Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-n6p7q Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-02-25T19:51:54.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modes of Extension: Comments on Kit Fine's ‘In Defence of Three-Dimensionalism’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2008

Extract

The debate between 3- and 4-dimensionalists is one of the most lively and pervasive in current metaphysics. At stake is a glittering prize: the correct metaphysical analysis of material things and other objects commonly thought to persist in time by enduring. Since we count ourselves among such objects the outcome of the debate is of more than merely academic interest to us. Obviously the ramifications of the debate, even of the points raised by Kit Fine, go far beyond what I can discuss here, so I shall simply select some salient issues and comment on them from my own somewhat heterodox point of view.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ingarden, R. 1964. Time and Modes of Being. Springfield, IL: Charles S. Thomas.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. 1922. Der Begriff der Genese in Physik, Biologie und Entwicklungsgeschichte: eine Untersuchung zur vergleichenden Wissenschaftslehre. Berlin: Bornträger/Springer. Reprinted in Kurt-Lewin-Werkausgabe. Vol. 2. Graumann, C.-F. (ed.) Bern/Stuttgart, Huber/Klett-Cotta, 1983.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. 1931. Guess at the Riddle. In C. S. Peirce: The Collected Papers, Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Simons, P. M. 2007. The Thread of Persistence. In Kanzian, C., ed., Persistence. Frankfurt/M: Ontos, 2007, 165184.Google Scholar