Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-65dc7cd545-rzhp5 Total loading time: 0.253 Render date: 2021-07-25T04:21:14.069Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Article contents

Robust adaptive command filtered control of a robotic manipulator with uncertain dynamic and joint space constraints

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2018

Joseph Jean-Baptiste Mvogo Ahanda
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Yaounde I, Yaounde, Cameroon. E-mail: bessimb@yahoo.fr
Jean Bosco Mbede
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Telecommunications Engineering, Ecole Nationale Superieure Polytechnique, University of Yaounde I, Yaounde, Cameroon. E-mails: mbede@neuf.fr, achille.melingui@yahoo.fr
Achille Melingui
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Telecommunications Engineering, Ecole Nationale Superieure Polytechnique, University of Yaounde I, Yaounde, Cameroon. E-mails: mbede@neuf.fr, achille.melingui@yahoo.fr
Bernard Essimbi Zobo
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Yaounde I, Yaounde, Cameroon. E-mail: bessimb@yahoo.fr

Summary

The problem of robust adaptive control of a robotic manipulator subjected to uncertain dynamics and joint space constraints is addressed in this paper. Command filters are used to overcome the time derivatives of virtual control, thus reducing the need for desired trajectory differentiations. A barrier Lyapunov function is used to deal with the joint space constraints. A robust adaptive support vector regression architecture is used to reduce filtering errors, approximation errors and handle dynamic uncertainties. The stability analysis of the closed-loop system using the Lyapunov theory permits to highlight adaptation laws and to prove that all signals of the closed-loop system are bounded. Simulations show the effectiveness of the proposed control strategy.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

1. Li, Y., Qiang, S., Zhuang, X. and Kaynak, O., “Robust and adaptive backstepping control for nonlinear systems using RBF neural networks,” IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 15 (3), 694701 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Kwan, C. and Lewis, F. L., “Robust backstepping control of nonlinear systems using neural networks,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.-Part A: Syst. Hum. 30 (6), 753766 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Zhou, J., Wen, C. and Zhang, Y., “Adaptive backstepping control of a class of uncertain nonlinear systems with unknown backlash-like hysteresis,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 49 (10), 17511759 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Tong, S., Li, Y., Li, Y. and Liu, Y., “Observer-based adaptive fuzzy backstepping control for a class of stochastic nonlinear strict-feedback systems,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., Part B (Cybern.) 41 (6), 16931704 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Mbede, J. B. and Ahanda, J. J.-B. M., “Exponential tracking control using backstepping approach for voltage-based control of a flexible joint electrically driven robot,” J. Robot. 2014 (2014) 10 pages.Google Scholar
6. Su, C. Y. and Stepanenko, Y., “Backstepping-based hybrid adaptive control of robot manipulators incorporating actuator dynamics,” Int. J. Adapt. Control Signal Process. 11 (2), 141153 (1997).3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Oh, J. H. and Lee, J. S., “Control of Flexible Joint Robot System by Backstepping Design Approach,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (1997) pp. 3435–3440.Google Scholar
8. Huang, A.-C. and Chen, Y.-C., “Adaptive sliding control for single-link flexible-joint robot with mismatched uncertainties,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 12 (5), 770775 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Hwang, J. P. and Kim, E., “Robust tracking control of an electrically driven robot: Adaptive fuzzy logic approach,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 14 (2), 232247 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Cheong, J. Y., Han, S. I. and Lee, J. M., “Adaptive fuzzy dynamic surface sliding mode position control for a robot manipulator with friction and deadzone,” Math. Probl. Eng. 2013, (2013) 15 pages.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Chen, J., Li, Z., Zhang, G. and Gan, M., “Adaptive robust dynamic surface control with composite adaptation laws,” Int. J. Adapt. Control Signal Process. 24 (12), 10361050 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Ren, Y., Zhou, Y., Liu, Y., Gu, Y., Jin, M. and Liu, H., “Robust adaptive multi-task tracking control of redundant manipulators with dynamic and kinematic uncertainties and unknown disturbances,” Adv. Robot. 31 (9), 482495 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Izadbakhsh, A. and Khorashadizadeh, S., “Robust task-space control of robot manipulators using differential equations for uncertainty estimation,” Robotica 35 (9), 19231938 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Wolff, J., Weber, C. and Buss, M., “Continuous Control Mode Transitions for Invariance Control of Constrained Nonlinear Systems,” Proceedings of the 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (2007) pp. 542–547.Google Scholar
15. Bürger, M. and Guay, M., “Robust constraint satisfaction for continuous-time nonlinear systems in strict feedback form,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 15 (11), 25972601 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Grüne, L. and Pannek, J., Nonlinear Model Predictive Control (Springer London, 2011) pp. 4366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Magni, L., Raimondo, D. M. and Allgöwer, F., Nonlinear Model Predictive Control (Springer, New York, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Ding, L., Xia, K., Gao, H., Liu, G. and Deng, Z., “Robust adaptive control for door opening by a mobile rescue manipulator based on unknown-force-related constraints estimation,” Robotica 1–22 (2017).Google Scholar
19. Bemporad, A., “Reference governor for constrained nonlinear systems,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 43 (3), 415419 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Gilbert, E. and Kolmanovsky, I., “Nonlinear tracking control in the presence of state and control constraints: A generalized reference governor,” Automatica 38 (12), 20632073 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Dehaan, D. and Guay, M., “Extremum-seeking control of state-constrained nonlinear systems,” Automatica 41 (9), 15671574 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Krstic, M. and Bement, M., “Nonovershooting control of strict-feedback nonlinear systems,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 51 (12), 19381943 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Su, C.-Y., Stepanenko, Y. and Leung, T.-P., “Combined adaptive and variable structure control for constrained robots,” Automatica 31 (3), 483488 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Do, K. D., “Control of nonlinear systems with output tracking error constraints and its application to magnetic bearings,” Int. J. Control 83 (6), 11991216 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Tee, K. P. and Ge, S. S., “Control of State-Constrained Nonlinear Systems Using Integral Barrier Lyapunov Functionals,” Proceedings of the IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (2012) pp. 3239–3244.Google Scholar
26. Tee, K. P. and Ge, S. S., “Control of nonlinear systems with partial state constraints using a barrier Lyapunov function,” Int. J. Control 84 (12), 20082023 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Tee, K. P. and Ge, S. S., “Control of Nonlinear Systems with Full State Constraint Using A Barrier Lyapunov Function,” Proceedings of the 48th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2009 Held Jointly with the 2009 28th Chinese Control Conference CDC/CCC2009 (2009) pp. 8618–8623.Google Scholar
28. Niu, B. and Zhao, J., “Barrier Lyapunov functions for the output tracking control of constrained nonlinear switched systems,” Syst. Control Lett. 62 (10), 963971 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Liu, Y.-J., Li, D. J. and Tong, S., “Adaptive output feedback control for a class of nonlinear systems with full-state constraints,” Int. J. Control 87 (2), 281290 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Tang, Z.-L., Ge, S. S., Tee, K. P. and He, W., “Adaptive neural control for an uncertain robotic manipulator with joint space constraints,” Int. J. Control 89 (7), 14281446 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. Ngo, K. B., Mahony, R. and Jiang, Z.-P., “Integrator Backstepping Using Barrier Functions For Systems with Multiple State Constraints,” Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (2005) pp. 8306–8312.Google Scholar
32. He, W., David, A. O., Yin, Z. and Sun, C., “Neural network control of a robotic manipulator with input deadzone and output constraint,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern.: Syst. 46 (6), 759770 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. He, W. and Ge, S. S., “Vibration control of a flexible beam with output constraint,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 62 (8), 50235030 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Meng, W., Yang, Q., Pan, D., Zheng, H., Wang, G. and Sun, Y., “NN-Based Asymptotic Tracking Control for a Class of Strict-Feedback Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Output Constraints,” Proceedings of the IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control CDC (2012) pp. 5410–5415.Google Scholar
35. Zhao, Z., He, W. and Ge, S. S., “Adaptive neural network control of a fully actuated marine surface vessel with multiple output constraints,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 22 (4), 15361543 (2014).Google Scholar
36. Farrell, J. A., Polycarpou, M., Sharma, M. and Dong, W., “Command filtered backstepping,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 54 (6), 13911395 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37. Dong, W., Farrell, J. A., Polycarpou, M. M., Djapic, V. and Sharma, M., “Command filtered adaptive backstepping,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 20 (3), 566580 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38. Zhang, X. and Mu, L., “Command filtered adaptive fuzzy neural network backstepping control for marine power system,” Math. Prob. Eng. 2014, (2014) 6 pages.Google Scholar
39. Ren, J. and Liu, L., “Adaptive neural network control for ship steering system using filtered backstepping design,” J. Appl. Sci. 13 (10), 1691 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40. Djapic, V., Farrell, J. and Dong, W., “Land Vehicle Control Using a Command Filtered Backstepping Approach,” Proceedings of the American Control Conference (2008) pp. 2461–2466.Google Scholar
41. Smola, A. J. and Schölkopf, B., “A tutorial on support vector regression,” Statist. Comput. 14 (3), 199222 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Robust adaptive command filtered control of a robotic manipulator with uncertain dynamic and joint space constraints
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Robust adaptive command filtered control of a robotic manipulator with uncertain dynamic and joint space constraints
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Robust adaptive command filtered control of a robotic manipulator with uncertain dynamic and joint space constraints
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *