Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T00:25:31.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Type synthesis of legged mobile landers with one passive limb using the singularity property

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2018

Rongfu Lin ,
Weizhong Guo ,
Xianbao Chen  and
Meng Li
Rongfu Lin
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Systems and Vibration School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, P. R. China. E-mails: rongfulin@sjtu.edu.cn, xianbao@sjtu.edu.cn, noray@sjtu.edu.cn
Weizhong Guo*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Systems and Vibration School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, P. R. China. E-mails: rongfulin@sjtu.edu.cn, xianbao@sjtu.edu.cn, noray@sjtu.edu.cn
Xianbao Chen
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Systems and Vibration School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, P. R. China. E-mails: rongfulin@sjtu.edu.cn, xianbao@sjtu.edu.cn, noray@sjtu.edu.cn
Meng Li
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Systems and Vibration School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, P. R. China. E-mails: rongfulin@sjtu.edu.cn, xianbao@sjtu.edu.cn, noray@sjtu.edu.cn
*
*Corresponding author: E-mail: wzguo@sjtu.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

During extraterrestrial planetary exploration programs, autonomous robots are deployed using a separate immovable lander and a rover. This mode has some limitations. In this paper, a concept of a novel legged robot with one passive limb and singularity property is introduced that has inbuilt features of a lander and a rover. Currently, studies have focused primarily on a performance analysis of the lander without a walking function. However, a systematic type synthesis of the legged mobile lander has not been studied. In this study, a new approach to the type synthesis used for the robot is proposed based on the Lie group theory. The overall concept and design procedures are proposed and described. The motion requirements of the robot and its legs, which are corresponding to the multi-function, are extracted and described. The layouts of the subgroups or submanifolds of the limbs are determined. The structures of the passive and actuated limbs are synthesized. Numerous structures of the legs with a passive limb are produced and listed corresponding to the desired displacement manifolds. Numerous novel structures of legs for the legged mobile lander are presented and listed. Then, four qualitative criteria or indexes are introduced. Based on the proposed criteria, a leg's configuration is selected as the best. A typical structure of the legged mobile lander is obtained by assembling the structures of the proposed legs. Finally, the typical robot is used as an example to verify the capabilities of the novel robot using a software simulation (ADAMS).

Keywords

Legged mobile landerType synthesisParallel mechanismPassive limbSingularity property
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 36 , Issue 12 , December 2018 , pp. 1836 - 1856
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Donahue, B. B., Caplin, G., Smith, D. B., Behrens, J. W. and Maulsby, C., “Lunar lander concepts for human exploration,” J. Spacecr. Rockets 45, 383–393 (2008).Google Scholar
2. Hapke, B., “Surveyor I and Luna IX pictures and the Lunar soil,” Icarus 6, 254–269 (1967).Google Scholar
3. Williams, R. J. and Gibson, E. K., “The origin and stability of lunar goethite, hematite and magnetite,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 17, 84–88 (1972).Google Scholar
4. Weiss, S. P., “Apollo experience report: Lunar module structural subsystem,” NASA TN D-7084, (NASA Technical Note, 1973).Google Scholar
5. Parkinson, R., “The use of system models in the EuroMoon spacecraft design,” Acta Astronaut. 44, 437–443 (1999).Google Scholar
6. Okada, T., Sasaki, S., Sugihara, T., Saiki, K., Akiyama, H., Ohtake, M., Takeda, H., Hasebe, N., Kobayashi, M., Haruyama, J. and Shirai, K., “Lander and rover exploration on the lunar surface: A study for SELENE-B mission,” Adv. Space Res. 37, 88–92 (2006).Google Scholar
7. Prinzell, L. J. III, Kramer, L. J., Norman, R. M., Arthur, J. J. III, Williams, S. P., Shelton, K. J. and Bailey, R. E., “Synthetic and enhanced vision system for Altair lunar lander,” International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, pp. 660–665 (2009).Google Scholar
8. Wu, W. and Yu, D., “Key technologies in the chang'E-3 soft-landing project,” J. Deep Space Explor. 1, 105–109 (2014).Google Scholar
9. He, P. J. L. Z. Z., “Conceptual design of a lunar lander,” Spacecr. Eng. 1, 006 (2008).Google Scholar
10. Ringrose, T., Towner, M. and Zarnecki, J., “Convective vortices on mars: A reanalysis of Viking lander 2 meteorological data, sols 1–60,” Icarus 163, 78–87 (2003).Google Scholar
11. Heet, T. L., Arvidson, R., Cull, S., Mellon, M. and Seelos, K., “Geomorphic and geologic settings of the Phoenix lander mission landing site,” J. Geophys. Res. Planets 114, E00E04(1–19) (2009).Google Scholar
12. Munjulury, R. C., Berry, P., Coca, D. B., Prat, A. P. and Krus, P., “Analytical weight estimation of landing gear designs,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part G. J. Aerosp. Eng. 231 (12), 2214–2227 (Oct. 2017).Google Scholar
13. Erturk, A., Renno, J. M. and Inman, D. J., “Modeling of piezoelectric energy harvesting from an L-shaped beam-mass structure with an application to UAVs,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 20 (5), 529–544 (2009).Google Scholar
14. Nagendran, A., Crowther, W. and Richardson, R., “Biologically inspired legs for UAV perched landing,” IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag. 27 (2), 4–13 (2012).Google Scholar
15. Iagnemma, K., Shibly, H., Rzepniewski, A., Dubowsky, S. and Territories, P., “Planning and control algorithms for enhanced rough-terrain rover mobility,” Int. Symp. Artif. Intell. Robot. Autom. Space, 2 (2), 1–8 (2001).Google Scholar
16. Lindemann, R., “Mars exploration rover mobility development-mechanical mobility hardware design, development, and testing,” Robot. Autom. Mag. IEEE 13, 19–26 (2006).Google Scholar
17. Chuankai, L., Baofeng, W. and Jia, W., “Integrated INS and vision based orientation determination and positioning of CE-3 lunar rover,” J. Spacecr. TT & C Tech. 33, 250–257 (2014).Google Scholar
18. Bertrand, R., Lamon, P., Michaud, S., Schiele, A. and Siegwart, R., “The Solero Rover for Regional Exploration of Planetary Surfaces,” EGS-AGU-EUG Joint Assembly, (Nice, France, 6–11 April 2003).Google Scholar
19. Estier, T., Crausaz, Y., Merminod, B., Lauria, M., Piguet, R. and Siegwart, R., “An innovative space rover with extended climbing abilities,” Space Robot. 36, 333–339 (2000).Google Scholar
20. Baglioni, P., Elfving, A. and Ravera, F., “The ExoMars rover – overview of phase B1 results,” Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space, Los Angeles, CA, (2008).Google Scholar
21. Wilcox, B. H., “ATHLETE: A Mobility and Manipulation System for the Moon,” Proceedings of the Aerospace Conference, (2007) pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
22. Wilcox, B. H., “ATHLETE: An Option for Mobile Lunar Landers,” Proceedings of the Aerospace Conference, (2008) pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
23. Laird, D., Raptis, I. A. and Price, J., “Design and validation of a centimeter-scale robot collective,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, (2014) pp. 918–923.Google Scholar
24. Available at: https://www.bostondynamics.com/atlasGoogle Scholar
25. Lu, Liang, Zhixian, Zhang, Linli, Guo, Chen, Yang, Yao, Zeng, Min, Li and Peijian, Ye, “Mobile lunar lander crewed lunar exploration missions,” Manned Spacefl. 21 (5), 472–478 (2015).Google Scholar
26. Renzhang, Zhu, Hongfang, Wang and Xiaoguang, Wang, “Advances in the Soviet/Russian EVA spaceflight,” Manned Spacefl. 1 (15) 25–45 (2009).Google Scholar
27. Birkenstaedt, B. M., Hopkins, J., Kutter, B., Zegler, F. and Mosher, T., “Lunar Lander Configurations Incorporating Accessibility, Mobility, and Centaur Cryogenic Propulsion Experience,” Proceedings of the AIAA Space Conference, vol. 7284, pp. 6–9.Google Scholar
28. Guo, W. Z. and Guo, W. T., “Structural design of a novel family of 2-DOF translational parallel robots to enhance the normal-direction stiffness using passive limbs,” Intell. Serv. Robot. 10 (4), 333–346 (2017).Google Scholar
29. Zhang, J., Xu, Z. and Zang, W., “The new method of confirming the dead-point location of the plane lower four-bar linkage,” For. Eng. (2007).Google Scholar
30. Shoham, M. and Roth, B., “Connectivity in open and closed loop robotic mechanisms,” Mech. Mach. Theory 32, 279–293 (1997).Google Scholar
31. Mavroidis, C. and Roth, B., “New and revised overconstrained mechanisms,” Trans. ASME J. Mech. Des. 117, 75–82 (1995).Google Scholar
32. Deng, Zongquan, Yang, Fei and Jianguo, Tao, “Adding sub-chain method for structural synthesis of planar closed kinematic chains,” Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 25, 206–213 (2012).Google Scholar
33. Hervé, J. M., “Analyse structurelle des mécanismes par groupe des déplacements,” Mech. Mach. Theory 13, 437–450 (1978).Google Scholar
34. Li, Q. and Hervé, J. M., “Type synthesis of 3-DOF RPR-equivalent parallel mechanisms,” IEEE Trans. Robot. 30 (6), 1333–1343 (2017).Google Scholar
35. Wu, Y., Li, Z., Ding, H. and Lou, Y., “Quotient kinematics machines: Concept, analysis and synthesis,” Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, (2008) pp. 1964–1969.Google Scholar
36. Gao, F., Li, W., Zhao, X., Jin, Z. and Zhao, H., “New kinematic structures for 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-DOF parallel manipulator designs,” Mech. Mach. Theory 37, 1395–1411 (2002).Google Scholar
37. Jun, H. E., Feng, G., Meng, X. and Guo, W., “Type synthesis for 4-DOF parallel press mechanism using GF set theory,” Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 28, 851–859 (2015).Google Scholar
38. Huang, Z. and Li, Q. C., “General methodology for type synthesis of symmetrical lower-mobility parallel manipulators and several novel manipulators,” Int. J. Robot. Res. 21, 131–146 (2002).Google Scholar
39. Kong, X., “Type synthesis of 3-DOF parallel manipulators with both a planar operation mode and a spatial translational operation mode 1,” J. Mech. Robot. 5, 041015 (2013).Google Scholar
40. Huang, T., Dong, C., Liu, H., Sun, T. and Chetwynd, D. “A simple and visually orientated approach for type synthesis of overconstrained 1T2R parallel mechanisms,” Robotica 1–13 (2018). doi:10.1017/S0263574718000395Google Scholar
41. Zhao, T. S., Dai, J. S. and Huang, Z., “Geometric analysis of overconstrained parallel manipulators with three and four degrees of freedom,” JSME Int. J. 45 730–740 (2002).Google Scholar
42. Lin, R., Guo, W. and Gao, F., “Type synthesis of a family of novel 4-, 5- and 6-DOF sea lion ball mechanisms with three limbs,” J. Mech. Robot. 8, 021023-1-12 (2015).Google Scholar
43. Yang, T. L., Liu, A. X., Jin, Q., Luo, Y. F., Shen, H. P. and Hang, L. B., “Position and orientation characteristic equation for topological design of robot mechanisms,” J. Mech. Des. 131, 021001-1-17 (2009).Google Scholar
44. Kong, X. W. and Gosselin, C., “Type synthesis of 3T1R 4-DOF parallel manipulators based on screw theory,” IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 20, 181–190 (2004).Google Scholar
45. Gogu, G., “Structural synthesis of fully-isotropic translational parallel robots via theory of linear transformations,” Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids 23, 1021–1039 (2004).Google Scholar
46. Xie, F. G., Li, T. M. and Liu, X. J., “Type synthesis of 4-DOF parallel kinematic mechanisms based on Grassmann line geometry and atlas method,” Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 26, 1073–1081 (2013).Google Scholar
47. Fan, C. X., Liu, H. Z. and Zhang, Y. B., “Type synthesis of 2T2R, 1T2R and 2R parallel mechanisms,” Mech. Mach. Theory 61, 184–190 (2013).Google Scholar
48. Yang, P. and Gao, F., “Leg kinematic analysis and prototype experiments of walking-operating multifunctional hexapod robot,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 228, 2217–2232 (2014).Google Scholar
49. Pan, Y. and Gao, F., “A new six-parallel-legged walking robot for drilling holes on the fuselage,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 228, 753–764 (2014).Google Scholar
50. Ye, W., Fang, Y., Zhang, K. and Guo, S., “A new family of reconfigurable parallel mechanisms with diamond kinematotropic chain,” Mech. Mach. Theory 74, 1–9 (2014).Google Scholar