Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-7f7b94f6bd-98q29 Total loading time: 0.912 Render date: 2022-06-29T16:44:15.360Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

SET THEORY AND A MODEL OF THE MIND IN PSYCHOLOGY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

ASGER TÖRNQUIST
Affiliation:
DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN, UNIVERSITETSPARKEN 5 COPENHAGEN, 2100DENMARKE-mail: asgert@math.ku.dk
JENS MAMMEN
Affiliation:
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATION AND PSYCHOLOGY AALBORG UNIVERSITY, RENDSBURGGADE 14 AALBORG, 9000DENMARKE-mail: mammen@hum.aau.dkE-mail: jensmammen@gmail.com

Abstract

We investigate the mathematics of a model of the human mind which has been proposed by the psychologist Jens Mammen. Mathematical realizations of this model consists of what the first author (A.T.) has called Mammen spaces, where a Mammen space is a triple $(U,\mathcal S,\mathcal C)$ , where U is a non-empty set (“the universe”), $\mathcal S$ is a perfect Hausdorff topology on U, and $\mathcal C\subseteq \mathcal P(U)$ together with $\mathcal S$ satisfy certain axioms.

We refute a conjecture put forward by Hoffmann-Jørgensen, who conjectured that the existence of a “complete” Mammen space implies the Axiom of Choice, by showing that in the first Cohen model, in which ZF holds but AC fails, there is a complete Mammen space. We obtain this by proving that in the first Cohen model, every perfect topology can be extended to a maximal perfect topology.

On the other hand, we also show that if all sets are Lebesgue measurable, or all sets are Baire measurable, then there are no complete Mammen spaces with a countable universe.

Further, we investigate two new cardinal invariants $\mathfrak u_{M}$ and $\mathfrak u_{T}$ associated with complete Mammen spaces and maximal perfect topologies, and establish some basic inequalities that are provable in ZFC. Then we show $\mathfrak u_{M}=\mathfrak u_{T}=2^{\aleph _{0}}$ follows from Martin’s Axiom, and, contrastingly, we show that $\aleph _{1}=\mathfrak u_{M}=\mathfrak u_{T}<2^{\aleph _{0}}=\aleph _{2}$ in the Baumgartner–Laver model.

Finally, consequences for psychology are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Association for Symbolic Logic

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baumgartner, J. E., & Laver, R. (1979). Iterated perfect-set forcing. Annals of Mathematical Logic, 17(3), 271288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brendle, J., & Löwe, B. (1999). Solovay-type characterizations for forcing-algebras. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 64(3), 13071323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dzhafarov, E. N. (2017). On Random Variability of Responses: A Note on Jens Mammen’s Book. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Engelsted, N. (2017). Catching Up With Aristotle. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51088-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, R. H. (1945). On topologies for function spaces. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 51, 429432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Halpern, J. D., & Lévy, A. (1971). The Boolean prime ideal theorem does not imply the axiom of choice. In Axiomatic Set Theory: Part I (University of California, Los Angeles, California, 1967). Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, Vol. 13. Providence: American Mathematical Society, pp. 83134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, E. (1943). A problem of set-theoretic topology. Duke Mathematical Journal, 10, 309333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann-Jørgensen, J. (2000). Maximal perfect topologies. In Mammen, J. Engelsted, N., Bertelsen, P., Hansen, T., Karpatschof, B., Schultz, E., Kvorning, J., and Flor, J.R., editors. Psykens Topologi. Det Matematiske Grundlag for Teorien om sanse- og Udvalgskategorier. Breve til Selskabet for Teoretisk Psykologi. Psykologisk skriftserie., Vol. 25. Aarhus: Aarhus University, pp. 353362. Available from: http://vbn.aau.dk/files/252809502/MaximalPerfectTopologies.pdf.Google Scholar
Jech, T. (2003). Set Theory: The Third Millennium Edition, Revised and Expanded. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Jech, T. J. (1973). The Axiom of Choice. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, Vol. 75. Amsterdam–London: North-Holland; New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Kechris, A. S. (1995). Classical Descriptive Set Theory. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Vol. 156. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krøjgaard, P. (2009). The human ability to single out and track specific objects through space and time: Origin and application. In Tønnesvang, J., Høgh-Olesen, H., and Bertelsen, P., editors. Human Characteristics. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars, pp. 89116.Google Scholar
Krøjgaard, P. (2016). Keeping track of individuals: Insights from developmental psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(2), 264276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kunen, K. (1980). Set Theory: An Introduction to Independence Proofs. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, Vol. 102. Amsterdam–New York: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Leontiev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the Development of the Mind. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
Mammen, J. (1993). The elements of psychology. In Karpatschof, B., Engelsted, N., Hedegaard, M., and Mortensen, A., editors. The Societal Subject. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, pp. 2944.Google Scholar
Mammen, J. (1996). Den menneskelige sans. Et essay om psykologiens genstandsområde. Copenhagen: Dansk Psykologisk Forlag, 1983, 1989. Available from: http://engelsted.net/almenbiblio/bibliomammen/DMSheletext.pdf.Google Scholar
Mammen, J. (2017). A New Logical Foundation for Psychology. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mammen, J. (2019). A grammar of praxis: An exposé of “A new logical foundation for psychology,” a few additions, and replies to Alaric Kohler and Alexander Poddiakov. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 53(2), 223237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mammen, J. (2021). Bridging: Some personal reflections. A tribute to Jaan Valsiner. In Christensen, B. A., Wagoner, B., and Demuth, C., editors. Culture as Process. Cham: Springer, pp. 389398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mammen, J., & Mironenko, I. (2015). Activity theories and the ontology of psychology: Learning from Danish and Russian experience. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49, 681713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mogensen, J. (1990). Sanse- og udvalgskategorielle strukturer i den skizofrene erkendelse—og i psykiatriens [Sense and choice categorial structures in schizophrenic cognition—and in psychiatry’s], Vols. 1 and 2. Aarhus: Institute of Psychology, Aarhus University.Google Scholar
Neumann, A. (2015). Looking for a symphony. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50, 257263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Repický, M. (2015). A proof of the independence of the axiom of choice from the Boolean prime ideal theorem. Commentationes Mathematicae Universitatis Carolinae, 56(4), 543546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelah, S. (1984). Can you take Solovay’s inaccessible away? Israel Journal of Mathematics, 48(1), 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solovay, R. M. (1970). A model of set-theory in which every set of reals is Lebesgue measurable. Annals of Mathematics. Second Series, 92, 156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1964). Individuals. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
van Douwen, E. K. (1993). Applications of maximal topologies. Topology and its Applications, 51(2), 125139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, F., & Carey, S. (1996). Infants’ metaphysics: The case of numerical identity. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 111153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

SET THEORY AND A MODEL OF THE MIND IN PSYCHOLOGY
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

SET THEORY AND A MODEL OF THE MIND IN PSYCHOLOGY
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

SET THEORY AND A MODEL OF THE MIND IN PSYCHOLOGY
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *