Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:26:09.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kinematic Calibration of Industrial Hydraulic Manipulators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

M. Khoshzaban ,
F. Sassani  and
P. D. Lawrencet
M. Khoshzaban
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of British Columbia, 2324 Main Mall, Vancouver BC V6T 1Z4 (Canada).
F. Sassani
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of British Columbia, 2324 Main Mall, Vancouver BC V6T 1Z4 (Canada).
P. D. Lawrencet
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, The University of British Columbia, 2324 Main Mall, Vancouver BC V6T 1Z4 (Canada).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A novel off-line technique for automatic calibration of kinematic parameters for hydraulic manipulators is presented. Hydraulically actuated manipulators have joints which are always powered and, unlike conventional robots, may not have conventional joint sensors to exploit in the calibration procedure. Instead, our approach employs an external three-dimensional linkage, termed “the calibrator”, which has sufficient number of joints with corresponding sensors. One end of the calibrator is grasped by the manipulator's end effector while the other end is attached to a passive spherical joint fixed to the world coordinate system. The mobile closed kinematic chain thus formed has the added advantage of eliminating the explicit measurement of the manipulator's endpoint location. A sequential identification technique that uses a least squares numerical search algorithm has been developed based on link-by-link movement of the manipulator. Simulation and experimental calibration results on a typical mobile hydraulic manipulator are reported in this paper, which show that the proposed technique is globally stable, and potentially fast, inexpensive, and easy to apply on site.

Type
Article
Information
Robotica , Volume 14 , Issue 5 , September 1996 , pp. 541 - 551
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Mulligan, I.J., Mackworth, A.K. and Lawrence, P.D., “A Model-Based Vision System for Manipulator Position Sensing” Proceedings, Workshop on Interpretation of 3-D Scenes,Austin, TX(1989) pp. 168–193.Google Scholar
2. Fukuda, T., Fujisawa, Y., Kosuge, K., Arai, F., Muro, E., Hoshino, H., Miyazaki, T., Otube, K. and Uehara, K., “Manipulator/Vehicle System for Man-Robot Cooperation” Proceedings, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation,Nice, France,(1992) pp. 74–79.Google Scholar
3. Herman, T., Bonicelli, B., Sevilla, F., Monsion, M. and Bergeon, B., “Predictive Control of High Power Hydraulic Systems for Application to a Forestry Arm” Proceedings, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation,Nice, France,(1992) pp. 1941–1947.Google Scholar
4. Roth, Z.S., Mooring, B.W. and Ravani, B., “An Overview of Robot Calibration” IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation RA-3, 377–386 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Khatib, O., Craig, J.J. and Lozano-Perez, T. “A Review of Kinematic Calibration” The Robotics Review (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) (1989) pp. 207–242.Google Scholar
6. Mooring, B.W., Roth, Z.S. and Driels, M.R., Fundamentals of Manipulator Calibration (Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY, 1991).Google Scholar
7. Khoshzaban, M., “Kinematic and Dynamic Calibration of Hydraulically Actuated Manipulators” M.Sc. Thesis (University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC 1992).Google Scholar
8. Hayati, S.A. and Roston, G.P., “Inverse Kinematic Solution for Near-Simple Robots and Its Application to Robot Calibration” Recent Trends in Robotics: Modeling, Control, and Education (Elsevier Science Publication Company 1986).Google Scholar
9. Puskorius, G.V. and Feldkamp, L.A., “Global Calibration of a Robot/Vision System” Proceedings, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation,Raleigh, NC(1987) pp. 190–195.Google Scholar
10. Stone, H.W. and Sanderson, A.C., “A Prototype Arm Signature Identification System” Proceedings, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation,Raleigh, NC(1987) pp. 175–182.Google Scholar
11. Kau, K., Hocken, R. and Haynes, L., “Robot Performance Measurements Using Automatic Laser Tracking Techniques” Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing 2, 227–236 (1985).Google Scholar
12. Hollerbach, J.M. and Bennet, D.J. “Automatic Kinematic Calibration Using a Motion Tracking System” Robotics Research: 4th International Symposium, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1988) pp. 191–198.Google Scholar
13. An, C.H., Atkeson, C.G. and Hollerbach, J.M., Model-Based Control of a Robot Manipulator (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1988).Google Scholar
14. Bennet, D.J. and Hollerbach, J.M., “Identifying the Kinematics of Robots and Their Taska” Proceedings, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation,Tokyo, Japan(1989) pp. 580–586.Google Scholar
15. Bennet, D.J. and Hollerbach, J.M., “Autonomous Calibration of Single-Loop Closed Kinematic Chains Formed by Manipulators with Passive Endpoint Constraints” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 7, 597–606 (1991).Google Scholar
16. Bennet, D.J. and Hollerbach, J.M., “Closed-Loop Kinematic Calibration of the Utah-MIT hand” Experimental Robotics 1-The First International Symposium (Hayward, V. and Khatib, O., eds.) (Springer-Verlag, NY, 1990) pp. 539–552.Google Scholar
17. Whitney, D.E., Lozinski, C.A. and Roiirke, J.M., “Industrial Robot Forward Calibration Method and Results” ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 108, 1–8 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Renders, J.M., Rossignol, E., Becquet, M. and Hanus, R., “Kinematic Calibration and Geometrical Parameter Identification for Robots” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 7, 721–731 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Hayati, S.A., “Robot Arm Geometric Link Parameter Estimation” Proceedings, 22nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control,San Antonio, Texas(1983) pp. 1477–1483.Google Scholar
20. Veitschegger, W.K. and Wu, C.H., “Robot Accuracy Analysis Based on Kinematics” IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation RA-2,171–180 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Chen, J. and Chao, L.M., “Position in Error Analysis for Robot Manipulators with All-Rotary Joints” Proceedings, IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation,San Francisco(1986) pp. 1011–1016.Google Scholar
22. Judd, R.P. and Knasinski, A.B., “A Technique to Calibrate Industrial Robots with Experimental Verification” Proceedings, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation,Raleigh, NC(1987) pp. 251–357.Google Scholar
23. Becquet, M., “Analysis of Flexibility Sources in Robot Structures”, Proceddings IMAC/IFAC International Symposium on Modeling and Simulation of Distributed Parameter Systems,Hiroshima, Japan(1987) pp. 419–424.Google Scholar
24. Lee, H. and Liang, C., “Displacement Analysis of the General Spatial 7-Link 7R Mechanisms” Mechanisms and Machine Theory 23, 219–226 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Veitschegger, W.K. and Wu, C.H., “A Method for Calibrating and Compensating Robot Kinematic Error” Proceedings, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation,Raleigh, NC(1987) pp. 39–44.Google Scholar
26. Dennis, J.E. Jr. and Schnabel, R.B., Numerical Methods for Unconstrained Optimization and Nonlinear Equations (Prentice-Hall Series in Computational Mathematics, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1983).Google Scholar