Charlatan’s Album: Cartes-de-visite from Bolivia, Argentina and Paraguay (1860-1880).” In From Dust to Digital: Ten Years of the Endangered Archives Programme , edited by Kominko, Maja, 417–443. Cambridge UK: Open Book Publishers.Google Scholar
Podgorny, Irina. 2017. “Charlatans and Medicine in 19th-Century Latin America.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia: Latin American History, edited by William Beezley. https://oxfordre.com/latinamericanhistory/ (last accessed date, July 15 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Roy. 1989. Health for Sale: Quackery in England 1660–1850. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Redfield, Robert, Ralph, Linton, and Herskovits, Melville J.. 1936. “Memorandum for the Study of Acculturation.” American Anthropologist 38 (1):149–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, Simon, Roberts, Lissa, Raj, Kapil, and Delbourgo, James editors. 2009. The Brokered World: Go-betweens and Global Intelligence, 1770-1820. (Uppsala Studies in History of Science, No. 35). Sagamore Beach: Science History Publications.Google Scholar
Smoller, Laura. 2011. “From Authentic Miracles to a Rhetoric of Authenticity: Examples from the Canonization and Cult of St. Vincent Ferrer.” Church History 80 (4):773–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trochu, Thibaud, 2018. William James: Une autre histoire de la psychologie. Paris: CNRS Édition.Google Scholar
Vidal, Fernando. 2007. “Miracles, Science, and Testimony in Post-Tridentine Saint-Making.” Science in Context 20 (3):481–508.Google Scholar